The chappie who wrote that book called "Koran" did he not marry a 9 yr old about 500 years ago.
Whats good for the goose is good for the gander. ( god instructed Me to write that.) Bk1 verse 1
The chappie who wrote that book called "Koran" did he not marry a 9 yr old about 500 years ago.
Whats good for the goose is good for the gander. ( god instructed Me to write that.) Bk1 verse 1
About 1400 years ago, she was 6, he used her body except for vaginal penetration for sexual pleasures until re she reached the 'legal' age of 9, after which he consummated the marriage.
In her own words: "I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women." - Sahih Bukhari 7.72.715
Worst than this and other confirmed atrocities, is that liberals, progressives and assorted hate filled fruitcakes to this day proudly condone, defend, deny and mitigate the indefensible.
Mohammed married a 15 years older woman first, a successful business woman who proposed the marriage to him. He was married to her for 25 years until her death, and did not marry nor touch another woman for all this time. 4 of her 6 kids were fathered by Mohammed, all daughters.
The Jew was probably talking about Aisha, the 3rd wife. She might have been 6 when they married, other historians suggest an age up to 24 years. His only wife who was a virgin, and who didn't have children. If the marriage was consummated at the age of 9, she didn't suffer any damage. She had a keen intellect, served as a general, public speaker, author, the most influential figure of the empire for more than 50 years after his death.
Mohammed doesn't fit to the stereotypes of Muslims by the Jews, he didn't prefer virgins, nor sons, didn't chose most of his wifes himself, and didn't lock them up. The difference between fact and Jewish fiction might give you an idea of what caused the Shoa.
Boon Mee: 'Israel is the 51st State. De facto - but none the less, essentially part & parcel of the USA.'
BOING! - wrong again, Rainfall, but good to see you're still bouncing off walls.
Mo's first wife was Khadija bint Khuwaylid, 40, the wealthy widow of a successful businessman. He married her when he was 25.Mohammed married a 15 years older woman first, a successful business woman who proposed the marriage to him. He was married to her for 25 years until her death, and did not marry nor touch another woman for all this time. 4 of her 6 kids were fathered by Mohammed, all daughters.
Although he entered 'prophethood' during her lifetime, with her wealth and influence in support, Allah kindly refrained from divine revelations concerning the number of wives he would be allowed to enjoy. Here's a clue, Rainfall, and one that even you ought to be able to work with.
It was only after she died, when her wrath was no longer an issue, that Allah decided he could embark on hideous sexual escapades.
Not sure which Jew you refer to, but Aisha was Mo's second wife, not his third. Also not sure which 'historians' you googled to suggest she was 24 when they married, but the fact that she was still playing with dolls when she was led to enter Mo's home, should be another clue, even to you.The Jew was probably talking about Aisha, the 3rd wife. She might have been 6 when they married, other historians suggest an age up to 24 years. His only wife who was a virgin, and who didn't have children. If the marriage was consummated at the age of 9, she didn't suffer any damage. She had a keen intellect, served as a general, public speaker, author, the most influential figure of the empire for more than 50 years after his death.
There you go, ignorance at its proudest.If the marriage was consummated at the age of 9, she didn't suffer any damage.
Aisha: "I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women." - Sahih Bukhari 7.72.715
Facts are facts regardless, though yours are characteristically the very fiction that you project upon others.Mohammed doesn't fit to the stereotypes of Muslims by the Jews, he didn't prefer virgins, nor sons, didn't chose most of his wifes himself, and didn't lock them up. The difference between fact and Jewish fiction might give you an idea of what caused the Shoa.
Not only did Mo choose his own wives, but Allah sent him conveniently timed 'revelations' that allowed him to counter Arab law, culture and tradition to serve his carnal desires. Even to marrying his child bride, Aisha, against her father's wishes. And when he decided to marry his adopted son's wife, Allah dropped another conveniently timed revelation allowing him to do so, followed in quick succession by another prohibiting adoption, to prevent such vile conduct from entering tradition. Go figure, considering his adopted son was a slave given to him by his first wife as a wedding pressie.
After his hijra to Medina, where the majority Jews were PC enough to welcome the 'persecuted' Muslims, he established what is known as the Constitution of Medina. This was to ease friction and conflict between the major tribes in and around Medina, but went further by securing equal rights for Jews and Muslims only as long as the Jews remained supportive of the Muslims. He later fought and destroyed these tribes, for alleged violations, the most astute being that they rejected Allah.
When he entered Medina, all of the previous prophets were Jewish, and he tried to establish his own prophethood on the same lines to persuade them that his religion was very similar to their own.
He accepted their prophets, as Islam does to this day, though with the claim that they were all Muslim. But the twist is that Allah intended Islam to dominate the world from the creation of the universe, that the early 'Muslim' prophets He sent down all conveyed the wrong message, and this is why He sent Mo down as the 'last and final' prophet to set things right. Seems to me on this basis alone, Allah might fairly be described as less than perfect.
But regardless, the Jews of Medina rejected Mo's status as a prophet, though he made many concessions. He even made Jerusalem the Muslim qibla. Others include dietary laws, such as bleeding meat, since Jews are forbidden from eating blood, and an aversion to pigs, because Jewish law says pigs have cloven hoofs but do not chew the cud, which makes them a prohibited food. Mo had no problem with this, either, but all of his courting and concessions were in vain, which is why he turned on the Jews with a vengeance.
Now, compare these with your 'facts', and let's have a partially coherent response.
Whatever. I know the good Lord felt is was prudent to kill off all but one family of the Jews, because every single one of them was evil. Millions compared to one good man.
Has been pointed out that there were no child marriages under Saddam? Behold the sort of freedom brought to you by the USA.
Forced marriages at age 9, genetically mutilated as soon as the clitoris appears ?
Yes folks, this is Europe today right now thanks to multiculrialism but Dr. Bob will be along soon to explain what the benefits are.
The general populace of Mussies there should wrap themselves in pork and go around bumping into every imam they encounter.
Aren't you somewhat apologetic for reasons i posted ? - so sad but the world it full of deviants so i guess it's no surprise.Originally Posted by neemo
Lets clip 'em all eh ?
The Koran is the word of God, and he had no opinion on the marriages of Mohammed. Other fish to fry, and so it's not in the Koran but the Hadiths. What's in the Koran are the regulations on marriage, consenting adults (sexual maturity in medieval times), and a woman has the right to choose her spouse. The truth is out there for those who wish to see it, agenda-driven Islamophobes refuse it of course.
If Iraq actually installed marriages to child brides, it's got nothing to do with Islam, but everything with the American annexation of that country, and introduction of American values. First of all appaling hypocrisy.
Last edited by Rainfall; 23-03-2014 at 05:55 PM.
On the contrary, Allah had lots to say about Mo's marriages. He sent down revelations specifically to endorse Mo's marriage to Aisha when she was 6, his marriage to his daughter-in-law (son's wife) and several others, including to the wife of the man he had just minutes before beheaded in front of her. But stay clueless, Rainfall, otherwise you'd be dangerous.
More crap from the craphead.What's in the Koran are the regulations on marriage, consenting adults (sexual maturity in medieval times), and a woman has the right to choose her spouse. The truth is out there for those who wish to see it, agenda-driven Islamophobes refuse it of course.
Sharia, Islamic law, deals with every aspect of the life of a Muslim, including on which side to spit, which hand to wipe with after a dump, and how to drink a glass of water in order to imitate Mohamed, because let's face it he definitely knew how to drink water.
So when you talk of regulations on marriage, you must be talking Sharia. But Sharia is born from the Sunna, not the Koran.
Meanwhile, the Koran is the word of Allah Himself, as conveyed by Gabriel to Mohamed whose life it addresses. It is the perfect book, nothing missing or omitted and not a word or comma subject to change. That's according to Muslims, not me. No kidding, the text in the Koran you get online or from Amazon is identical in every way with the one dictated by Allah himself.
So Aisha was obviously lying when she says a goat ate parts of her Koran, which she had transcribed directly from the mouth of Mohamed. Erm, Aisha's words not mine, but don't repeat them outside a mosque after Friday prayer, because you might lose your head in the confusion.
And Uthman wasn't really destroying or changing anything when he gathered all the Korans in the Muslim empire and destroyed them in a massive bonfire after taking what he wanted from each in compiling the Koran that Muslims read today.
And as for the Koran that one of Mohamed's wives refused to hand over to be pulped by Uthman, not even a Caliph would have gotten away with murdering a Mo's ex. So he compiled his Koran, waited for her to die and then tortured her servants to find and destroy her copy...and nobody's the wiser, especially not Muslims and their apologists.
Sheer ignorance.If Iraq actually installed marriages to child brides, it's got nothing to do with Islam, but everything with the American annexation of that country, and introduction of American values. First of all appaling hypocrisy.
I think not, thread being of a muslim nation allowing pubescent girls into marriageOriginally Posted by neemo
by law ? - come on Neemo surely you do not approve of that.
Then again you don't seem to condemn clit clipping so... whatever.
I come to believe Dobby is a closet PC nutter who secretly supports feminists and The Guardian to campaign against FGM and forced marriage worldwide.
Beside being kiddie rapists and molesters, I see another pattern.....
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S. Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Beslan Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims
Nothing good comes out of 'em
Mow the rapist, child marrying terrorists down!
There is no closet about it, i'm there in the open against forced marriage, clit chopping, sharia law et all. i just don't like the muslim code of life - seems you do.Originally Posted by neemo
BTW I read the Daily Mail. - doh..., there are some nutjobs on this forum but thankfully not many.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)