Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    ENT is offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online

    UK flight ban on electronic devices announced

    The UK ban applies to direct inbound flights from six countries; the US ban lists eight countries
    The British government has announced a cabin baggage ban on laptops on direct passenger flights to the UK from Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Tunisia and Saudi Arabia.

    The ban, which also applies to tablets and DVD players, follows a similar US move affecting eight countries.
    Downing Street said it followed talks on air security and was "necessary, effective and proportionate".
    US officials said bombs could be hidden in a series of devices.
    The ban applies to any device larger than 16cm long, 9.3cm wide or 1.5cm deep. It includes smart phones, but most fall inside these limits.

    Any affected device, including e-readers and games consoles, will need to be placed into hold luggage.
    Number 10 said it was up to individual airlines to decide when to begin enforcing the ban and passengers should contact their airline for more information.

    Which airlines are affected?
    Six UK carriers:
    British Airways
    Thomas Cook

    Eight overseas carriers:
    Turkish Airlines
    Pegasus Airways
    Atlas-Global Airlines
    Middle East Airlines
    Royal Jordanian
    Tunis Air

    Transport Secretary Chris Grayling said: "We understand the frustration that these measures may cause and we are working with the aviation industry to minimise any impact."

    Air industry consultant John Strickland said the ban would cause "headaches for airlines and customers", but carriers had "no choice but to put security first".
    What are the new rules?

    Simon Calder, travel editor of the Independent, told the BBC the ban would particularly affect passengers who booked cheaper, hand luggage-only tickets, but would now have to pay to check a bag in.
    He added that about 1,000 UK-bound passengers used Turkish Airlines every day to fly from long-haul destinations and would also be affected as their planes were routed via Istanbul.

    While the US government cited unspecified "threats" in its announcement, the prime minister's official spokesman declined to discuss whether the new rules were prompted by specific intelligence.

    The US ban applies to flights from 10 airports in eight countries. Nine airlines are affected - Royal Jordanian, EgyptAir, Turkish Airlines, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Kuwait Airways, Royal Air Maroc, Qatar Airways, Emirates and Etihad Airways.
    Asked why the US ban differed from the UK, Theresa May's spokesman said: "We have each taken our own decisions."

    This is a controversial decision, and, I'm told, not an easy one for the government.
    The UK ban goes even further than the US move which does not affect national carriers.
    It is not the result of a specific, identified terrorist plot, but of mounting concern in US and British intelligence circles at the ongoing interest amongst jihadist groups in the Middle East in blowing up a passenger plane in mid-air.
    There are some in Whitehall who fear this may be an over-reaction, with damaging commercial and diplomatic consequences. But others have pointed to last year's laptop bomb smuggled onto a flight from Somalia by insurgents from Al-Shabaab.

    The year before, so-called Islamic State blew up a Russian passenger plane over the Sinai Peninsula. But that bomb was hidden in the hold, where laptops and other devices will still be allowed.
    The editor of Aviation Security International, Philip Baum, told the BBC that "encouraging people to check laptops, and other such items, into the luggage hold simply makes the challenge of screening even harder".

    For more than two years, the official UK threat level for international terrorism has stood at severe, meaning an attack is "highly likely".
    In July 2014, passengers at UK airports were advised to ensure electronic devices were charged so they could be switched on for security checks.

    The ban on liquids over 100ml in hand luggage - introduced after a foiled 2006 plot to blow up planes using explosives hidden in drink bottles - also remains in place.
    'Evaluated intelligence'

    The US has given airlines 96 hours, beginning at 07:00 GMT on Tuesday, to implement its ban, which officials said had no end date.
    Passengers on some 50 flights a day from some of the busiest hubs in the Middle East, Turkey and North Africa will be affected.

    The Turkish government has said the US ban is wrong and should be reversed.

    But the Department of Homeland Security said extremists were seeking "innovative methods" to bring down jets.
    Citing the Somalia incident in February 2016, as well as the 2015 downing of a Russian airline in Egypt and attacks at airports in Brussels and Istanbul, it added: "Evaluated intelligence indicates that terrorist groups continue to target commercial aviation, to include smuggling explosive devices in various consumer items."

    Which airports are affected by the US ban?
    Airports affected by electronics ban
    Mohammed V International, Casablanca, Morocco
    Ataturk Airport, Istanbul, Turkey
    Cairo International Airport, Egypt
    Queen Alia International, Amman, Jordan
    King Abdulaziz International, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
    King Khalid International, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    Kuwait International Airport
    Hamad International, Doha, Qatar
    Abu Dhabi International, United Arab Emirates
    Dubai International, United Arab Emirates

    UK flight ban on electronic devices announced - BBC News
    “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I said, you are gods’? John 10:34.

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat
    Slick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    Intelligently left out UAE and Qatar.

    Wish like fuck they will do the same in the USA but looks like nope.

    2 Major hubs and its transit passengers are gonna be assfucked by this stupid horseshit.

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    18-08-2019 @ 04:25 PM
    Typical over reaction and a bullshit exercise in bolstering Trump's racist policies. These faux security alerts certainly do the trick in expediting Big Brother controls whilst suppressing legitimate concerns about privacy and freedoms.

    The attitude struck by the bitch May is somewhat typical of her secrecy led management style of authoritarianism which of course simply helps to conceal the fact she's a blinkered, sclerotic old crone without an original idea in her head.

    There is no specific threat. The threat is vague, diffused and resolves to a bunch of incoherent, ill-resourced fuckwits who want to kill people for no rational reason.

    So what's new.

  4. #4
    Not a Mod.
    Begbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    Lagrangian Point
    Fly via Amsterdam. It's stress free.

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat
    Slick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    Quote Originally Posted by Begbie
    Fly via Amsterdam. It's stress free.
    Until the prices are 5 times what they normally would be.

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat
    VocalNeal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 09:23 AM
    or via Vienna on Austrian.

  7. #7
    harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:06 AM

  8. #8
    Thailand Expat
    OhOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Online
    21-08-2019 @ 10:38 AM
    Where troubles melt like lemon drops

    The Russian looks interested.

    The ME airlines offer a more relaxing alternative.

    Last edited by OhOh; 24-03-2017 at 11:21 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts