Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Member
    harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:26 PM
    Posts
    59,776

    NZ Fisheries want onboard CCTV censored

    New Zealand fisheries want grisly images of dead penguins caught in nets censored


    Industry leaders say plan to install cameras on commercial fishing vessels is a risk to ‘NZ Inc’


    The seafood industry in New Zealand has asked the government to withhold graphic video of dead sea life caught in trawler nets as they are potentially damaging to fisheries and to brand New Zealand.
    A letter from five seafood industry leaders to the Ministry of Primary Industries highlights the fisheries’ growing unease with the government’s proposal to install video cameras on all commercial fishing vessels to monitor bycatch of other species and illegal fish dumping.

    The letter requests an amendment to the Fisheries Act, so video captured onboard cannot be released to the general public through a freedom of information request, frequently used by the media, campaign groups and opposition parties.



    “They [the proposed videos] also raise significant risks for MPI and for ‘New Zealand Inc’,” the letter reads, also citing concerns about invading the privacy of employees onboard, and protecting commercial and trade secrets.
    ​There are no reliable figures on the numbers of penguins, sea lions, dolphins and seals that die in fishing nets or longlines in New Zealand, but according to some researchers and environmental groups the commercial fishing industry is the main culprit for declining populations of endangered sea lions and yellow-eyed penguins.

    Only 25% of deepwater trawlers in New Zealand have government observers onboard to record bycatch and discards, according to the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research [Niwa], which relies on statistical modelling techniques to generate bycatch estimates for the 75% of boats that work unobserved.

    Niwa estimates for every kilogram of reported target catch (what the fishing boat aims to catch )
    there is 0.2 kg of bycatch.

    “These are the images the fishing industry doesn’t want you to see,” said Forest & Bird’s chief executive Kevin Hague.
    “What they [the seafood industry] are saying is catching endangered penguins, dumping entire hauls of fish overboard and killing Hector’s dolphins looks really bad on TV. Well, the solution is to stop doing it, not to hide the evidence. It’s hard to think of a more credibility damaging activity than trying to change the law so the rest of us can’t see what’s really happening out there,”

    Deepwater fishing vessels account for 80% of New Zealand’s annual catch and earn NZ$650m per annum in export dollars.


    Stuart Anderson, director of fisheries management for MPI, said no decision had been made regarding the seafood industry’s proposed changes to what information the government should release about their practices at sea.


    “There are many elements to consider carefully in balancing the responsibilities of transparency and public interest while protecting privacy and other sensitive information” Anderson said.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-nets-censored



  2. #2
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    15,837
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    NZ$650m per annum in export dollars.
    I would think that's a bit low.
    Dunno.

    Of course there's going to be bycatch. No use hiding from it. My understanding is that the cameras are there to prevent illegal dumping which is a much bigger problem.

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat
    VocalNeal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:16 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    11,218
    Providing protein for humans to eat is a messy, unpleasant an inconvenient, for some, business. If 20% of the catch is bycatch then increase the quota by 20% and the fishermen will bring it all back. Warts and all. The bycatch can be sold for animal feed.
    NZ fisheries do not worry about such things and NZ fisheries will go under trying to be nice.
    Better to think inside the pub, than outside the box?
    I apologize if any offence was caused. unless it was intended.
    You people, you think I know feck nothing; I tell you: I know feck all
    Those who cannot change their mind, cannot change anything.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    15,837
    Quote Originally Posted by VocalNeal View Post
    If 20% of the catch is bycatch then increase the quota by 20% and the fishermen will bring it all back. Warts and all. The bycatch can be sold for animal feed.
    Yes, a logical and environmentally sound idea.
    The reason it's not implemented is that the fishermen will slyly target the bycatch.
    Quotas are set for target species. Non-target species are disallowed to encourage narrower fishing methods.
    It's the same with size restrictions. Small fish have to be dumped to encourage targetting larger fish.

    Definitely a self-defeating and wasteful set of regulations.

  5. #5
    Member
    harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:26 PM
    Posts
    59,776
    Small fish usually have to be dumped because otherwise they'd never get the chance to reach breeding age.

    But you're right, even if the Kiwis do their best to be careful, the fucking chinkies will be in there mopping up every fucker they can fit in the hold.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •