Thread: I thought of killing myself, says climate scandal professor Phil Jones

I know the fact of this whole "climategate" already having been debunked is already inconvenient to you and your campaign to continue to spread disinformation but really,hanging your hat on comments from the timesonline now!?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

I know the fact of this whole "climategate" already having been debunked is already inconvenient to you and your campaign to continue to spread disinformation but really,hanging your hat on comments from the timesonline now!?

So what bible do you hail from which speaks the truth?

Fortunately, you and your thinking are becoming the minority.

You're actually quite amazing, and no doubt you're like a few that defend global warming, but do feck all to save the earth! I'm sure deep down, you know like so many others that no matter what you do or don't do, you're effort or non, will have little or no effect at all.

Did the fluffy bears and rabbits get to you?

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

So what bible do you hail from which speaks the truth?

No bible, simply objective fact -- namely that this "climategate" that you seem so desperate to cling to has been wholly and roundly debunked. You're flogging a dead and decayed horse.

Fortunately, you and your thinking are becoming the minority.

Yes I fear you're correct. Increasingly it seems that people are ignorant of or blind too objective fact and reality.

But what are you basing that on though? The comments section from the timesonline?

You're actually quite amazing, and no doubt you're like a few that defend global warming, but do feck all to save the earth! I'm sure deep down, you know like so many others that no matter what you do or don't do, you're effort or non, will have little or no effect at all.

Did the fluffy bears and rabbits get to you?

Really, no doubt huh? Well I hate to tear down that strawman that you've just constructed but you haven't got the first clue. You'll have to find another windmill to tilt at on your Quixotic crusade I'm afraid.

Try telling the poor sods in Europe including the UK that there is global warming. Its been more like Global Freezing since well before Xmas.

A lot of hype methinks to grab more taxes and hike up prices.

Yet again, understand the difference between localised weather and global climate.

Oh and btw, there's an El Nino event that's been happening in the Pacific for a few months now, which explains this winters unusual weather. It's likely to produce record high temperatures here. Such anecdotal evidence really means nothing.

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

“… it would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government …” - David Rockefeller in Baden-Baden, Germany 1991, thanking major media for keeping secret for decades the movement of the prophetic one world government. DAVID ROCKEFELLER

This is the thing I have been waiting for for years.
Never seem to hear much about it anymore.
But Rockefellers have been at it's center for years now, and it will happen sooner than I ever thought possible.
If you wonder why Osama Obama is such a different acting dude and has seemed to do nothing, wait and see what will happen next.
I do hope that you are ready for the tri-Laterals to take over, as ONE WORLD- ONE GOVT. is about to happen.

It's amazing in a way how people like to slag off sources that produce data that do not support their pet theory or belief. Maybe Red (Ant) Robbo would prefer data picked from that erudite source of all that is good and truthful, The Sun newpaper (I use the term newspaper in it's loosest form).

The fact is the 2007(?) report from the IPCC has been shown to be so full of dodgy data and questionable references that only a complete idiot would rely on it especially when when embarking on spending trillions of dollars. But the warmists have been totally blinded by their faith in this utterly discrdited document that they will not enter into any meaningful discussion.

If the case for AGW is so solid then why won't they enter into discussions with the sceptics and prove their point? Why are they continually hiding the raw data from which they make their case?

Anyway I don't believe this claim of considered suicide, he's just a bluddy drama queen trying to gather the sympathy vote. Well he'll find sympathy in the dictionary just before syphillus.

Originally Posted by bretby

Try telling the poor sods in Europe including the UK that there is global warming. Its been more like Global Freezing since well before Xmas.

Actually the current freezing of the UK could come from Global warming and El nino....

Global warming may actually cause colder temps' during winter times as well as record temps' in summer and so on...



See....

Originally Posted by Belepheron

It's amazing in a way how people like to slag off sources that produce data that do not support their pet theory or belief. Maybe Red (Ant) Robbo would prefer data picked from that erudite source of all that is good and truthful, The Sun newpaper (I use the term newspaper in it's loosest form).

It's nothing to do with the source and everything to do with the fact that the so-called "climategate" is nothing of the sort. There is no conspiracy or Machiavellian plot, the leaked e-mails simply don't show what some purport they do (increasingly what some apparently hope they do, actually). Whatever names yourself and JJ want to call me doesn't change that one jot.

And there's no small amount of irony in you using the phrase "slag off sources that produce data that do not support their pet theory or belief" either considering the continued wilfull blindness to this point.

That JJ repeatedly ignores this fact and is now hanging his hat on the peg of the comments section of a timesonline article is laughable, but again nothing to do with the source.

The fact is the 2007(?) report from the IPCC has been shown to be so full of dodgy data and questionable references...

Such as... ?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Belepheron

The fact is the 2007(?) report from the IPCC has been shown to be so full of dodgy data and questionable references...

Such as... ?

Recent studies seem to indicate that the report seriously underestimated the speed of global warming.

Originally Posted by Belepheron

It's amazing in a way how people like to slag off sources that produce data that do not support their pet theory or belief.

So how long did you it take you to read all the climategate emails?

For the nay-sayers/doubters/ignorant, lets start with 3 words.

Finite closed system.

Add 6 billion people and all their associated activity.

Guess what, change occurs.

Originally Posted by StrontiumDog

Oh and btw, there's an El Nino event that's been happening in the Pacific for a few months now, which explains this winters unusual weather. It's likely to produce record high temperatures here. Such anecdotal evidence really means nothing.

I really love this - "anything that might contradict my beliefs 'means nothing' "

That's why it's not 'global warming' anymore, but 'climate change'. Lovely.

Originally Posted by StrontiumDog

For the nay-sayers/doubters/ignorant, lets start with 3 words.

Finite closed system.

Add 6 billion people and all their associated activity.

Guess what, change occurs.

Right-on S.D.

Some say that our "Space Ship Earth" could support three billion of our species.

I sometimes wonder what ever happened to the ZPG (Zero Population Growth) movement some decades ago....what could displace such a sensible notion?

Incidentally, I've read that some behavioural anthropologists believe that 330 is the ideal number of inhabitants for a 'village'.

So much to do...so little time.

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

Professor Phil Jones said in an exclusive interview with The Sunday Times that he had thought about killing himself “several times”.

These climate nuts think too much and never put their thoughts into action

Originally Posted by blackgang

I do hope that you are ready for the tri-Laterals to take over, as ONE WORLD- ONE GOVT. is about to happen.

I don't believe our species is socially evolved to the point of a workable one world government yet, we're too hung up with tribalistic thinking. So rest easy, old dude, ain't gonna happen for awhile--if ever.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Belepheron

It's amazing in a way how people like to slag off sources that produce data that do not support their pet theory or belief. Maybe Red (Ant) Robbo would prefer data picked from that erudite source of all that is good and truthful, The Sun newpaper (I use the term newspaper in it's loosest form).

It's nothing to do with the source and everything to do with the fact that the so-called "climategate" is nothing of the sort. There is no conspiracy or Machiavellian plot, the leaked e-mails simply don't show what some purport they do (increasingly what some apparently hope they do, actually). Whatever names yourself and JJ want to call me doesn't change that one jot.

And there's no small amount of irony in you using the phrase "slag off sources that produce data that do not support their pet theory or belief" either considering the continued wilfull blindness to this point.

That JJ repeatedly ignores this fact and is now hanging his hat on the peg of the comments section of a timesonline article is laughable, but again nothing to do with the source.

The fact is the 2007(?) report from the IPCC has been shown to be so full of dodgy data and questionable references...

Such as... ?

I don't recall calling you names. I leave that to the likes of you!

Originally Posted by Agent_Smith

Originally Posted by blackgang

I do hope that you are ready for the tri-Laterals to take over, as ONE WORLD- ONE GOVT. is about to happen.

I don't believe our species is socially evolved to the point of a workable one world government yet, we're too hung up with tribalistic thinking. So rest easy, old dude, ain't gonna happen for awhile--if ever.

Welcome to global carbon tax!

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

I don't recall calling you names. I leave that to the likes of you!

You engaged in ad hominen JJ. And you've just done it again in your typically disingenuous way.

Really your arguments are fundamentally flawed if you can't debate them on the merits and instead have to resort to such.

It's possibly your arrogance and elitist attitude along with your annoyance that people, and a fair few of them at that, are not prepared to think along the same lines as you.

I don't recall getting into name calling unless i have reacted to one direct at myself. However, you can not deny, reading from your other post and other threads, that you do tend to get involved in the "my daddy is tougher than yours" mentality.

Good-day sir!

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

Welcome to global carbon tax!

Meaning what?

It is almost amusing (in a sad way) how many in society fight against progressive clean energy ideas. We have the technology now to rid our planet of carbon emitting power sources but simply lack the will or, in JJ's case, lack the belief that dirtying our planet has absolutely no long term consequences. Even if you don't believe in man-made climate change I would hope that enough rational folks would make the choice to live on a clean planet. But, as is par for the course with our species, money trumps wisdom.

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

It's possibly your arrogance and elitist attitude along with your annoyance that people, and a fair few of them at that, are not prepared to think along the same lines as you.

I could care less about people thinking along the same lines as me, much less what others think of me. For one it's not a popularity contest, for another your subjctive view and opinion of me is completely and utterly irrelevant. What's telling is your constant recourse to that however.

So frankly you should be more concerned with your inability to logically, coherently and rationally debate an issue.

I don't recall getting into name calling unless i have reacted to one direct at myself. However, you can not deny, reading from your other post and other threads, that you do tend to get involved in the "my daddy is tougher than yours" mentality.

Good-day sir!

If you can't recall you've an epically poor memory then, you've just called me names in the preceeding paragraph.