Thread: Building blocks of life found on ancient meteorites

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

the distances are so cosmic that light can never reach us from its furthest boundaries.

You're referring to the Particle Horizon.


It is the boundary between the observable and un-observable universe.

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

Even if we evolved into some supra being derived from photons we could never travel far or fast enough to get to that service station necessary for a fillip and a sausage buttie to tide us over on the voyage. The distances are simply too vast and in the end even time runs out.

Correct for our current level of knowledge and ability.

When we master the manipulation of time and space, can create wormholes etc, physical distance won't matter.


One or two advances in technology can bring a quantum leap of ability. The first man to fly could have met the first man to walk on the moon, they were both alive at the same time.

Originally Posted by Luigi

The first man to fly could have met the first man to walk on the moon

...Icarus, meet Michael Jackson...

Originally Posted by Luigi

One or two advances in technology can bring a quantum leap of ability. The first man to fly could have met the first man to walk on the moon, they were both alive at the same time.

Drivel, a puerile fantasy rooted more in Hollywood and Isaac Asimov than anything remotely approximating science. To achieve any such "quantum leap" would require the means of propulsion that can generate speeds of light and even then it's just too damn slow.

The means by which man has achieved travel to the Moon is founded on technology engineered from science established nigh on 500-600 years ago and has changed little.

"Wormholes", for fuck's sake, what are you, the bastard son of Dan Dare or what? Anyone might think you were an American with your cap on backasswards dribbling "awesome" every other sentence.

Twat!

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

o achieve any such "quantum leap" would require the means of propulsion that can generate speeds of light

You didn't read the post, did you.

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

Now, the longer we progress the bigger the universe seems to be getting and it is now thought that there are over 300 billion galaxies, each with 300 billion stars and the latest data seems to indicate that the distances are so cosmic that light can never reach us from its furthest boundaries.

Okay, here's the question:

What's the fastest thing in the universe?...

Red repo being returned.

Who is that member with the string of reds glaring on the dashboard?...He must be from the "far reaches"...

Oops...Sorry "Bob"...

Originally Posted by BaitongBoy

Who is that member with the string of reds glaring on the dashboard?...He must be from the "far reaches"...

Oops...Sorry "Bob"...

eh? Is that another one of your sadly bastardised quotes? What kind of sordid business are you on now? I mean man, whither goest thou? sucking that shiny black cock in the night?

Originally Posted by DrB0b

It is known that there are an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite amount of space for them to be in. However, not every one of them is inhabited. Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds. Any finite number divided by infinity is as near to nothing as makes no odds, so the average population of all the planets in the Universe can be said to be zero. From this it follows that the population of the whole Universe is also zero, and that any people you may meet from time to time are merely the products of a deranged imagination.

I think when Douglas Adams penned that the theories about the expanding universe were not what they are today.
And he was a fiction writer.
Pity you didn't know that when you passed off his words as yours.

oh for fucks sake, there are not enough facepalm memes in the entire universe to even begin to indicate my dismay at the cosmic levels of sheer blockheaded stupidity you display. You have to be a luigi sockpuppet, there is no possible way you are a real person.

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

Drivel, a puerile fantasy rooted more in Hollywood and Isaac Asimov than anything remotely approximating science. To achieve any such "quantum leap" would require the means of propulsion that can generate speeds of light and even then it's just too damn slow.

The means by which man has achieved travel to the Moon is founded on technology engineered from science established nigh on 500-600 years ago and has changed little.

"Wormholes", for fuck's sake, what are you, the bastard son of Dan Dare or what? Anyone might think you were an American with your cap on backasswards dribbling "awesome" every other sentence.

Twat!

There's a couple of flaws in you post. Wormholes have nothing to do with quantum physics (yet). Two diferent theories...perhaps.
Lulu is right to talk about wormholes, but wrong to say "when". At this stage it's so theoretical and fraught with unkown dangers that it would have been better to say "if".
You're right he's a twat. He's desperately trying to appear smart after being shown up as lacking logic or scientific reasoning. He maintains he can prove something without being in possession of all the data. One can not reach a reliable conclusion without all the information pertaining to the subject at hand.
He redeems himself here, "Correct for our current level of knowledge and ability." but sadly doesn't put that into practice for himself.

What are you blethering on about. I never claimed fucking 'wormholes' were anything to do with quantum physics, I was simply quoting Mao in deriding his silly puerility.

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

deriding his silly puerility

...failed alliteration...try "pilloring his silly puerility"...

Puerilling his silly deriding.

Originally Posted by tomcat

...failed alliteration...try "pilloring his silly puerility"...

Severely slighting his simplistic silliness. Pooh-poohing his persistently puerile posts.

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

What are you blethering on about. I never claimed fucking 'wormholes' were anything to do with quantum physics, I was simply quoting Mao in deriding his silly puerility.

Before you say "blethering", I think you need to read again what you wrote and to be fair on how people read it.
But yes, once again, Mao is a twat. Baldrick said it, you said it, two intelligent members concur (and me).

Originally Posted by Luigi

Puerilling his silly deriding.

He was referring to you, dimwit.

Originally Posted by DrB0b

Severely slighting his simplistic silliness. Pooh-poohing his persistently puerile posts.

See above, failed jump-on-the-bandwagon sycophant.

Originally Posted by tomcat

...failed alliteration...try "pilloring his silly puerility"...

Oh dear, as you have so vividly demonstrated, alliteration in the wrong hands is a clumsy technique indeed and indicative of the callow litterateur lolling in the lap of limpid lays.

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

callow litterateur lolling in the lap of limpid lays

...fail: wordy...keep alliterative ornamentation short, sharp and shimmery...

Bob is a fooking nutter...A few building blocks short of a life...Heh...

Originally Posted by BaitongBoy

A few building blocks short of being

...alliteratively alive alternative...