Thread: Julian Assange Wins Round 2

If he comes out then, I imagine the US will go after him.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by billy the kid

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

If he comes out,

fooked if he does and fooked if he doesn't.

Well technically he'll be in the clear in 2020 when the statue of limitations runs out on the rape charge.

... and this would be proof enoough of his guilt.

Originally Posted by can123

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by billy the kid

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

If he comes out,

fooked if he does and fooked if he doesn't.

Well technically he'll be in the clear in 2020 when the statue of limitations runs out on the rape charge.

... and this would be proof enoough of his guilt.

And you draw that conclusion how?

Most people think the charges are bogus.

14 August 2010
"Miss A" and Mr Assange attend a seminar by the Social Democrats' Brotherhood Movement on "War and the role of media", at which the Wikileaks founder is the key speaker. The two reportedly have sex that night.

17 August 2010
Mr Assange reportedly has sex with a woman he met at the seminar on 14 August, identified as "Miss W".

Some time between 17 and 20 August, "Miss W" and "Miss A" are in contact and apparently share with a journalist the concerns they have about aspects of their respective sexual encounters with Mr Assange

Wouldn't you go to the police?

Weird when lots of women in Sweden are harassed and abused, raped
and the cops are told to do nowt.
But when it comes to Assange who allegedly poked her in the morning after a previous night of shagging gets to face a life sentence in America for his troubles.

The charges are bogus and most everything associated manufactured by them.

Yet, many are drinking the elixir of Kool-Aid.

Originally Posted by thaimeme

The charges are bogus and most everything associated manufactured by them.

How do you know that they are bogus ? What if he is a rapist ? Some people think he believes he is above the law and is relying on Wikileaks to buy his immunity.

I do not know if he is guilty or innocent yet some members here have made up their minds without having the least idea of the evidence.

Originally Posted by can123

Originally Posted by thaimeme

The charges are bogus and most everything associated manufactured by them.

How do you know that they are bogus ? What if he is a rapist ? Some people think he believes he is above the law and is relying on Wikileaks to buy his immunity.

I do not know if he is guilty or innocent yet some members here have made up their minds without having the least idea of the evidence.

I showed you some evidence.

They didn't "know" they'd been raped until they spoke to a journalist a few days later.

What does that tell you?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I showed you some evidence. They didn't "know" they'd been raped until they spoke to a journalist a few days later. What does that tell you? harrybarracuda is online now Add to harrybarracuda's Reputation Report Post

It tells me that you are typical of the Bessies who can be found on this group. A farang fatality in Thailand is adjudicated upon by guys who post individual hypotheses until, by the end of a page, they are able to say exactly why he died, who killed him and what he had for breakfast.

You have absolutely no knowledge of the evidence behind the possible charges in the case and yet you come to a judgment.

I don't know the evidence either but I accept readily that Assange is hiding from justice.

Yes, it is silly to postulate without ever hearing the evidence, ALL the evidence. But then again, there are many silly individuals around.

What if the sun does not come up tomorrow?

UN says he has been held without charge, he cannot be charged until he has been interviewed.
He refuses to be interviewed.
European arrest warrant for alleged sex crimes, UK has no choice but to comply to Swedens request.
Sweden does not extradite for political crimes but it might deport him to his home country (Australia) Would Australia go along with the US wishes ?

Don't think he'd even make it to Australia as the Americans would be on his tail and escorting the plane to a jail somewhere.

Originally Posted by can123

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I showed you some evidence. They didn't "know" they'd been raped until they spoke to a journalist a few days later. What does that tell you? harrybarracuda is online now Add to harrybarracuda's Reputation Report Post

It tells me that you are typical of the Bessies who can be found on this group. A farang fatality in Thailand is adjudicated upon by guys who post individual hypotheses until, by the end of a page, they are able to say exactly why he died, who killed him and what he had for breakfast.

You have absolutely no knowledge of the evidence behind the possible charges in the case and yet you come to a judgment.

I don't know the evidence either but I accept readily that Assange is hiding from justice.

I haven't come to a judgement, but I find it odd that they didn't know they'd been raped until they spoke to each other. I think you'd pretty well know at the time wouldn't you?

And then, when they decided they'd been raped, they went to a journalist, not the police.

Would you not think a crime should be reported to the police as soon as possible?

And thirdly, he has always made himself available to the Swedish for police interview, but they have refused to participate.

Would you not think this is reasonable?

But unfortunately, this all appears to have flown over your head.

Did your mother have Zika?

Originally Posted by Bower

UN says he has been held without charge, he cannot be charged until he has been interviewed.
He refuses to be interviewed.

That's horseshit.

Assange’s lawyers have repeatedly offered to let him be interviewed by Swedish prosecutors at the Ecuadorean Embassy, which has granted him political asylum, but those offers were rejected.

Originally Posted by OhOh

The Swedes have to re-submit their interview request and the questioner will be an Ecuador citizen who will ask the questions submitted by the Swedish authorities in advance.

He now refuses that after the UN panel decided that he has been unlawfully detained. He really doesn't want to be freed from the rape accusations, they are his key to a room on the Ecuadorian embassy.

Originally Posted by Bower

UN says he has been held without charge, he cannot be charged until he has been interviewed.
He refuses to be interviewed.

He is not being held.
Imagine the Swedish prosecutor dropping the case so that he can leave the embassy without being arrested by British police, the sky would fall down on him.
He is Mr NowhereToGo

I watched him on the news , on the embassy balcony telling the UK and Swedish governments what to do, when heckled he called for 'some to take him (the heckler) out.
He clearly isn't so keen on free speech when it's directed at him.
Most people that have been in contact with him in the UK seem to lose any liking for the man and find him arrogant.

D

Originally Posted by Bower

I watched him on the news ,

didn't know he had 3 kids and i assume a wife.

If he does have a wife i don't think she'll be too welcoming.
Maybe with a frying wok.

Originally Posted by OhOh

You may, if you want to be informed prior to you being unmasked as a complete tosser, look for it, it's available verbatim.

Any "evidence" in the public domain is just hearsay and gossip. I am not a complete tosser. As for the rest of your post, I recommend that you rewrite it as in its present form it is unintelligible.

Originally Posted by can123

Originally Posted by OhOh

You may, if you want to be informed prior to you being unmasked as a complete tosser, look for it, it's available verbatim.

Any "evidence" in the public domain is just hearsay and gossip. I am not a complete tosser. As for the rest of your post, I recommend that you rewrite it as in its present form it is unintelligible.

You may like to read this article.
How did the UN get it so wrong on Julian Assange?| Joshua Rozenberg | Opinion | The Guardian

As for us OhOh's insults zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

^

Thank you but I have read other similar items. I believe the government is correct and the so-called UN adjudication is a load of bollocks. Harry The Fish should read your quoted item.

Originally Posted by can123

^

Thank you but I have read other similar items. I believe the government is correct and the so-called UN adjudication is a load of bollocks. Harry The Fish should read your quoted item.

Er, I think the adjudication is a load of bollocks, and if you pulled your head out of your arse you would have seen where I said it's a waste of money.

But if you read the rest of the story, you'd also realise that the continuance of the charges, which were ready to be dropped, stinks of political interference.

However, he's only got another four years and they can't get him on the remaining "rape" charge anyway.

But I've also said they'll get him on something else.

They want this boy in a supermax and I don't think they give a shit how they do it.

Once he's in the US he can forget yuman rights.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Once he's in the US he can forget yuman rights.

Judging by his behaviour when he was heckled I don't think he's a very nice bloke. It is alleged he is a rapist so I hope he gets what he deserves.

Originally Posted by can123

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Once he's in the US he can forget yuman rights.

Judging by his behaviour when he was heckled I don't think he's a very nice bloke. It is alleged he is a rapist so I hope he gets what he deserves.

So essentially what you are saying is that you are a hypocritical, judgemental bastard.

Now I understand.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

So essentially what you are saying is that you are a hypocritical, judgemental bastard. Now I understand.

Now, look here, Fishface, I am perfectly entitled to be judgmental because I am better informed than you are.

Originally Posted by can123

I recommend that you rewrite it as in its present form it is unintelligible.

If English is not your first language I apologise. If it is I would suggest you may want a Remedial English Course, wherever you are in the world there will be someone to assit you.

Originally Posted by Bower

You may like to read this article.

"Assange has always been free to leave the embassy at any time. Of course, he knew he would be arrested for breach of his bail conditions. Of course, he knew he would face extradition to Sweden. Of course, he knew that he might face extradition to the United States once proceedings in Sweden were at an end. But that does not mean he was detained, and still less that his detention was of an arbitrary character."

I have read your article and would suggest that fleeing to a safe haven, when threatened with abduction by a known terrorist state, is an example of intelligence. Whilst in his safe haven the safe haven was surrounded by UK armed police, "probably", as such he quite rightly feared fro his life.

That is unlawful "arbitrarily detention" by the UK Government. He has not been charged with any offense by anyone, he is not a fugitive from the law. He has on many occasions informed the Swedish prosecutor of his willingness to answer any questions that they may wish to receive answers on.

Until the Swedish authorities issue their questions, receive the answers and conclude whether or not he is to be charged with an offense, he is a free man. That is if the UK, Sweden and the Ameristn had not threatened to extradite him to wherever the nearest rendition centre is located. As they have done many times before, to other innocent people, worldwide.

Or are you suggesting that none of the above will take place because the UK, Sweden and Ameristan are such civilised countries governed by such famously fair politicians. The "fugitive" has shown he has no faith in any of the three countries legal system and has rightly taken steps to ensure he will not be summarily executed on the streets of London.

Have you not read of results of "accidents" in the UK or Ameritan where policemen, or some such disguised shooter, shoots an innocent member of the public? Of course the shooters apologise and are taken out of action immediately, but the dead person is no longer free.