![]() |
|
Welcome to the TeakDoor.com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| |||||||
| US Domestic Issues Topics which focus on issues within the US or concern those who come from or live in the US. |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #203 (permalink) | ||
| What the Dormouse Said Last Online: Today 03:49 AM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Rabbit Hole
Posts: 5,720
| Quote:
The three Democratic presidential hopefuls leading in early preference polls...opposed the decision. Obama weighed in with support for the dissenting opinion of Justice Ruth Ginsberg, who wrote that the ruling “tolerates, indeed applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.” Oh, teenage girl gets preggers and decides to end the life inside of her so she can go party some more. If it IS a matter of life or death for the mom, I agree. "In his statement, Obama said he was “extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a woman’s right to choose, and that the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to erode Roe v. Wade</SPAN>, which is established federal law and a matter of equal rights for women.” I disagree. The baby has no voice in the matter, and it is a living entity. Reaction to Court’s Abortion Ruling Falls Along Predictable Party Lines - New York Times No they aren't, Ray. You are looking for a utopian America. You are out of step. | ||
| | |
| | #204 (permalink) | |||
| rafiki's sidekick Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: deleting posts in issues
Posts: 4,877
| first of all, you're either very confused....or being disingenuous. 1. boon mee posted that obama "opposed any bans on partial birth abortions"---and let's just put aside for a moment how pejorative that description is. 2. i asked him to provide a link indicating that obama took this position. 3. you put up an NYT article which only states that obama's reaction to a supreme court ruling was that he was, Quote:
nice try. next! Quote:
but as boon mee posted.... Quote:
__________________ "Is Obama a Muslim, or a Christian with a crazy pastor or a Communist atheist with a hippie mom? Is he ruthless and overly ambitious or naive and weak? Is he an outsider who is "foreign" to our values or a country club goer? Is he too South Side, too "black" or too Hyde Park and elitist? Does he resent white people or is he part of the elite that sneers at blue-collars? Does he not care about "little people" or is he a socialist who will redistribute hard-earned money to everyone?" | |||
| | |
| | #205 (permalink) | ||
| rafiki's sidekick Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: deleting posts in issues
Posts: 4,877
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #206 (permalink) | ||
| Sundance is my bff | Michelle Obama obviously has strong views on this Wright debacle. I watched her reaction, sitting by Barak's side while he was explaining the Wright issue. She gave a CNN interview today. Michelle Obama: Let's move past Wright, get back to issues Quote:
Quote:
I admire her spunk and intelligence. I have a feeling there are lots of things smoldering under her cool surface, but she's smart to exercise restraint. She'll need it in the White House..... | ||
| | |
| | #207 (permalink) |
| Farang phoot mak Last Online: Today 02:14 AM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 7,466
| ^What's the difference between moving forward and turning the page? It is what it is and they can't escape it, they have to deal with it. I personally think the "blue-collars have to cling to guns and religion" comment will resonate far longer in the minds of voters. |
| | |
| | #208 (permalink) |
| Watching the Wheels Last Online: Yesterday 07:15 AM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: east of Pattaya
Posts: 7,266
| Good old Faux are going for the jugular on this rather trivial issue. Considering the massive media attention to it (Much, much more than devoted to such small things as, say, what Obama proposes to do about the economy, and Iraq) I have to ask a question- is this really so important to the average American? It's quite clear to me that the Republicans want Hillary to win the Dem nomination- shit, right now they're amongst her biggest fans. Why might that be? ![]() This fact alone should give rational people pause for thought. But are electorates rational?
__________________ East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet, |
| | |
| | #209 (permalink) | ||
| Sundance is my bff | ^^Well, here you go: Obama's wife joins push to court working class Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #210 (permalink) | |
| Sundance is my bff | Quote:
Fox seems to be on a "destroy Obama" mission right now, so they must think McCain has a better chance against Hilary than against Obama. | |
| | |
| | #211 (permalink) |
| Farang phoot mak Last Online: Today 02:14 AM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 7,466
| Michelle Obama can try to court the middle class all she wants. But it's painfully obvious that two Harvard lawyers, one a US senator and one a hospital administrator, that combined for a cool mil every year since 05, are not typical middle class folk. Maybe she thinks the connection would come naturally because she's black (working a negative stereotype to her favor). Empathy, OK. Understanding certainly. But the whole, "I'm here with you," line is a bit much. Certainly the McCains and Clintons wouldn't try it. Wonder why Michelle is. |
| | |
| | #213 (permalink) |
| Watching the Wheels Last Online: Yesterday 07:15 AM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: east of Pattaya
Posts: 7,266
| ^^ I basically agree. Presidential contenders are not everyday normal folk, so why should they pretend to be so? Accuse them of being elitist, how terrible. Of course they're bluddy elitist, they're running for the Presidency. Michelle's definitely humble beginnings, and subsequent achievements, might score a degree of empathy with some. As might Obamas growing up in a one parent family- although middle class really. Dunno- was this considered a positive factor in Bill Clintons election? Or, conversely, was Bushes rather large silver spoon (both of them) considered a negative factor in running for Pres? You certainly could not accuse them of being normal folk. |
| | |
| | #215 (permalink) |
| Sundance is my bff | ^Stroller is right. The scars, if you want to call them that, of being raised poor and disadvantaged, then struggling to and reaching high success, never leave someone. Hilary again, today, did a great job of circumventing O'Reilly's usual tricks. She called herself and him wealthy people who were blessed. She completely diffused the issue by not trying to pretend she's normal folk. Don't think they serve beer on Bill's show though... |
| | |
| | #217 (permalink) |
| Watching the Wheels Last Online: Yesterday 07:15 AM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: east of Pattaya
Posts: 7,266
| ^ Left leaning might be your gettout clause there. The official Leftist ideology is Atheism booner. But I really don't see why such a huge fuss. The way I grew up, if some scatty Priest spouted nonsense, people just shrugged their shoulders. |
| | |