![]() |
| |||||||
| US Domestic Issues Topics which focus on issues within the US or concern those who come from or live in the US. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) | |||
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 15,439
| Quote:
There was a correction in 1987, which was a 500 point drop, but the percentage was about 22% (?) The term "crash" is a misnomer. In 1929 there was a crash. And people jumpted out of windows because of Margin debt. Unemployment hit 25% Quote:
__________________ Military men are dumb, stupid animals, to be used as pawns for foreign policy – Henry Kissinger (January-February 2003 edition of Eagle Newsletter) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | |||
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Suspended Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,040
| ^ I don't agree entirely. It's possible to turn things around rapidly. You can see how a fuckwit like GW Bush can be a liability for consumer confidence. Since we are consumers driven economies, public sentiment is unfortunately what drives us. And that's when public figures can have an impact. They hold the carrot stick. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Lopburi Last Online: 18-06-2007 11:00 PM Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: In a frigid wasteland too close to the arctic circle
Posts: 306
| The one big thing the US has going for it is that there is enough money floating around in it to turn the problems around. Third world countries get screwed because their interest on their debt matches their GDP so it is impossible to keep up let alone pay the debt down. Canada was facing a deficit crisis about 15 years ago and through allot of painful fiscal restraint, things are back on track. The states can do the same, the problem is to find the will to do it. I wonder what the debt service costs are for the US debt as a portion of the current budget. I would not be surprised if the debt service cost is a significant portion of the current annual deficits. On the other hand allowing the currency to devalue helps at both ends of the scale. It will reduce the amount of the debt as a portion of GDP and it also will spur exports to mitigate the trade imbalance. The biggest negative issues are that this will lead to inflation, erosion of wealth and higher interest rates. I would guess we will see a moderately painful correction but I can't see it becoming a collapse. I would also guess you will see a reduction of the standard of living for most folks. I still think one of the primary issues with the US economy is the inequitable division of wealth. To much of the money is in the hands of a few for a 1st world country. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Senior Member | ^ ok ok now your being slightly pedantic - correction / recession / depression / dip / decline. all more or less parts of the same slippery slope innit! ok - perhaps the US may not crash but the dollar is certainly gonna drop ........a lot - average workers are gonna loose their job - investors are gonna loose money in short the USA will become a nonfavourabe place to put money into and many ppl are gonna hurt / feel the pain. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 15,439
| Quote:
But don't use the term "crash" if it's not the appropriate term. There won't be a crash. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Because I said so. Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Pattaya
Posts: 4,919
| Army Exceeds Recruiting Goal By Mark Noonan As I always say, consult not what people say, but what they do: WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Army said Friday it surpassed its recruiting goal for May, marking the 12th consecutive month of meeting or exceeding its target.With a booming economy, the only explanation for this must be continued patriotism and support for the overall War on Terrorism, including the liberation of Iraq element of it. Polls can say this, that and the other thing - but signing up when you know you're likely to be sent to a combat zone is a lot more substantial than answering a question over the phone. Anyone can say they are against the war - but these magnificent men and women are showing they support the war. As I've also said, a lot of people will be surprised at the results this November, but I won't be.
__________________ "England forever; the USA one day longer" To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| ผู้เชี่ยวชาญเปล่า Last Online: Yesterday 10:21 PM Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Simian Islands
Posts: 30,382
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 15,439
| Quote:
A correction has nothing to do with a recesion, depression,dip, or decline. A recession is not a depression. A depresion is not a recession. A dip is usually considered to be a correction, and dips/correction happen during high growth and favorble economic times. There won't be a crash. There may be more inflation; maybe not. There may be declining standard of living. Don't get me wrong. The U.S. is NOT in good shape economically. Not in good shape at all. Things have not been good in the U.S. since the late 1970s. | |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | ||
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 15,439
| Quote:
This is the field of economics. Ask for 3 opinions and you'll get six answers. | ||
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Suspended Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,040
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 15,439
| ^ I see you're in a cut-and-past mood today. That's OK. They've been good recently. SK, This is short-term not long term. Tax reciepts fluctuate a lot. Budget makers do NOT view tax reciepts in the mid and long term. You have got to look at the big picture. Have you seen the independent projections for the deficit in the year 2010? As for liberals, liberals do not want increased deficits. The few liberals left in government want the opposite. In 1990, the U.S. government - bipartisan - adopted the "pay as you go" policy. This worked from 1990 to 2001. George W. Bush agandoned that, obviously. |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) | |
| Because I said so. Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Pattaya
Posts: 4,919
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests) | |
| Panda |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |