Thread: U.S. launches missile strikes in Syria

Originally Posted by jabir

My guess is sphincters are tightening in UK and US.

Your guess is laughable.

Oh do fuck off buttfuck you're getting as tiresome as Jeff.

the UN security council to discuss the air attacks on syria (10 pm thailand time):

UN Live United Nations Web TV

the un secretary general is speaking now: UN Live United Nations Web TV

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

I presume you're talking about a country that uses poison gas on its own people......

You're blissfully right, as usual, Mr. Knowlton.

Freak show........

Obviously, my plain English point, is totally beyond both your listening-skills, and your reading comprehension levels. I was actually being sarcastic. Butt, even the average dunce likes of a bsnub, is astute enough to grasp that much!

As such, your pathetic little wb racial slur, confirms the fact, that beneath it all, both Farangrakthai_&_bsnub are truly brothers of the same kilt; just different colors of the same,....plaid woven ilk. Congratulations, on your par-level achievement.

Fuck em hard and often.
That's my pennyworth.

ok: tuskegenben: i'll put you down in the same group as bsnub and harry that assad is responsible for the chemical attacks (which the us/uk mainstream media is saying).

Thank you, Alex Jones, for standing-up.

you're welcome

Originally Posted by Farangrakthai

sigh? you're like bsnub and harry and just want to believe what is told to you by the uk/us mainstream media?

Once again it is deductive reasoning. People such as yourselves are quick as lightning to always absolve Russia and its puppets of any wrong doing. It is predictable as the sunrise. Your theory that the rebels gassed themselves is absurd. But what else to expect from a Russian apologist.

The U.N. Security Council overwhelmingly rejected a Russian resolution calling for condemnation of "aggression" by the United States, United Kingdom and France against Syria on Saturday, a vote reflecting support for the allied airstrikes on Syrian chemical sites.But the vote at the end of an emergency meeting called by Russia also demonstrated again the paralysis of the U.N.'s most powerful body in dealing with Syria's seven-year conflict.

Russia's demand for condemnation and an immediate halt to "aggression" and "any further use of force" by the three Western allies got support from only two other countries on the 15-member Security Council — China and Bolivia.

By contrast, eight countries voted against the Russian draft — the U.S., U.K., France, Netherlands, Sweden, Kuwait, Poland and Ivory Coast. Four countries abstained — Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Equatorial Guinea and Peru.

At the meeting, the fifth in a week on chemical weapons in Syria, Russia and its supporters again clashed with the U.S. and its allies over a suspected poison gas attack on April 7 in the Damascus suburb of Douma.

The U.S., U.K. and France said they launched airstrikes against Syrian chemical sites after obtaining evidence that a chemical weapon was used by President Bashar Assad's government. Russia and its ally Syria called the attack fabricated and said no evidence of chemical weapons use exists in Douma.

U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley told the council "there is clear information demonstrating Assad's culpability."

And she said President Donald Trump told her Saturday morning that if the Syrian regime uses poisonous gas again "the United States is locked and loaded" to strike again.

"When our president draws a red line, our president enforces the red line," Haley stressed. "The United States of America will not allow the Assad regime to continue using chemical weapons."

France's U.N. Ambassador Francois Delattre said the result of the vote sends "a clear message" that Security Council members recognized the need for the airstrikes, and "their proportional and targeted nature."

"And what's most important is no one contests that the use of chemical weapons cannot be tolerated and must be deterred," he said. "That is essential."

Russia's U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said the meeting confirmed that the U.S. and its allies "continue to put international politics and diplomacy in the realm of myth-making — myths invented in London, Paris and Washington."

"We put facts contrary to your myths," he said. "If we continue on this path, we will soon reach the diplomacy of the absurd."

Russia and Syria also clashed with the three Western allies over the legality of the airstrikes and responsibility for the Security Council's paralysis.

Britain's U.N. Ambassador Karen Pierce blamed Russia for repeatedly vetoing resolutions on the use of chemical weapons in Syria and said the U.K. took military action "to save lives," on the legal basis of "humanitarian intervention."

Britain believes "that is wholly within the principles and practices of the United Nations," she said.

Russia's Nebenzia called it "a very sad day for the world, for the U.N., for its Charter which was blatantly, blatantly violated, and for the Security Council which has shirked its responsibilities."

"I would like to believe that we will not see a day that is worse than today," he said.

Looking ahead, Delattre said France, Britain and the United States will soon be presenting the Security Council with a new draft resolution aimed at achieving a lasting solution to the Syrian conflict that addresses political, chemical and humanitarian issues.

Nebenzia responded saying the environment is "not very conducive for any rapprochement" and "the political and dangerous military situation we are in now" must be sorted out first.

"Once again, we demand an immediate stop to aggression and refrain from the illegal use of force in the future," he said.

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who briefed the council before the vote, stressed again "the need to avoid the situation from spiraling out of control" and for a political solution.

Guterres said he has asked Syrian special envoy Staffan de Mistura to come to New York as soon as possible to consult "on the most effective way to accelerate the political process."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/un-reject...183048462.html

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

they are really drunk on power, and don't realize they have blood on their hands for starting it all

I bet the whole point in Syria, like it was in Vietnam when the US was losing big, is not to be humiliated by a Russian victory on thr ground

absolutely crazy, and we wonder how world wars start

The US was never loosing in Vietnam.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

The US was never loosing in Vietnam.

...a typo saved you from a gross inaccuracy...

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

nothing to do with hate, not sure why you need to be so simplistic about it, as usual

it's about rogue actions being taken by a country, actions that need to be denounced and chastised for being shameful, on the top of being illegal

let's hope TRUMP fix all this, in his usual way

Your ok with Syria using nerve gas on civilians?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Davis, you don't know at all about this, nobody does,

so repeating conveniently what your "masters" tell you just to reassure your "ordinary" ego doesn't make it the truth

what matters is respect for others sovereignty and not acting like a fucking teenager on drugs, which is what the US has been doing for the last 30 years

The British are certainly guilty as being drunk hooligans too, but they have been like that since the beginning of age, that's why they have become isolated and nothing at the end

this will be the same for the US, eventually, alone and with no real influence

China and Russia are the next games, it's already done, you guys haven't realized it yet, hence why you need to send missiles randomly on false pretense

Game over USA, join the UK club of world losers

If if nobody knows about this ,what qualifies you to speak.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

it's sad to see the US what it has become,

a system dominated by evil people that are just looking for wars and looting resources,

I suspect the negative influence of those Saxon barbarians

USA was built on French ideals, ideals betrayed by narrow Anglo-Saxon minds and pettiness

Maybe you could state state where the US is fighting wars with the intent of looting resources.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/...rael-1.5995946

How clear and right was Khaddafi at the UN General Assembly when he tore the whole UN Charter and spoke out his mind (the ones he addressed did not listened anyway, left the auditorium straight away)

Originally Posted by bsnub

Britain believes "that is wholly within the principles and practices of the United Nations," she said.

a joke?

War is God's way of teaching Americans geography - Ambrose Bierce (an American)

You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried eveything else - Winston Churchill (a half-American)

Originally Posted by bsnub

Logical deduction. Clearly a trait you are lacking.

irony meter to the roof