Thread: Sarah Palin

Originally Posted by Texpat

The demos always try to appeal to the masses. Like equal opportunity.

And that's a bad thing??? Jesus, Texpat, that is pathetic, even for you

Originally Posted by spiff

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

The preponderance of the people I see here challenging you seem to be at least in part still on the fence without partisanship either way at this point, me included,...

Let's see: Top posters "challenging" raycarey in this thread -

Boon Mee, 55 posts

Jet Gorgon, 51

Britmaveric, 43

Drivingforce, 39

Bugs, 39

Texpat, 30

Mr.Earl, 29

AccidentalAjarn, 27

Carnwadrik, 24

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

In their zeal to denigrate the opponent they loose sight of logic and ethics.

Can you spell "irony"?

excuse me?? not all of my posts even pertain to rc nor am I denigrating him in any of them, don't include me in your ignorant generalizations without having your facts straight bucko!...
anyway i'm only 4th in line i'll have to step up my game..

Originally Posted by raycarey

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

Palin was just nominated ray

she was selected nearly a month ago.....i know she's not all that bright, but i hope she knows how to use a photocopier. how's this....she doesn't have to make 2 sided copies....one sided will suffice.

A month ago?? by who's calender??

And that still isn't 18 months like every one of the other candidates had to do so, I doubt very seriously she has either her tax documents or a copier in her pocket and she's been at full throttle since she got nominated..get real ray.. and what about the Hillary delay when it was her turn? she knew well in advance that she was going to be running and she still resisted until the bitter end..

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

Originally Posted by raycarey

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

Palin was just nominated ray

she was selected nearly a month ago.....i know she's not all that bright, but i hope she knows how to use a photocopier. how's this....she doesn't have to make 2 sided copies....one sided will suffice.

A month ago?? by who's calender??

And that still isn't 18 months like every one of the other candidates had to do so, I doubt very seriously she has either her tax documents or a copier in her pocket and she's been at full throttle since she got nominated..get real ray.. and what about the Hillary delay when it was her turn? she knew well in advance that she was going to be running and she still resisted until the bitter end..

19 days ago she was selected...so like i posted, nearly a month. and it's not like she's been busy with interviews.

and christ almighty, how long does it take to photocopy a tax return?
but hey, it's cool with me....the longer she takes, the more likely the corporate media will smell blood. in addition to headlines stating that she refuses to cooperate with investigators in her abuse of power scandal, there will also be headlines pointing out that she also refuses to release her tax returns.

and why do you keep bringing up hillary?
this thread is about sarah 'stonewall' palin.

Originally Posted by raycarey

and why do you keep bringing up hillary?

Obfuscation?

Originally Posted by panama hat

Originally Posted by Texpat

The demos always try to appeal to the masses. Like equal opportunity.

And that's a bad thing??? Jesus, Texpat, that is pathetic, even for you

So are we friends now? SMOOOOCH

My point is that they do what's popular, not what's right.

It's an age old conundrum of this:

Do you act in the interest of your constituency?
or
Do you act on behalf of your constituency?

Are you voted in to legislate their wish? Or are you there to legislate what's best for them?

It's a great debate -- Google the Carl Albert Center....

Originally Posted by raycarey

19 days ago she was selected...so like i posted, nearly a month. and it's not like she's been busy with interviews.

I see the rc calender of half months how convenient, my calender has mostly 30 days minimum on it which means 19 days is a lot closer to 2 weeks than it is a month..must be a strong dose of that new liberal math they are teaching in the schools lately

Originally Posted by raycarey

and why do you keep bringing up hillary? this thread is about sarah 'stonewall' palin.

because she's your counter pit bull and the one the dems would most like to hold up as the gold standard for a female candidate.. apples for apples is all.. and quite frankly I do too, I don't even consider Biden in this because he's just a token given where he placed in the larger picture..

more importantly though, why do you keep conveniently dodging the questions? you're always on about Jet dodging them but your every bit as dodgy and even more so when it suits you..

Originally Posted by raycarey

and christ almighty, how long does it take to photocopy a tax return?

I don't know, except the obvious I've already stated.. like I said likely it's more about priorities and that just isn't a priority to anyone except those of your ilk..

Originally Posted by panama hat

Obfuscation?

in rc's case i'm forced to agree, though that is not it's intended strategy... seems it's working quite well..

lightweight is the word to describe this unqualified stooge

Can you imagine is McCain gets elected with this wannabee and dies in office. What do you have? A bag of air, pair of tits and DOW down 2000 and the world in a shiter

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

because she's your counter pit bull

huh? my what? what are you on about?

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

why do you keep conveniently dodging the questions

what question? the off topic one about hillary's tax returns? as far as i know she released them months ago.....whenever it was, it was certainly with more than 50 odd days remaining before the election. you think she should have released them sooner? OK, great.
but like i said, it's all good....i look forward to the headlines.
however, who wants to wager that she dumps them on a friday night after the network news programs have aired?

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

I don't know

you don't know how long it takes to photocopy a tax return?
how about you take a guess, and i'll tell you if you're close.

Originally Posted by jim1176

A bag of air, pair of tits and DOW down 2000 and the world in a shiter

that's no way to speak about obamas wife.. really.... she's more than that...

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

Originally Posted by jim1176

A bag of air, pair of tits and DOW down 2000 and the world in a shiter

that's no way to speak about obamas wife.. really.... she's more than that...

how witty, how clever.

555555

Originally Posted by raycarey

huh? my what? what are you on about? are you drunk again?

there ya go again rc, feeling pinned in and coming out swinging at air, you really must get over projecting your habits onto others you don't even know..

Originally Posted by raycarey

what question? the off topic one about hillary's tax returns?

who's drinking again? convenient memory so I'll repeat in the interest of your apparently increasing drunken stupor. how long was it before, and how many times was hillary (put her name in there again so the dementia wouldn't prevent you from remembering who we were talking about) asked before she produced her tax records and she had months to prepare before entering the race knowing it was going to be an issue, unlike palin who just found out 19 days ago..

Originally Posted by raycarey

you don't know how long it takes to photocopy a tax return?

no it's a fair answer and neither do you..you have no idea what it involves for her.. so don't be presumptuous ass..

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

feeling pinned in

by the likes of you?
hardly.
and it's become pretty clear that you're well aware of that.
but why don't you explain what you meant by "she's your counter pitbull" because i have no idea what you're on about.
at all.

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

no it's a fair answer and neither do you..you have no idea what it involves for her

it's a fair answer, eh?
laughable.

if she's unable to figure out how the scary copy machine works, she could drop by kinkos----i think they could figure it out for her.

i would normally say she could ask mccain, but the old man still hasn't figured out 'the computer'.

but let's get back on topic.......when is 'stonewall' sarah going to have a press conference?

you know, stand at a podium and answer questions on a wide array of topics.

after her deer in the headlights moment last week, i'm not holding my breath.

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

how long was it before, and how many times was hillary asked before she produced her tax records and she had months to prepare before entering the race knowing it was going to be an issue

i have no idea. you seem to think it took too long. great.
if you're so desperate for my reply, put up the figures, and i'll happily give you my opinion.
but don't expect me to do the work for you...that's not how it works young man.

Originally Posted by Texpat

My point is that they do what's popular, not what's right.

And you are saying that the two cannot coincide? I'm really not understanding you. Both parties are populist and proclaim what their followers want to hear, are you disputing that?

Originally Posted by Texpat

Who gives a damn about candidate wives or VPs?

If you do, you're lame.

If you care on iota, you're an ill-informed twat.

See ya Ray.

coming from the poster who started the michelle obama thread.

Originally Posted by raycarey

and it's become pretty clear that you're well aware of that.

clearly, that's why your posts are getting more and more aggressive and nonsensical with every response..

Originally Posted by raycarey

i have no idea.

and yet you challenge my understanding of why palin hasn't produced her taxes?? pathetic double standard ray as at least my question already has an answer, just not from you..

Hillary is your "pit bull with lipstick" you bone head...

Originally Posted by panama hat

proclaim what their followers want to hear,

I know your question is aimed at Tex but I would contend that some actually promise what they can deliver for the most part, not just what the constituency wants to hear..

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

George Washington: "It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible."

1. John Adams: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."
2. Thomas Jefferson: "Religion, as well as reason, confirms the soundness of those principles on which our government has been founded and its rights asserted."
3. Abraham Lincoln: "...I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
4. Franklin D. Roosevelt: "As Americans, we go forward, in the service of our country, by the will of God."
5. John F. Kennedy: "For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago. The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God."

thanks to RWN

You forgot about Moses and Co. :

Moses: said unto the LORD, O my LORD, I am not eloquent, neither heretofore, nor since thou hast spoken unto thy servant: but I am slow of speech, and of a slow tongue.

Abraham: said, My son, God will provide himself with the sheep for a burnt-offering. And they went both of them together.


...are we finish with Bible class now



thanks to HtG

After that illuminating post by Herman . . .

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

I know your question is aimed at Tex but I would contend that some actually promise what they can deliver for the most part, not just what the constituency wants to hear..

Of course, and that is not limited to one party.

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

Originally Posted by jim1176

A bag of air, pair of tits and DOW down 2000 and the world in a shiter

that's no way to speak about obamas wife.. really.... she's more than that...

i suppose

whoever has the bigger tits is most qualified

Originally Posted by panama hat

After that illuminating post by Herman . . .

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

I know your question is aimed at Tex but I would contend that some actually promise what they can deliver for the most part, not just what the constituency wants to hear..

Of course, and that is not limited to one party.

no.... but ultimately it is that perception that is supposed to be the final determining factor of who is elected not just because they say what you want to hear or because they are your party..as is my impression of what Obama is doing right now..

Originally Posted by panama hat

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

Saturday Night Live - Palin / Hillary Open - Video - NBC.com

'Boner-Shrinker' . . .


Good stuff, I'd give you a green but you redded me . . .

Same here...he reded me too.
Guess I got to beat on some muslims in order to be loved again.

Originally Posted by jim1176

Originally Posted by DrivingForce

Originally Posted by jim1176

A bag of air, pair of tits and DOW down 2000 and the world in a shiter

that's no way to speak about obamas wife.. really.... she's more than that...

i suppose

whoever has the bigger tits is most qualified

i guess that qualifies palin then.... i'll go with that...

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Todd Palin is tough as nails.

The husband of Gov. Sarah Palin, or First Dude, as Alaskans have come to call him, survived a high-speed crash on Friday in which he broke his arm and had to be towed across the Chena River finish line in Fairbanks on Saturday after his snowmachine died, but he still finished the world’s longest, toughest snowmachine race in fourth place.

He's won the 2000 mile Iron Dog race 4 times, impressive by jeebus!
Let the Chicagoreans chew on those facts a while.

I thought he was to be taking care of their kids, baby's and unborn.

I wished I had parents like that.....then I could have started smoking pot, drinking and humping 17 year old girls at the age of six. Damn it !*'!