Thread: Former Russian spy critically ill in Britain after exposure to unidentified substance

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

I don't see anyone getting tough with the 'Blue Suede Shoes'.

As I pointed out in post #112 the 'Blue Suede Shoes' are experts at assassinations.

The 3 Main Suspects behind the Skripal Attempt – and Russia Is not among Them

According to former British diplomat and historian Craig Murray, for instance, it is more reasonable to cast the net of suspicion onto Israel for many of the same reasons cited by the British government:
“Israel has the nerve agents. Israel has Mossad which is extremely skilled at foreign assassinations. Theresa May claimed Russian propensity to assassinate abroad as a specific reason to believe Russia did it. Well Mossad has an even greater propensity to assassinate abroad. And while I am struggling to see a Russian motive for damaging its own international reputation so grieviously, Israel has a clear motivation for damaging the Russian reputation so grieviously. Russian action in Syria has undermined the Israeli position in Syria and Lebanon in a fundamental way, and Israel has every motive for damaging Russia’s international position by an attack aiming to leave the blame on Russia.”

https://new.euro-med.dk/20180318-the...among-them.php

Poor old Vlad is dying to know what the intelligence services know.

THE LORD, has his finger in many pies. Each pie, savoury or sweet can be tasted, put back to mature or gobbled up in an instant.

Now, also the other media have taken over from SputnikNews. (or vice versa?)
Anyway, still "highly likely"...


Britain dismisses news report on Skripal poisoners as 'wild speculation'

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain’s security minister on Thursday dismissed a report that police have identified several Russians who were behind the poisoning of former Russian double-agent Sergei Skripal as “wild speculation”.

“I think this story belongs in the ‘ill informed and wild speculation folder’” Ben Wallace said on Twitter, in response to the Press Association report.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-b...-idUSKBN1K91V0

Originally Posted by OhOh

THE LORD, has his finger in many pies.

Isn't that a bit unhygenic ? He might need to upgrade his waitering skills...

Originally Posted by SKkin

Isn't that anti-semantic ...or something like that.

I can think of some other news stories where the word Russians could be replaced with "blue suede shoes"

Ooooh you haven't been jewdy-ised....

How long is 98% of the world going to be held hostage by the brazen bullshit of the "chosen" 2%(or a portion thereof)?

So 2 people are walking down a street and they come across a spray bottle. First reaction by one is to spray her wrists to see if its a perfume. The second person then breaks the bottle in his hands but doesn't know how. Is someone tekkin the piss?

Mr Rowley said his brother's recollection of what happened was "very vague", but added: "He definitely said to me that they found this bottle of something and Dawn sprayed it on her wrists and that he picked it up and broke it somehow - and that's how he got it on his hands."

Sky news.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

So 2 people are walking down a street and they come across a spray bottle. First reaction by one is to spray her wrists to see if its a perfume. The second person then breaks the bottle in his hands but doesn't know how. Is someone tekkin the piss?

Sky news.

So he then took the broken bottle home for the investigators to find, they did say they found it in the house didnt they and was there ever anything said about it being broken?

Perhaps he collects broken bottles.

A Dior lady:

One woman can vouch for Novichok.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

So 2 people are walking down a street and they come across a spray bottle.

They are not so ordinary people. First, it was reported they are homeless, or did I got it wrong? Or just she was? Living in a hostel for homeless, mother of 11ye daughter?
Drug addicts? Picking things on a street. However, he's got a house. And not so of a poor value. Strange, isn't it?

Surely, now he will change his life... (Perhaps they will tear down the house)

^Ms. May, tear down the house...

‘O what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive!’

Sir Walter Scott.Marmion; A Tale of Flodden Field (published in 1808)

US to impose new sanctions on Russia over Skripal poisoning


"The US is imposing new sanctions on Russia over the poisoning of double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter in the UK. The measures are scheduled to go into effect on or around August 22, according to the State Department.
"The United States...determined under the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 (CBW Act) that the government of the Russian Federation has used chemical or biological weapons in violation of international law, or has used lethal chemical or biological weapons against its own nationals," State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said in a statement on Wednesday.


The accusation comes despite there being zero evidence suggesting Moscow was behind the attack.
A State Department official told reporters in a conference call on Wednesday that Washington informed Russia "this afternoon" about the sanctions. The US still wants to maintain relations with Moscow, despite the new sanctions. "We are tough on Russia, at the same time we are quite committed to working to maintain relations because there are important things at stake here," the official said, as quoted by Sputnik.

London was predictably delighted and rushed to welcome Washington’s announcement of new punitive actions against Moscow. “The UK welcomes this further action by our US allies,” a spokesman for the UK Foreign Office said in a statement. “The strong international response to the use of a chemical weapon on the streets of Salisbury sends an unequivocal message to Russia that its provocative, reckless behavior will not go unchallenged.”
The first tranche of US sanctions would reportedly ban licenses for the export of sensitive national security goods to Russia. In the past, such exports are said to have included items like electronic devices and components, as well as test and calibration equipment for avionics. These kinds of exports have previously been allowed on a case-by-case basis.
The reporters were told that the second round of sanctions will reportedly kick in three months later, unless Russia provides "reliable assurances" that it won't use chemical weapons in the future and agrees to "on-site inspections" by the UN.

It would reportedly include more drastic measures, such as downgrading diplomatic relations, banning the Russian airline Aeroflot from flying to the US and cutting off nearly all exports and imports.

Western countries have been quick to place blame on Moscow over the poisoning, disregarding the absence of proof that would implicate the Kremlin in the crime. Russia has denied having any part in the attack and has offered its full cooperation in the investigation."

https://www.rt.com/usa/435468-us-new...tions-skripal/

Originally Posted by OhOh

disregarding the absence of proof

Who says there is no proof?

Ah yes, the Russians.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Who says there is no proof?

Ah yes, the Russians.

of course Harry, because we all know you saw "the forensic evidence" yourself

what a poseur and a fraud you make, your line of thinking must work very well with your bling bling arab masters

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Who says there is no proof?

It's likely highly... (that's not enough?)

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Who says there is no proof?

TD CSI special ops team.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

TD CSI special ops team.

Well they would know eh.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Well they would know eh.

As much as anyone outside of the bought and paid for politicians who continue to claim but cannot provide any evidence of who was responsible.

Without showing their fingerprints all over it.

Originally Posted by OhOh

As much as anyone outside of the bought and paid for politicians who continue to claim but cannot provide any evidence of who was responsible.

Without showing their fingerprints all over it.

They've signed the Official Secrets Act. So they can't.