Thread: China Blocks UN Resolution to Curb Lead in Paint

NAIROBI—
China blocked a much-anticipated United Nations resolution to curb lead in paint during last-ditch negotiations at the U.N. Environment Assembly (UNEA) in Nairobi.

A campaign to phase out lead paint in developing countries was high on the agenda at last week’s global "parliament of the environment."

China was the only country on Friday to reject a proposed section to “encourage” governments to adopt anti-lead paint laws. As a result, a broad U.N. resolution to limit chemicals and waste worldwide contained no reference to lead paint.

“Due to the action of a single country with a lead paint problem who objected, [the U.N. Environment Assembly] was unable to even 'encourage' actions to eliminate lead paint – a product that causes permanent brain damage and costs nearly $1 trillion each year,” said Joseph DiGangi, science and technical adviser for IPEN, a global anti-toxics nonprofit present at the assembly.

Lead exposure can lead to permanent brain damage in young children if paint chips are eaten or paint dust is inhaled.

Decreased IQ (intelligence quotient) in children due to lead poisoning represents a $977 billion economic loss in developing countries, according to a report from New York University’s medical school released during the UNEA.

In China, 16 million children under the age of 5 are exposed to lead poisoning with an estimated economic cost of $227 billion each year.

In the majority of developing countries, there are no laws regulating the amount of lead in paint, according to a study from the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).

The United States limits lead in paint to no more than 90 parts per million.

But tests in the developing world found lead levels of 10,000 to 100,000 parts per million in decorative paint used in homes, schools, hospitals and other buildings.

Lead exposure leads to lower IQ and decreases in lifetime earning potential.

Researchers estimated the correlated economic loss in Africa is $134.7 billion, or 4.03 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in the region; $699.9 billion in Asia, or 1.88 percent of GDP; and $142.3 billion in Latin America and the Caribbean, or 2.04 percent of GDP.

Excluding lead in paint from the U.N. resolution is a disappointing blow for policymakers. However, many developing countries are already drafting new regulations on lead paint as part of the Global Alliance to End Lead Paint by 2020.

The alliance, launched in 2009, is a voluntary partnership of governments, nongovernmental organizations and agencies such as UNEP, the World Health Organization and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

With support from the alliance, Sri Lanka, Philippines, Nepal and Thailand have enacted new laws limiting lead in paint. India and Bangladesh are finalizing draft regulations.

“Things have moved really, really fast,” said Sara Brosché, manager for IPEN’s Global Lead Paint Elimination Campaign. “Once industry is aware of the situation, they wanted to move quickly on these issues, as did policymakers and civil society.”

Fifteen African countries, including Kenya and Ethiopia, are already forming new regulations expected to be finalized this year.

“Unless we do something now, then we are exposing our children to serious danger,” said Allan Meso of UNEP’s environmental law division in Nairobi. Meso attended a meeting of African partners in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in December.

Industry must be included “to sensitize them and make them aware,” Meso said. “It’s not about attacking industry -- bringing them on board is essential. The deadline of 2020 isn’t beyond reach. It is achievable. We just need political will and we’ll push it through.”

Lack of awareness about the health threats of lead paint is a major hurdle. Lack of expertise in testing as well as regulating informal paint makers are also challenges.

But substituting lead in paint with safe alternatives is relatively simple and inexpensive.

“You can buy safe paint or poison paint and they cost about the same,” said Walker Smith, director of global affairs and policy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “We go to countries and can explain to them what this does to children, including the leaders’ children.”

Paint company Bosco voluntarily phased out lead in paint in 2013 and became the first lead-free paint maker in East Africa.

The company did not need to retrofit equipment, and did not increase the retail price of its lead-free paint, instead absorbing the extra 10 to 12 percent in costs to make it, said Santosh Pawar who works in research and development for Bosco in Kenya.

China Blocks UN Resolution to Curb Lead in Paint

Originally Posted by misskit

Decreased IQ (intelligence quotient) in children due to lead poisoning represents a $977 billion economic loss in developing countries, according to a report from New York University’s medical school released during the UNEA.

I wonder how they arrive at these figures.

When I were a lad at school it is was realised that we were all being poisoned by chewing the ends of our pencils, which at that time were all painted in nice bright colours. Maybe that explains why I am so dumb now. A class action suit against the board of education is called for. I want a slice of that 977 Billion I have been deprived of.

These Chinese are irresponsible to the extreme. Horrible kunts.

"In China, 16 million children under the age of 5 are exposed to lead poisoning with an estimated economic cost of $227 billion each year."

PLUS;

"substituting lead in paint with safe alternatives is relatively simple and inexpensive."

Doesn't seem to make sense. Considering that China rejected even recommending less lead to governments, let alone an outright ban, I guess China has an awful lot of money tied up in lead mines.
Can't think of anything else, considering the two quotes above.

It's possible those commies misunderstood it.....to be a ban on "Red" paint, yes.

They're still producing long-banned Paraquat in the UK for Chinese farming / pesticidal use.
HSE not a big deal yet in good old China.