Originally Posted by piwanoino, it seems that you cannot readOriginally Posted by piwanoi
we have agreed with your statement that jobs are disappearing, no-one has disputed that
if that was your idea of a debate, I feel sorry for you
Originally Posted by piwanoino, it seems that you cannot readOriginally Posted by piwanoi
we have agreed with your statement that jobs are disappearing, no-one has disputed that
if that was your idea of a debate, I feel sorry for you
It all went slowly down hill after the 60's. Thatcher and Reagan slowed it down but didn't turn it around. They spent money that they shouldn't have.
Now its game over. The west won't be able to afford socialism after the coming currency crisis. I cant wait.
I cant fucking wait...
that is good experience for them, teach them that just because they have a bit of paper saying they went to some redbrick establishment they do not automatically get some high flying jobOriginally Posted by wasabi
and they certainly cannot afford capitalismOriginally Posted by socal
I'd like to think he's just trolling, the truth is far more disturbing..
Maybe, but we both know it was a change from Labour to the Torys
Unemployment Rate - Last Ten Years | MacroTrends
Last edited by piwanoi; 19-01-2013 at 10:10 AM.
Maggie thatcher was a Tory and I suppose her Republican opposite Reagan could well have been thought of as one too, for sure they was'nt Socialists eh , BTW and thanks for confirming that technology causes more unemployment which is EXACTLY what I have writing all along ,you've just hung yourself with your own noose ,earlier you said technology creates jobs ,now you say there was more jobs back then when they had less technology and I find it rather strange when you say politics have nothing to do with unemployment but blame all the worlds problems on Socialism , FFS, get a grip
Last edited by piwanoi; 19-01-2013 at 11:11 AM.
Yeah gotta admit you are correct ,I mean lets have it right since China ditched Mao's Socialist dream world and adopted full blown capitalism in all but name, they have lurched from crisis to crisis , word is that they are seriously thinking of going back to the tried and tested successful past of good old Chairman Mao! and when we used to see them strung out on barbed wire with bullets holes in their backs in Germany they was alway,s fleeing from the evil capitalistic West to get into East Germanys socialist utopia and of course thats why the built the wall which was guarded 24 hours a day ,with the sole purpose of keeping those capitalistic wankers out of the East
Last edited by piwanoi; 19-01-2013 at 01:02 PM.
I have reported your post
Inconsequential ? according to you maybe ,I do not like being referred to as "Gutter road kill " my post#151 , in my view once some one resorts to personal name calling in a debate then they have lost simply cos they have nothing positive to say about the matter. why not report this post too? ,it would appear you are quite adroit at it
In the over and out quote I was referring to the other member as it was the first time as I can recall I had seen a post from him in the debate (Norton 236),and even if I was referring to myself and changed my mind and carried on with the debate , is that against forum rules too and another one for a report? you really are suspect under return fire ain't you
Last edited by piwanoi; 19-01-2013 at 02:24 PM.
Another thread dragged screaming and crying to the dog house in.. 3.. 2..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)