The Thailand expat forum for Travel, Lifestyle and Fun.

RPETER65 · 14-11-2008, 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPETER65

I guess I missed all the news reports of the suicide bombings done by Christian Fundamentalists.

I guess there were cartoons or something on when Timothy McVeigh was in the news then. Or that bloke that killed the clinic workers. Or when your President declared a war of 'good Vs. evil'. Or when your President ordered the invasion of another country because God Bless America right, He wanted the US to do it.

You guys are dillusional if you consider Timothy McVeigh to be a Christian fundamentalist, McVeigh and his co-conspirators are far from Conservative Christians, same with that bloke that killed the clinic workers. You are really grasping at straws. What I am talking about here are the mainstream Conservative Christians not a couple of wacked out crazies.

Jet Gorgon · 12-11-2008, 03:16 PM

^ I would say the same about libbie Kool-Aid drinkers.

panama hat · 12-11-2008, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPETER65

you obviosly have 0 knowledge of what the mainstream Christian conservitive is all about

I do have some knowledge and am not really that interested in their rantings, do you have in-depth knowledge? If that's your game then go for it and believe their clap-trap.
Move back in time and close the windows and then your eyes, teach creationism and ignore science . . . if it makes you a better person

RPETER65 · 13-11-2008, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panama hat

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPETER65

you obviosly have 0 knowledge of what the mainstream Christian conservitive is all about

I do have some knowledge and am not really that interested in their rantings, do you have in-depth knowledge? If that's your game then go for it and believe their clap-trap.
Move back in time and close the windows and then your eyes, teach creationism and ignore science . . . if it makes you a better person

Knowledge

what you have my freind is ignorance.

raycarey · 12-11-2008, 05:16 PM

c'mon PH, it's not called 'creationism' anymore, it's been re-branded as 'intelligent design'.

panama hat · 12-11-2008, 07:16 PM

Damnation . . . may hellfire be stoked and lightning bolts cascade over the horizon to deal the death-knell to all unbelievers.

Intelligent design . . . was that before or after RPETER65 started attending book-burning sessions?

Jet Gorgon · 13-11-2008, 05:34 AM

^ They remain staunch lefties.
God banished our convict ancestors from the third of Betelgeus' five planets to the new penal colony now known as earth. She told me so.

foreigner · 13-11-2008, 06:18 AM

>0 knowledge of what the mainstream Christian conservitive<

the radical christians are not conservative .. they are religious radical nut cases.

in their best Rovian fashion the religious radicals use words to describe them selves that are totally inappropriate.

terrorist acts: bombing abortion clinics. Sarah refused to call bombing abortion clinics terrorism.
christians are vehement supports of the zionist terrorism on palestinians.
(zion is integral to rapture)

nut cases that want their mystical beliefs to be the policy of america.
the environment or women's health care or foreign policy .. they want goofy mystical beliefs to determine policy

a believer in rapture with a finger on the bomb is a scary thing.

IMHO, public officials need to take a test;
1. did 2 kangaroos hop (.. or 2 buffalo or 2 S. American sloths) to Mess-o-potamia 4000 years ago?
2. was the grand canyon (at 8000') eroded in a short period of time by Noah's flood?
3. did man and dinosaurs co-exist .. = was the flintsones movie a documentary.

give a stupid answer to those questions & you cannot hold public office.

RPETER65 · 13-11-2008, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foreigner

>0 knowledge of what the mainstream Christian conservitive<

the radical christians are not conservative .. they are religious radical nut cases.

in their best Rovian fashion the religious radicals use words to describe them selves that are totally inappropriate.

terrorist acts: bombing abortion clinics. Sarah refused to call bombing abortion clinics terrorism.
christians are vehement supports of the zionist terrorism on palestinians.
(zion is integral to rapture)

nut cases that want their mystical beliefs to be the policy of america.
the environment or women's health care or foreign policy .. they want goofy mystical beliefs to determine policy

a believer in rapture with a finger on the bomb is a scary thing.

IMHO, public officials need to take a test;
1. did 2 kangaroos hop (.. or 2 buffalo or 2 S. American sloths) to Mess-o-potamia 4000 years ago?
2. was the grand canyon (at 8000') eroded in a short period of time by Noah's flood?
3. did man and dinosaurs co-exist .. = was the flintsones movie a documentary.

give a stupid answer to those questions & you cannot hold public office.

You can find radicals in any sect of society, most conservative christians are not nearly as radical as you and the rest of the libtards in this forum, most are peace loving, conservative people. The problem is there is such a strong movement against them.
Is murdering unborn babies less disgusting than bombing the people who are doing the murdering, not that I personally advocate either one.

Butterfly · 13-11-2008, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPETER65

who pulled your chain? I guess I missed all the news reports of the suicide bombings done by Christian Fundamentalists.

yeah, you have missing quite a few things

Jet Gorgon · 13-11-2008, 07:43 AM

Radical anything can be explosive, but then how do you determine what is radical? Are the Amish or Hutterites radical? They are fundamentalists, but I would hardly call them radical in the sense that they would never hurt or harm anyone intentionally. Mormons are peace-loving, but still have the stigma of polygamy about them, especially as some of their offshoots still practise it. Better than Iranians who have laws that men can marry nine-year-old girls, tho.

panama hat · 13-11-2008, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Knowledge what you have my freind is ignorance.

I guess if indoctrination and hiding behind rocks is knowledge then you have the upper hand . . .
And I am neither your freind (sic) nor your friend . . . we wouldn't have too much to talk about, would we . . .

Jet Gorgon · 13-11-2008, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panama hat

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Knowledge what you have my freind is ignorance.

I guess if indoctrination and hiding behind rocks is knowledge then you have the upper hand . . .
And I am neither your freind (sic) nor your friend . . . we wouldn't have too much to talk about, would we . . .

^ How do you quanitfy (sic) that, hatter? Christians are indoctrinated and hide behind rocks? Or only those fundamentalist ones, like Reverend Wright? You counting radical Muslims and Jews, too? How about radical atheists and communists?

panama hat · 13-11-2008, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

How do you quanitfy (sic) that, hatter?

Please explain the spelling and the parentheses;

Jet Gorgon · 13-11-2008, 10:56 AM

^ A word quoted from the title of one of your threads in the Lounge. *sic* is usually added in parens. I take it you do understand what *sic* means, hatter. The silence from your side after all this time (as I add this extra info for you) indicates you must be doing an ignore to this post or maybe trying to resurrect your business?

panama hat · 13-11-2008, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

^ A word quoted from the title of one of your threads in the Lounge. *sic* is usually added in parens. I take it you do understand what *sic* means, hatter. The silence from your side after all this time (as I add this extra info for you) indicates you must be doing an ignore to this post or maybe trying to resurrect your business?

Nothing to resurrect, it's doing ok. Not brilliant yet, just ok.

On the contrary, I was wondering why you had misspelled a word and then used (sic) afterwards. A simple question, not meant to disparage you or what you wrote, just trying to figure out what you meant to imply.

I'm still not clear, but if you'd care to explain I'd be happy to answer your questions.

ChiangMai noon · 13-11-2008, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panama hat

Please explain the spelling and the parentheses;

childish and pedantic one upmanship i reckon.

Jet Gorgon · 13-11-2008, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon

Quote:

Originally Posted by panama hat

Please explain the spelling and the parentheses;

childish and pedantic one upmanship i reckon.

Ah, do check the origins and facts, CMN, before commenting, please.

foreigner · 13-11-2008, 11:04 AM

>murdering unborn babies<

like it or not that is a religious position, giving the status of life to something that is attached to & relies on the mother for life..

no point in arguing the zygote vs fetus vs living entity..
this is an issue of the evangelicals .. similar to virgin birth, return from the dead, kangaroos hopping over the Himalayas (or did they swim the Indian ocean) .. or the the grand canyon idiocy. .

if the question of life was the only point of idiocy evangelicals support it would be different ..
face it: evangelicals do not let facts or science or logic or common sense come in the way of their goofy mystical beliefs

I care not about your stupid myths .. just do not try to deny my daughters health care or education.
When your mystical beliefs interfere with my family's welfare then your goofiness becomes the enemy of my family .. & must be exposed & ridiculed .. & denied all status in society.

keep your goofy beliefs in your church, bedroom or closet .. & outa my f'n life.

evangelicals tend to be angry people that want to dominate those that do not submit to their fantasies.
how many smiling happy people were at sarah's events? .. at the republican convention?

"So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence." - Bertrand Russell.

RPETER65 · 13-11-2008, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foreigner

>murdering unborn babies<

like it or not that is a religious position, giving the status of life to something that is attached to & relies on the mother for life..

no point in arguing the zygote vs fetus vs living entity..
this is an issue of the evangelicals .. similar to virgin birth, return from the dead, kangaroos hopping over the Himalayas (or did they swim the Indian ocean) .. or the the grand canyon idiocy. .

if the question of life was the only point of idiocy evangelicals support it would be different ..
face it: evangelicals do not let facts or science or logic or common sense come in the way of their goofy mystical beliefs

I care not about your stupid myths .. just do not try to deny my daughters health care or education.
When your mystical beliefs interfere with my family's welfare then your goofiness becomes the enemy of my family .. & must be exposed & ridiculed .. & denied all status in society.

keep your goofy beliefs in your church, bedroom or closet .. & outa my f'n life.

evangelicals tend to be angry people that want to dominate those that do not submit to their fantasies.
how many smiling happy people were at sarah's events? .. at the republican convention?

"So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence." - Bertrand Russell.

Well arn't we special, you non beleivers are trying your damdest to get any thing that vaguely resmbles Christianity out of the class rooms, and you talk about not denying your daughters rights to edducation, a little one sided are we. I have yet to see where Christians are trying to deny the teaching of the theory of evolution, and you notice I say theory as I don't think you can find a sientist who will absolutely say they can prove the evolution theory. Equal time, most students are able to decern the truth for themselves. What you really want is to make sure they are taught to be bigots like yourself.

Just goes to show how uninformed you are, when you state that evangelicals in general are angry, most could care less about dominating you or any one else, stop the attempts at doing away with there beleifs and you and evangelicals will happly coexist, just as Israel and the rest of the Arab world could coexist if the Arabs dropped the idea of destroying Israel.

You sound very bitter toward Christians, have they somehow caused you personally to suffer, or are you just a biggot, who wants to deny a large sector of society there rightfull place in this world.

13-11-2008, 06:18 AM	#8 (permalink)
foreigner Nakhon Ratchasima Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 240	>0 knowledge of what the mainstream Christian conservitive< the radical christians are not conservative .. they are religious radical nut cases. in their best Rovian fashion the religious radicals use words to describe them selves that are totally inappropriate. terrorist acts: bombing abortion clinics. Sarah refused to call bombing abortion clinics terrorism. christians are vehement supports of the zionist terrorism on palestinians. (zion is integral to rapture) nut cases that want their mystical beliefs to be the policy of america. the environment or women's health care or foreign policy .. they want goofy mystical beliefs to determine policy a believer in rapture with a finger on the bomb is a scary thing. IMHO, public officials need to take a test; 1. did 2 kangaroos hop (.. or 2 buffalo or 2 S. American sloths) to Mess-o-potamia 4000 years ago? 2. was the grand canyon (at 8000') eroded in a short period of time by Noah's flood? 3. did man and dinosaurs co-exist .. = was the flintsones movie a documentary. give a stupid answer to those questions & you cannot hold public office. __________________ You can fake an orgasism but you can't fake laughter ~ Bob Dylan I've heard it said that they can now make fuel from horse manure.... Now, I don't know if your car will be able to get 10 km per liter, but it's sure gonna put a stop to siphoning.

13-11-2008, 10:56 AM	#15 (permalink)
Jet Gorgon Jihad Barbie Last Online: Today 04:50 AM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Near Libbies Posts: 12,470	^ A word quoted from the title of one of your threads in the Lounge. sic is usually added in parens. I take it you do understand what sic means, hatter. The silence from your side after all this time (as I add this extra info for you) indicates you must be doing an ignore to this post or maybe trying to resurrect your business? Last edited by Jet Gorgon : 13-11-2008 at 01:18 PM.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-11-2008, 03:16 PM	#2 (permalink)
Jet Gorgon Jihad Barbie Last Online: Today 04:50 AM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Near Libbies Posts: 12,470	^ I would say the same about libbie Kool-Aid drinkers.

12-11-2008, 05:16 PM	#5 (permalink)
raycarey ........ Last Online: Today 02:36 PM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: deleting posts in issues Posts: 6,674	c'mon PH, it's not called 'creationism' anymore, it's been re-branded as 'intelligent design'.

12-11-2008, 07:16 PM	#6 (permalink)
panama hat Selamat Datang Last Online: Today 03:38 PM Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: South of the border now - thank God! Posts: 7,938	Damnation . . . may hellfire be stoked and lightning bolts cascade over the horizon to deal the death-knell to all unbelievers. Intelligent design . . . was that before or after RPETER65 started attending book-burning sessions?

13-11-2008, 05:34 AM	#7 (permalink)
Jet Gorgon Jihad Barbie Last Online: Today 04:50 AM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Near Libbies Posts: 12,470	^ They remain staunch lefties. God banished our convict ancestors from the third of Betelgeus' five planets to the new penal colony now known as earth. She told me so.

13-11-2008, 07:43 AM	#11 (permalink)
Jet Gorgon Jihad Barbie Last Online: Today 04:50 AM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Near Libbies Posts: 12,470	Radical anything can be explosive, but then how do you determine what is radical? Are the Amish or Hutterites radical? They are fundamentalists, but I would hardly call them radical in the sense that they would never hurt or harm anyone intentionally. Mormons are peace-loving, but still have the stigma of polygamy about them, especially as some of their offshoots still practise it. Better than Iranians who have laws that men can marry nine-year-old girls, tho.

13-11-2008, 11:04 AM	#19 (permalink)
foreigner Nakhon Ratchasima Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 240	>murdering unborn babies< like it or not that is a religious position, giving the status of life to something that is attached to & relies on the mother for life.. no point in arguing the zygote vs fetus vs living entity.. this is an issue of the evangelicals .. similar to virgin birth, return from the dead, kangaroos hopping over the Himalayas (or did they swim the Indian ocean) .. or the the grand canyon idiocy. . if the question of life was the only point of idiocy evangelicals support it would be different .. face it: evangelicals do not let facts or science or logic or common sense come in the way of their goofy mystical beliefs I care not about your stupid myths .. just do not try to deny my daughters health care or education. When your mystical beliefs interfere with my family's welfare then your goofiness becomes the enemy of my family .. & must be exposed & ridiculed .. & denied all status in society. keep your goofy beliefs in your church, bedroom or closet .. & outa my f'n life. evangelicals tend to be angry people that want to dominate those that do not submit to their fantasies. how many smiling happy people were at sarah's events? .. at the republican convention? "So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence." - Bertrand Russell.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)