seems not one person in London knows this Jihadi John.
seems not one person in London knows this Jihadi John.
Are you serious?
1. There were multiple laws broken, the primary being that this was an extortion and murder. Extortion as demonstrated by the ransom demand, and murder because of the beheading.
2. Clutching at straws are you? In order to have had the recording legally distributed here are just 2 of several conditions that had to be met;
i) There must have been an express agreement by the parties, i.e. Foley must have said yes, please distribute the images of my beheading. Do you honestly think he would have agreed?
ii) In the absence of Foley's consent, his legal heirs, i.e. estate must agree. (Do you honestly think his mum wants the beheading circulating?)
3. You claim the "owners" distributed it and that it therefore makes it alright. You are aware that it is illegal to profit or otherwise benefit from illegal activity. The dissemination of propaganda is in effect a benefit to the murderers' political campaign. When someone walks into a cinema and records a film and then posts it online, it is considered a theft. In this case, the beheading was an illegal act unless you want to now argue that it was a consensual act. More specifically, the distributors of the recording are engaged in the distribution of property that is deemed contraband. It is akin to trading in stolen goods. The fact remains that Foley did not consent to his beheading nor the distribution of the recording, His right to privacy was violated. The onus to show consent is on the distributors of the recording.
There is no legal basis upon which the recording can be publicly disseminated. You are unable to provide any justification in law that allows it to do be distributed. The servers for companies like Liveleak and others are located in jurisdictions which have laws governing the distribution of illegally obtained materials.
Kindness is spaying and neutering one's companion animals.
Spanish Civil war, Brits went over to fight Facism, and last year the BBC treated them as hero's.
Today These young brave men from London are fighting for a noble cause, just like other volunteer warriors from times past.
They are fighting fascists.
Well done the new " Beatles "
You don't know what media law is in Syria/Iraq (and your concepts about media law pertaining to deceased parties in other countries is also very erroneous) , so basically, you're making up this pretty speech to dovetail with whatever point it is you're trying to make.
Better that you really try to stop banging this drum (but of course you won't)
^^ As some nonentity once said "your either with us or against us". If the POTUS announces a new diktat it immediately becomes Global Law. If not kowtowing you are labelled as terrorists and are fair game for a bombing or financial wreaking campaign.
No. It's pointing out that you have not provided any proof of your claim.
One more you have not answered satisfactorily is "Which specific law was broken?" Let me help you find your answer. In which jurisdiction do you base your claims on? Syria/Syrian law? Iraq/Iraqi law? And which specific law was broken? For example (only): Penal Code 187 (a) PC in California, USA.
"If you don't want to get beheaded stay the fuck in Oklahoma! I don't think they are beheading people in Oklahoma anyway" - George Carlin
I don't condone these people's actions.... but Christ Almighty you can't tell me this guy did not know he was in a dangerous business... he knew the risks... AND he probably got paid very well for those risks!
stay the fuck in Oklahoma....
This is a great message board.... For me to poop on!
i read today (sorry can't remember where) that the US was considering this guy's beheading to be an act of terrorism against the US....which clearly is a stretch.
is that how they're going to justify dropping bombs in syria?
Justify massacring people . When has the US/NATO ever justified their hammering of every virtual nail in the world.Originally Posted by raycarey
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)