Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat
    crippen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 11:59 AM
    Location
    Korat
    Posts
    5,210

    Now Big Brother targets helpful parents .

    Now Big Brother targets helpful parents as one in four Britons are to be vetted for giant child protection database
    By JAMES SLACK, HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR
    Last updated at 2:11 AM on 11th September 2009
    Comments (0)
    Add to My Stories
    Parents could face a 5,000 fine for driving their children's friends to a sports event or Cub Scout meeting.
    They face punishment and a criminal record if they have not been vetted first by a massive new government agency.
    An astonishing 11.3million people - one adult in four - are likely to come under the watchful eye of the Independent Safeguarding Authority.

    Target: Parents face a 5,000 fine for driving their children's friends to sport events and Cub Scout meetings when the Independent Safeguarding Authority is launched next month (picture posed by models)
    Launched next month, it will be the biggest vetting and clearing system in the world.
    Every person who comes into regular contact with children or the elderly, through work or volunteering, must be approved by ISA officials checking for criminal convictions, disciplinary action and even unproven allegations.
    It goes way beyond the current Criminal Records Bureau system, which covers only 6million people.
    For the first time, 300,000 school governors, dinner ladies and parents who visit schools or nurseries to read to children will be involved.
    It will even apply to parents who, at the request of organisations like junior football teams or the Guides, give their children's friends lifts to or from events.
    If they do so without first being vetted by the ISA's 200 staff, they could be fined up to 5,000 and given a criminal record.
    The clubs themselves will face a 5,000 fine - potentially enough to ruin them. Parents who host foreign pupils on school exchange trips will also have to be vetted.
    MPs and academics fear the change will have disastrous consequences.
    Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said: 'We are going to drive away volunteers, we'll see clubs and activities close down and we'll end up with more bored young people on our streets.'
    Liberal Democrat spokesman Chris Huhne said: 'We are in danger of creating a world in which we think every adult who approaches children means to do them harm.
    'The creation of the world's biggest checking system is a disproportionate response to the problem it is trying to solve.'
    The Office of the Information Commissioner said there were 'inevitable' security risks in collecting large amounts of personal data.
    Philip Pullman, best-selling author of His Dark Materials, has already pledged to stop giving readings in schools in protest at the scheme.

    Outraged: Children's author Philip Pullman has pledged to stop giving readings in schools in protest at the scheme
    He has called it 'corrosive to healthy social interaction' because it will encourage children to see everyone as a potential rapist or killer.
    The scheme was recommended by the Bichard report into the Soham murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman by school caretaker Ian Huntley.
    Huntley was given the job because allegations of sex with underage girls were not passed on.
    The Home Office said: 'The Vetting and Barring Scheme does not cover personal or family relationships, so parents making informal arrangements to give lifts to children will not have to be vetted.
    'However, anyone working or volunteering on behalf of a third party organisation - for example, a sports club or a charity - who has frequent or intensive access to children or vulnerable adults will have to be registered.
    'We believe this is a commonsense approach and what parents would rightly expect.'
    Registering with the ISA will cost 64 in England and Wales, although unpaid volunteers will be exempt.
    Registration will be needed for activities which involve contact with children or vulnerable adults three times in a month, every month, or once overnight, as well as jobs in places such as schools, prisons and children's homes.
    In a 'belt and braces' approach, everyone currently working with children and old people will have to be vetted, even if they have already been cleared by the Criminal Records Bureau.
    Those whose jobs involve mandatory enhanced CRB checks will continue to undergo them.
    An enhanced CRB check costs 36, which means that, on top of the 64 ISA fee, being cleared to work with children could cost 100.

    Read more: Now Big Brother targets helpful parents as 1 in 4 Britons are to be vetted for giant new child protection database | Mail Online

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    60,017
    holy crap.

    overboard.

    is this a reliable source ? or speculation ?

  3. #3
    Dan
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by kingwilly
    is this a reliable source ?
    It's from the Mail - the newspaper of choice for bored secretaries and paranoid, middle-aged, white men, furious that the world has passed them by.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    Marmite the Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Last Online
    08-09-2014 @ 10:43 AM
    Location
    Simian Islands
    Posts
    34,827
    Quote Originally Posted by kingwilly
    is this a reliable source ?
    The Daily Mail? Sensationalist crap in the main.

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat
    crippen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 11:59 AM
    Location
    Korat
    Posts
    5,210

    For KW.

    ISRM : Vetting and Barring Scheme Registration delayed Summer 2010 . Para 5: Bars will apply in a much wider range of workplaces and volunteer settings.

  6. #6
    Dan
    Guest
    The Mail are first in line to scream "Why the fuck isn't something being done?" when some old perv feels up a kid at the local Scouts' meeting but then the government does something and the Mail scream "Why the fuck is the government doing this?" I realise that expecting intellectual consistency from an poisonous old rag, devoted solely to exploiting the delusional fears of stupid old cunts, is absurd but why take this stuff at face value: count how many times the Mail is forced to use hypothetical constructs in that article.

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    60,017
    Quote Originally Posted by Marmite the Dog
    The Daily Mail? Sensationalist crap in the main.
    That's what I thought, just checking.

    Thanks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •