![]() |
|
Welcome to the TeakDoor.com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| |||||||
| US Domestic Issues Topics which focus on issues within the US or concern those who come from or live in the US. |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Lopburi Last Online: 18-06-2007 10:00 PM Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: In a frigid wasteland too close to the arctic circle
Posts: 307
| The one big thing the US has going for it is that there is enough money floating around in it to turn the problems around. Third world countries get screwed because their interest on their debt matches their GDP so it is impossible to keep up let alone pay the debt down. Canada was facing a deficit crisis about 15 years ago and through allot of painful fiscal restraint, things are back on track. The states can do the same, the problem is to find the will to do it. I wonder what the debt service costs are for the US debt as a portion of the current budget. I would not be surprised if the debt service cost is a significant portion of the current annual deficits. On the other hand allowing the currency to devalue helps at both ends of the scale. It will reduce the amount of the debt as a portion of GDP and it also will spur exports to mitigate the trade imbalance. The biggest negative issues are that this will lead to inflation, erosion of wealth and higher interest rates. I would guess we will see a moderately painful correction but I can't see it becoming a collapse. I would also guess you will see a reduction of the standard of living for most folks. I still think one of the primary issues with the US economy is the inequitable division of wealth. To much of the money is in the hands of a few for a 1st world country. |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) | |||
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 8,172
| Quote:
There was a correction in 1987, which was a 500 point drop, but the percentage was about 22% (?) The term "crash" is a misnomer. In 1929 there was a crash. And people jumpted out of windows because of Margin debt. Unemployment hit 25% Quote:
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. _____________ | |||
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) |
| spirit was irrepressible Last Online: Today 08:25 AM Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,163
| ^ ok ok now your being slightly pedantic - correction / recession / depression / dip / decline. all more or less parts of the same slippery slope innit! ok - perhaps the US may not crash but the dollar is certainly gonna drop ........a lot - average workers are gonna loose their job - investors are gonna loose money in short the USA will become a nonfavourabe place to put money into and many ppl are gonna hurt / feel the pain.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) | |
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 8,172
| Quote:
But don't use the term "crash" if it's not the appropriate term. There won't be a crash. | |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) |
| Because I said so. Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Ban Phe
Posts: 4,821
| Army Exceeds Recruiting Goal By Mark Noonan As I always say, consult not what people say, but what they do: WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Army said Friday it surpassed its recruiting goal for May, marking the 12th consecutive month of meeting or exceeding its target.With a booming economy, the only explanation for this must be continued patriotism and support for the overall War on Terrorism, including the liberation of Iraq element of it. Polls can say this, that and the other thing - but signing up when you know you're likely to be sent to a combat zone is a lot more substantial than answering a question over the phone. Anyone can say they are against the war - but these magnificent men and women are showing they support the war. As I've also said, a lot of people will be surprised at the results this November, but I won't be.
__________________ "England forever; the USA one day longer" To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| | |
| | #46 (permalink) | |
| Too drunk to fuck Last Online: Today 04:30 PM Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Fuckwitistan
Posts: 24,122
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #49 (permalink) | |
| Suspended Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,324
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #50 (permalink) | |
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 8,172
| Quote:
A correction has nothing to do with a recesion, depression,dip, or decline. A recession is not a depression. A depresion is not a recession. A dip is usually considered to be a correction, and dips/correction happen during high growth and favorble economic times. There won't be a crash. There may be more inflation; maybe not. There may be declining standard of living. Don't get me wrong. The U.S. is NOT in good shape economically. Not in good shape at all. Things have not been good in the U.S. since the late 1970s. | |
| | |
| | #55 (permalink) | ||
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 8,172
| Quote:
This is the field of economics. Ask for 3 opinions and you'll get six answers. | ||
| | |
| | #57 (permalink) | ||
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 8,172
| Quote:
He was pretty wrong on the U.S. dollar, recently. It's easy to look back in the past and try to explain why something happened economically, but when it comes to the future..... | ||
| | |
| | #58 (permalink) |
| Because I said so. Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Ban Phe
Posts: 4,821
| The answer to panic about America's debt: "The second mistake was pointed out, as best I recall from my high school researches, by Daniel Webster c. 1832. Then as now, there were vocal worries about foreigners owning too much of America. Webster pointed out that foreign investment meant, not that they had our stuff, but that we had their money. If push came to shove, if foreign governments tried to pressure the U.S. by threatening to withdraw their citizens' investments, we could keep it-refuse to pay back the debt. Their capital, after all, in the form of canals and the first railroads, was immovably located under our jurisidiction." http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/2...-v-daniel.html |
| | |
| | #59 (permalink) |
| Because I said so. Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Ban Phe
Posts: 4,821
| President Bush's Successful Deficit Reduction Yet another "read it and weep, liberals" piece: Aided by surging tax receipts, President Bush may make good on his pledge to cut the deficit in half in 2006 — three years early. Tax revenues are running $176 billion, or 12.9%, over last year, the Treasury Department said Monday. The Congressional Budget Office said receipts have risen faster over the first eight months of fiscal '06 than in any other such period over the past 25 years — except for last year's 15.5% jump. |
| | |