![]() |
|
Welcome to the TeakDoor.com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| |||||||
| US Domestic Issues Topics which focus on issues within the US or concern those who come from or live in the US. |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Elite Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: In a rather cold and dark place
Posts: 10,392
| GM going bust? Quote:
Bet they are regretting not developing economical cars now. | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Ich Bin Ein Auslander Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,312
| I doubt they'll go bust. They are in the poo though and have been for some time. I think they've finally clicked that building what people want rather than what you think they want is a better business focus. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Watching the Wheels Last Online: Yesterday 08:13 PM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: east of Pattaya
Posts: 8,301
| A few years back they divested a large parts manufacturing operation to a gullible public- Delphi I think that was called. That went bust. Now they are talking about closing down hummer, and no doubt a few more auto plants will need to go. They won't go bust, but they are going to need to slim down condiderably, maybe sell off some more brands. The management of GM got it horribly wrong with their continued focus on SUV's & big cars. More pain for the rust belt.
__________________ To err is human. To blame someone else is politics. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Last Online: Yesterday 10:19 PM Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Klong Samwa
Posts: 5,171
| In today's global marketplace there is only room for 3 major players. One in the US, one in the Pacific rim and one in Europe. GM may not be the one US based company |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Limp member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pleasantville
Posts: 4,543
| GM has survived or years on the back of its finance division, now as sales have tailed off even that hasn't generated enough cash to beak even. Fukcem,the writing was on the wall years ago for the barges they build but they kept on building them anyway. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| ฝรั่งพูดมาก Last Online: Today 12:17 AM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,486
| Hello. It's what people wanted. I'm amused by the notion that people were only buying what was available -- because that's all that was available. When gas is $2 a gallon, gimme a barge over a fcuking beer can anyday. The dynamic has shifted, so too will US automakers. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Limp member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pleasantville
Posts: 4,543
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| ฝรั่งพูดมาก Last Online: Today 12:17 AM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,486
| Who predicted the price of gas would double in those three years? Not many. And if gas were back to $2, Americans would want bigger cars. The preference is not for smaller, economical cars. The economic reality dictates it. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Ich Bin Ein Auslander Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,312
| All fair and valid points Tex. But the fact remains that most other car manufacturers correctly identified the market decades ago. And it's not as though high oil/gas prices are without precedent either - the oil crisis of the 70's srings to mind, and pretty much the exact same thing happened then as now.
__________________ ... allegedly |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) | |
| ฝรั่งพูดมาก Last Online: Today 12:17 AM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,486
| Quote:
It's not like Toyota forecast the spike in oil. That's what they make, little beer cans with wheels. GM makes what Americans want. Toyota is what America is forced to settle for. | |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| Ich Bin Ein Auslander Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,312
| Quote:
So there was clearly a demand well in advance of any external economic conditions. Pining all GM's woes to the door of a sudden and sharp rise in fuel prices is like correctly identifying a symptom but misdiagnosing the disease. | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Limp member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pleasantville
Posts: 4,543
| Wrong Tex, its what Americans wanted yesterday. Paint it anyway you want,its just incompetent business planning. You didn't need a crystal ball to see that rising consumption and static out put are going to result in a price blowout down the track at sometime in the near future. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) | ||
| Elite Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: In a rather cold and dark place
Posts: 10,392
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| ฝรั่งพูดมาก Last Online: Today 12:17 AM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,486
| All things being equal, Americans prefer large cars. A steep increase in gas price is forcing them to buy small cars. Following the 70s oil crisis, Americans went right back to the boats. They will again if oil ever goes down. Toyota makes small cars, (and better cars IMO) and therefore sells more than GM. I'm not arguing that point. My issue is with the notion that the manufacturer drives demand. I don't believe it. |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) | |
| Watching the Wheels Last Online: Yesterday 08:13 PM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: east of Pattaya
Posts: 8,301
| Quote:
![]() There is absolutely no excuse that GM, until recently the worlds largest auto maker, failed to develop it's competency in the small and medium sized car market, even whilst riding the hog on the SUV boom. No excuse whatsoever- they could see how the likes of Toyota and Honda were increasing their market share, and the inferiority of their own competing products. Jeez, even the biggest redneck seller is still the Ford F100. You predictably fall into line to defend all things Amerkin tex, whatever the facts on the ground. This ain't about Amerka- it's about business, specifically how a giant conglomerate like GM can stuff it up, and badly. Ironically, where GM is performing best is in it's international operations anyway, like Isuzu- where it is really bleeding is in the giant US domestic market. The responsibility lies with it's senior management- not the consumer, not oil prices, not the UAW. I think the modern US system of rewarding corporate Executives generously based on quarterly earnings performance, and the short term focus this encourages, needs a major overhaul. We could all learn from the Japs when it comes to intelligent business governance, with a longer term strategic focus, and executive remuneration and employment policies geared towards this. Last edited by sabang : 03-07-2008 at 12:15 PM. | |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) | ||||||
| Elite Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: In a rather cold and dark place
Posts: 10,392
| And some more Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ To Momo8 Quote:
Quote:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | ||||||
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) | |
| Limp member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pleasantville
Posts: 4,543
| Quote:
Ipod, good example, consumers were quite happy wth their CD players, then IPOD came along resulting in a demand for compact music devices. But I'm not a marketing guy, so maye I'm spouting BS. | |
| | |