Thread: Sir Cliff Richard file sent to Crown Prosecution Service

Prosecutors have received a file of evidence regarding the singer Sir Cliff Richard and allegations of historical sexual assault, the BBC has learned.
The Crown Prosecution Service said it will now make a decision as to whether to bring charges or not.



Sir Cliff, 75, was interviewed in 2014 and 2015 by South Yorkshire Police investigating a claim of a sex crime involving a young boy in the 1980s.
The singer has never been arrested, and has always denied the claims.

His spokesman said: "It would be inappropriate to comment while the matter is under review."
Voluntarily
A CPS spokesman said: "We have received a full file of evidence from South Yorkshire Police.
"We will now carefully consider its contents in line with the Code for Crown Prosecutors, in order to establish whether there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction, and whether it is in the public interest to do so."
A South Yorkshire Police spokeswoman said: "Investigation files relating to allegations of non-recent sexual abuse involving a 75-year-old man have been handed over to the CPS.
"The CPS will now consider the matter and South Yorkshire Police awaits their decision."

Sir Cliff has been interviewed twice in connection with the allegations and has met officers voluntarily each time. He has never been arrested.
The first interview in August 2014 followed a high-profile police search of his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire. He was then reinterviewed in November 2015.

Sir Cliff Richard file sent to Crown Prosecution Service - BBC News

Lost count of how many reds i have received for repeatedly naming this nonce as a rank low grade pedofile.

Originally Posted by Chittychangchang

Sir Cliff, 75,

What is he dying of? They have waited and waited so he must be at deaths door.

Some old boy 101 yrs old is standing trial somewhere now in the UK.

Originally Posted by Chittychangchang

whether it is in the public interest to do so."

Somebody will put a kind word in for him. Maybe Charles could step in.

It's in the public interest!

Also the victims need justice and this fooker needs to be brought to justice and made an example off, especially this coont who has made his living out off being squeaky clean and selling records on the back off god bothering.

Rot In Pieces

Sir Cliff has been interviewed twice in connection with the allegations and has met officers voluntarily each time. He has never been arrested.
The first interview in August 2014 followed a high-profile police search of his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire.

I found it rather interesting that Cliff Richard put his house up for sale immediately after the police search of his house.

Kinda gay really.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Sir Cliff has been interviewed twice in connection with the allegations and has met officers voluntarily each time. He has never been arrested.
The first interview in August 2014 followed a high-profile police search of his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire.

I found it rather interesting that Cliff Richard put his house up for sale immediately after the police search of his house.

Didn't he ditch his UK passport and move to Barbados?

Struck me as an attempt at moving out of range of the long arm of the law.

Always thought he was sus.

Originally Posted by bobo746

Always thought he was sus.

Like finding out the pope is catholic

Cliff had a season ticket to the Elm Street guest house, one of the Pedo party houses enjoyed by the elites and snr politicians. It is there that senior Tories raped children in the company of a couple of senior members of the IRA, with the spooks guarding the door outside. The only controversy about it is whether the spooks knew that they were raping kids together, as opposed to simply supposed antagonists in the Irish Troubles simply partying together. They certainly were not working on the peace process, that's for sure.

Cliff's code name was Kitty. His rent boy boyfriend that he usually took tot he parties was code names Gladys.

Originally Posted by bobo746

Always thought he was sus.

Yep was always creeping around in the shadows

For those of you into Karma. Cliff's film debut was in a movie called Serious Charge!

of course pseudolus, without any real evidence, without a court case and conviction, with only hearsay, you are quite happy to condemn this man as a pedo, and calling the loon on the thai 9/11 thread a nonce based on his appearance.

are you attempting some kind of humour, or do you really condemn people before the facts are known and in open court, as opposed to hearsay websites of debateable accuracy.

can you not see you are exhibiting the same lynch mob mentality you accuse the daily mail and its journalists and readership of on the islam and terrorist threads.

your selective hypocrisy is astounding, but hardly surprising.

MEGA LULZ Tax

You will be saying that LORD JANNER, Jimmy Savile etc were not PEdos next?

Originally Posted by taxexile

without a court case and conviction, with only hearsay

Hearsay? Some call it hearsay, others call it victim testimonies. I tend to side with the victims rather than the pedo's, pal. Just because the establishment are keeping this in the bottle.

Chass will be along soon to Red me again. He does every time I say Cliff is a nonce.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Cliff's code name was Kitty. His rent boy boyfriend that he usually took tot he parties was code names Gladys.

Strange that, cuz Rod Stewart's pet name for Elton John is also Gladys.

You will be saying that LORD JANNER, Jimmy Savile etc were not PEdos next?

why.

this thread is about richard, and for one so concerned about facts and accurate reportage on other matters you are quite happy to come to a conclusion based on little more than daily mail style hearsay on this one.

Richard by name Dick by nature.

Why release this story, what's this government trying to cover up.

Originally Posted by taxexile

of course pseudolus, without any real evidence, without a court case and conviction, with only hearsay, you are quite happy to condemn this man as a pedo, and calling the loon on the thai 9/11 thread a nonce based on his appearance.

are you attempting some kind of humour, or do you really condemn people before the facts are known and in open court, as opposed to hearsay websites of debateable accuracy.

can you not see you are exhibiting the same lynch mob mentality you accuse the daily mail and its journalists and readership of on the islam and terrorist threads.

your selective hypocrisy is astounding, but hardly surprising.

Have to wonder how quick the British authorities would proceed if Cliff was an everyday guy accused of the same? Dragging their feet, delaying the process, surface investigations, etc.....

Universal truths are that influential, elite, and high celebrity types are treated/looked upon differently than the common souls.

Originally Posted by taxexile

You will be saying that LORD JANNER, Jimmy Savile etc were not PEdos next?

why.

this thread is about richard, and for one so concerned about facts and accurate reportage on other matters you are quite happy to come to a conclusion based on little more than daily mail style hearsay on this one.

Why? Because both janner and savile never saw justice because the witness statements against them were hidden by the higher up nonces, or derided by idiots like you.

Originally Posted by taxexile

of course pseudolus, without any real evidence, without a court case and conviction, with only hearsay, you are quite happy to condemn this man as a pedo, and calling the loon on the thai 9/11 thread a nonce based on his appearance.

<ahem> allahu akbar </ahem>

Cis male posing as asexual.

One surmises that the Old Bill have sufficient corroborating/similar stories from multiple non-related parties to assemble a case.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by taxexile

You will be saying that LORD JANNER, Jimmy Savile etc were not PEdos next?

why.

this thread is about richard, and for one so concerned about facts and accurate reportage on other matters you are quite happy to come to a conclusion based on little more than daily mail style hearsay on this one.

Why? Because both janner and savile never saw justice because the witness statements against them were hidden by the higher up nonces, or derided by idiots like you.

Are you referring to Lord Janner and Sir Jimmy Savile. Their should still be referred to by their titles.

Lets not let our standards drop, as they dropped theirs

Originally Posted by CR7CristianoRonaldo

Cis male posing as asexual.

One surmises that the Old Bill have sufficient corroborating/similar stories from multiple non-related parties to assemble a case.

one of the law changes made by the protecctors of Pedos is that the CPS now judges which cases should be prosecuted, rather than the police.

The Police used to be able to assemble a case and take it to the CPS and say "Prosecute him". But now the CPS can say NO. This is a double sure way of stopping the nonses being slung in prison. The elite can stop it with their black and white square brigade in the forces, but if it gets past them, the CPS can stop it.

The fact that cliff is about to be done shows that he has a serious illness and will be dead soon.