Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    I am in Jail
    leemo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    07-10-2015 @ 02:27 PM
    Location
    pty
    Posts
    2,608

    UK: pedo Hafiz walks

    Islamic teacher who sexually abused girl, 11, as he taught her the Koran spared jail because his wife doesn't speak English

    Suleman Maknojioa, 40, squeezed girl's chest under her prayer scarf
    Attacks took place as he gave lessons in Arabic to girl and her brothers
    Father of six convicted of five counts of sexual activity with a child
    He was handed a suspended sentence after judge told his family rely on him


    An Islamic teacher who sexually abused a young girl as he taught her the Koran has been spared prison after a court was told he is on benefits and his wife speaks 'very little English'.

    Suleman Maknojioa, 40, repeatedly rubbed the 11-year-old’s leg and even reached underneath the long folds of her prayer headscarf to squeeze her chest whilst giving her and her two brothers private tuition in Arabic.

    Maknojioa was said to have 'favoured' the girl and believed the touching was 'appropriate' and given to reassure her.

    But the confused girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, found herself becoming frightened whenever lessons were due for fear of what the tutor would do to her.

    He was reported to police after the child’s mother overheard her two sons, aged 13 and seven, talking about the incidents in the kitchen.


    Read on: Islamic teacher who sexually abused girl, 11, spared jail because he's on benefits | Mail Online

    I always thought pedos belong in Parliament or jail, even in Britstan.

    But fair's fair, the world's changing so we should learn to change with it.

  2. #2
    Custom user Neverna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Behind a rhododendron bush
    Posts
    17,589
    Headline says: spared jail because his wife doesn't speak English

    url says: spared jail because he's on benefits

    Judge actually says:
    'There could be no greater recognition of trust than between a minister of religion and pupils whose care is entrusted to him by parents. You breached that trust deliberately and repeatedly. Consequently you have been removed from any employment you have known. You are no longer teaching, you are suffering ill-health and are due to undergo surgical intervention.
    'I bear in mind your own family circumstances. I accept you are a very good father to your six children, your wife speaks little English and administration falls upon you.
    'I bear in mind that social services conducted their own assessment and found that you do not pose a risk. You are now unemployed living on state benefits.
    'I have come to the conclusion that this repeated offending from a person in a position of trust merits a term of imprisonment that crosses the custodial threshold. But I’m satisfied that the sentence of imprisonment in this case for the reasons I have referred to may be suspended.'

    I say: I'm surprised a social services assessment found he does not pose a risk.
    signature

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    15,432
    well he certainly looks harmless enough



    picture of child molestor Suleman Maknoijoa from lancashire telegraph.

  4. #4
    Gohills flip-flops wearer
    withnallstoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 11:36 PM
    Location
    The Felcher Memorial Home.
    Posts
    14,273



    NO RISK ?




    The judge needs locking up.

  5. #5
    Molecular Mixup
    blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-06-2019 @ 01:29 AM
    Location
    54°N
    Posts
    11,353
    he's not a pedo , he cannot be as only whities can be paedophiles in the medias eyes - i just read the article he's not called that once - except in the readers comments , they must be racists.


  6. #6
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    15,432
    look sharp and do try and keep up at the back there withnall minor.

  7. #7
    Custom user Neverna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Behind a rhododendron bush
    Posts
    17,589
    Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
    he's not a pedo , he cannot be as only whities can be paedophiles in the medias eyes - i just read the article he's not called that once - except in the readers comments , they must be racists.
    Perhaps it's not a legal term.

    I can't see any mention of it in the Sexual Offences Act 2003: Sexual Offences Act 2003

  8. #8
    Thailand Expat
    charleyboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Online
    29-08-2019 @ 01:29 PM
    Location
    Cha-am.
    Posts
    3,697
    How the fook can them fookers be pedoes...They have brides at 9 Y.O!

  9. #9
    I am in Jail
    leemo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    07-10-2015 @ 02:27 PM
    Location
    pty
    Posts
    2,608
    Quote Originally Posted by charleyboy View Post
    How the fook can them fookers be pedoes...They have brides at 9 Y.O!
    You got it, not nine but close. Sharia sanctions marriage to a girl of any age, even a few days old, and her husband may use her body for sex short of vaginal penetration. Sodomy is fine as long he does not inflict permanent injury upon her, as this would make him liable to support her for life; the good news (for him) is that the injured girl would not count as one of his 4 legal wives.

    'Thighing' is an Islamic practice still followed today by Muslims, one can safely reckon also today in the 'civilised' world. It is the practice of masturbation between the legs of an infant, usually female.


    Source: http://www.islamic-fatwa.net

    Not my words, so please don't shoot the messenger, though some will anyway...

    Question 1809: "What is the opinion of scholars, knowing full well that the prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha - the mother of believers - may Allah be pleased with her ?"

    Answer: After studying the issue, the committee has answered as follows:

    As for the prophet, his thighing his fiancée Aisha when she was six years of age and not able to consummate the relationship was due to her small age. That is why the Prophet used to place his male member between her thighs and massage it, as the prophet had control of his male member not like other men.


    Ayatollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:

    "A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."

    “It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.” - Khomeini, "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990

    "Young boys or girls in full sexual effervescence are kept from getting married before they reach the legal age of majority. This is against the intention of divine laws. Why should the marriage of pubescent girls and boys be forbidden because they are still minors, when they are allowed to listen to the radio and to sexually arousing music?" - Ayatu Allah Al Khumaini's "Tahrir Al wasila" 12-241

    Notes: Most Muslims are generally unaware that music, singing and dancing are all illegal in Sharia, with the exception of music and songs that specifically praise Allah.

  10. #10
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    15,432


    A RELIGIOUS teacher who denies sexually touching a young girl told a court he never had ‘any bad intentions’.

    Suleman Maknojioa, 40, of Audley Range, Blackburn told a jury at Preston Crown Court he had patted the primary school pupil’s head, arm or shoulder because she was easily upset.

    The Indian-born teacher is accused of touching her legs and of putting his hand beneath her headscarf to squeeze her chest.

    He denies five counts of sexual touching.

    The married father-of-six, who has taught in mosques in London, Blackburn and in Darwen, said he had not touched her for sexual intent.


    He said he would only have touched her leg to move her away if she had knelt too close to him.

    Earlier his statement to police had been read out to the court.

    He said he had needed to console her at times.

    He said: “She always became quite nervous without me saying anything. She was aware she couldn't read the Koran very well.

    “She used to get embarrassed and cry so I would try to calm her.”

    When asked if he had ever touched her for sexual gratification he said: "Never, ever. It is a crime and an Islamic crime.”

    He denied ever placing his hand beneath her headscarf.

    Taking the stand, he said: “She is very emotional. If someone spoke harshly she started crying. I would feel bad if that happened.

    “Sometimes if she was doing well in the lesson I would say ‘good’ or ‘best in class’. I would pat her arm.”

    He added that he had also had to show her a position appropriate for women to pray in.

    He said: “I said to her, if she had her arms down low in front of her, that was how men prayed. For a woman, you must put your hands up in front of your chest.

    “Kneeling and placing your head on the floor is different for a woman too, and I may have touched her back.”

    He added: “Sometimes she would start crying when sitting next to her brothers so I would tell her to come away and sit down here next to me.”

    Proceeding

    Read more at

  11. #11
    Member
    harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:43 PM
    Posts
    60,461
    Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
    he's not a pedo , he cannot be as only whities can be paedophiles in the medias eyes - i just read the article he's not called that once - except in the readers comments , they must be racists.
    There was probably a queue of Catholics in front of and behind him, but the Daily Mail wouldn't want to point that out.

  12. #12
    Thailand Expat
    Lantern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 01:53 PM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,018
    Hopefully street justice will prevail.

    He needs a good hit.













































    With a Ford Cortina.

  13. #13
    I am in Jail
    leemo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    07-10-2015 @ 02:27 PM
    Location
    pty
    Posts
    2,608
    You mean a chon? I learned that today from my 2-yr-old outside the Sportsman.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    08-10-2015 @ 09:33 AM
    Posts
    249
    I hope for his kids sake the filthy animal does not move onto them.

  15. #15
    Custom user Neverna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Behind a rhododendron bush
    Posts
    17,589
    Well, it looks like fondling the breasts of an 11 year old girl isn't a jailable offence - according to Judge David Hale.


    A sex offender fearing jail faked his own suicide and fleeing to the other side of the world for 10 years – but today a judge told him the charge didn’t even carry a prison sentence.

    Jones, 57, who back in 2004 lived at Plas Gwernoer in Nantlle, admitted two charges of sexual activity with a child.

    He was placed on a three-year community order with supervision and a community sex offender group work programme.

    Jones must register with the police as a sex offender for five years and a five-year SOPO (Sexual Offences Prevention Order) was made.

    Judge Hale branded Jones “an extremely stupid and foolish man” for giving into temptation and touching the child as he did on two occasions.

    Mold Crown Court heard that Idwal Glyn Jones panicked after being charged with fondling the breasts of an 11-year-old girl in 2004.

    Despite everything he had done to try and get out of it, a judge told him that the guidelines did not suggest a prison sentence.

    Sex offender scared of jail faked his own death and fled to Thailand for 10 years - Wales Online

  16. #16
    ACT
    ACT is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Online
    01-04-2014 @ 05:22 PM
    Posts
    77
    Lucky for the kids he wasn't a Caucasian, local, Catholic priest.

  17. #17
    Molecular Mixup
    blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-06-2019 @ 01:29 AM
    Location
    54°N
    Posts
    11,353
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blue View Post
    he's not a pedo , he cannot be as only whities can be paedophiles in the medias eyes - i just read the article he's not called that once - except in the readers comments , they must be racists.
    There was probably a queue of Catholics in front of and behind him, but the Daily Mail wouldn't want to point that out.
    when I looked at that story yesterday , there was a link to another offender
    a 'white' woman -she was called a paedo by the daily mail reporters - several times -
    so why the double standard ? why wasn't he called one ?

    Female paedophile Loren Morris jailed for sex with an 8-year-old boy | Mail Online



    In dr bobs- now deleted post- he ridiculed the idea that you can tell an offender by looking at them -
    well looking at her I'm not sure I agree with that ....

    and she smokes too !
    guilty on first sight !!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •