Thread: Queen Nazi salute film: Palace 'disappointed' at use

Originally Posted by Begbie

Are you a taxi driver chas?.

The quote is from another poster on another forum.
The debate created by Murdoch is exactly why his rag published it. Most are too thick to see that far.

Originally Posted by VocalNeal

Being the Senior Service < http://www.navy-net.co.uk/community/...w.65051/page-1> is much more subdued and refined.

Can't argue with that

Originally Posted by Horatio Hornblower

Personal attacks your pretty well known for them

You proved me right. You have nothing relevant to add.

Perhaps they've got a hold of the Antony Blunt papers.

Originally Posted by Begbie

Originally Posted by chassamui

I'm as left wing as any in this site and I see the Royals as nothing but positive for the country

Are you a taxi driver chas?.

Bit of a storm in a teacup, the main gripe is that the establishment seems to be more concerned about a home movie from the royal archive being released to public view than what was on the movie.

What's strange is that the UK newspapers including the Sun generally toe the line with regards news about the royal family. Minor tittle tattle is ok but no big scandals. Is this a diversion?

Originally Posted by Begbie

Here's a picture of the England football team visiting Berlin in 1938, long after nearly everyone had discovered what the Nazis were actually like.

What a difference 2 years made.

Originally Posted by BobR

Originally Posted by Begbie

Here's a picture of the England football team visiting Berlin in 1938, long after nearly everyone had discovered what the Nazis were actually like.

What a difference 2 years made.

Are England in their lucky red away strip.

Originally Posted by chassamui

Originally Posted by Begbie

Are you a taxi driver chas?.

The quote is from another poster on another forum.
The debate created by Murdoch is exactly why his rag published it. Most are too thick to see that far.

Anyone who thinks the leaches are positive for the UK is in no position to question someone else's intelligence.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Anyone who thinks the leaches are positive for the UK is in no position to question someone else's intelligence.

I assume you mean the Royals? In which case you are being ironic. It has been shown beyond doubt that they are a positive for the UK both fiancially and in building business and diplomatic soft power abroad.
You are entitled to your opinion even when it is demonstrably incorrect.

Originally Posted by chassamui

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Anyone who thinks the leaches are positive for the UK is in no position to question someone else's intelligence.

I assume you mean the Royals? In which case you are being ironic. It has been shown beyond doubt that they are a positive for the UK both fiancially and in building business and diplomatic soft power abroad.
You are entitled to your opinion even when it is demonstrably incorrect.

Shown by who? Corporate mainstream media perchance?

Sucker
\

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Shown by who? Corporate mainstream media perchance?

Surely a man of your calibre can do beter than that.

Originally Posted by chassamui

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Shown by who? Corporate mainstream media perchance?

Surely a man of your calibre can do beter than that.

Maybe, but it is not really necessary. The question that no royal loving kneeler has an answer for is this;

To get close to the royals in a meaningful way, a person needs clearance by the spooks. So just why would they hang around and be so tight with prolific pedo Jimmy S? The special close friendship he had with Charlie?





Rotten to the core the whole lot of them. They knew all about him and for some reason allowed the children of their subjects to get raped and molested.

I bet you believe all the bollocks about them being poor as well "Ohhh the queen is running out of money"

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by chassamui

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Shown by who? Corporate mainstream media perchance?

Surely a man of your calibre can do beter than that.

Maybe, but it is not really necessary. The question that no royal loving kneeler has an answer for is this;

To get close to the royals in a meaningful way, a person needs clearance by the spooks. So just why would they hang around and be so tight with prolific pedo Jimmy S? The special close friendship he had with Charlie?





Rotten to the core the whole lot of them. They knew all about him and for some reason allowed the children of their subjects to get raped and molested.

I bet you believe all the bollocks about them being poor as well "Ohhh the queen is running out of money"

You are a Daily Mail journalist and I claim my free Kardasian Calendar.

Originally Posted by chassamui

building business and diplomatic soft power abroad.

Germany really struggles in this regard. You might be right.

Don't forget Tourism as well - that is the other old canard chucked out by the cap doffers "Ohhhh the royals are so good for tourism" whilst in France there is a trail of distraught tourists at the top of the Eiffel Tower saying "nahhh we won't be coming back here again. Just not very good here, being that there is not a group of parasitic krouts steeling money and land from the people of this country wearing enough gold and gems to feed the poor".

Daily Mail? I shit em.

Opinion and facts are different. Neither will change so prolly best to move on.

Originally Posted by chassamui

Opinion and facts are different. Neither will change so prolly best to move on.

So it is only an opinion then that with out a parasite in an poncy crown that Germany is doing better than the UK and has done for years? Opinion?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

So it is only an opinion then that with out a parasite in an poncy crown that Germany is doing better than the UK and has done for years? Opinion?

Pre or post greek bailout? Arguable I know, so let's move on.

Originally Posted by chassamui

Originally Posted by pseudolus

So it is only an opinion then that with out a parasite in an poncy crown that Germany is doing better than the UK and has done for years? Opinion?

Pre or post greek bailout? Arguable I know, so let's move on.

Matters not - the greek bail out is the private banks creating money out of thin air, giving it to greece, who then give it straight back to the private banks to pay off the last loans, except with more interest added on top. A good little earner as they asset strip the country.

All very childish this need to justify feudal knobs. Both betty's sons hangs about with pedo's (Savile and Epstein). Eddie is just a little weird; inbreeding gone too far with that lad.

Actually Chass - you are a genius.

In order to sure up the Euro, and as they give so much value to the UK in business, lets give half of them to the Germans to help them pay off the Greeks, and as some persist in the illusion that Phil is a greek ( ) lets give the other half to the Greeks. It would be a win win win all all concerned. The germans would improve their businesses even more. The Greeks would magically turn into a world class business center, and the UK would not have these leeches sucking off the life blood of the country any more.

Genius. A knighthood for Chass.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

parasite in an poncy crown that Germany is doing better than the UK and has done for years? Opinion?

What about an unpopular parasite in a white house. Any better? Any cheaper?

Who is the German President anyway?

Originally Posted by VocalNeal

Originally Posted by pseudolus

parasite in an poncy crown that Germany is doing better than the UK and has done for years? Opinion?

What about an unpopular parasite in a white house. Any better? Any cheaper?

Who is the German President anyway?

The white house holds the puppet of the parasites on the world, some of which are in the headline of the thread.

Just a thought.

If Britain lost the royals then there would no longer be a "Royal" navy it would be the British navy.

The ships would no longer be HMS Daring it would be BS Daring?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

History is wonderful? The mass media not so...

Can anyone prove that Charles and Phillip knew anything about Jimmy's dalliances at the time those pictures were taken?

Originally Posted by VocalNeal

Just a thought.

If Britain lost the royals then there would no longer be a "Royal" navy it would be the British navy.

The ships would no longer be HMS Daring it would be BS Daring?

Moot point really. Cameron, in his bid to destroy the last vestments of the British Forces and make the UK 100% dependent upon and paying for the European Army has make great strides towards making the Navy able to fit onto a duck pond.

Removing HM from all services though would be a very good thing indeed with all these knobs being above the law. About time they are their mates were in the dock.