![]() |
| |||||||
| US Domestic Issues Topics which focus on issues within the US or concern those who come from or live in the US. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #141 (permalink) | ||
| Take No Prisoners Barbie Last Online: Yesterday 04:08 PM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Near Libbies
Posts: 13,039
| Quote:
An analysis released Monday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office raised the hurdles for draft legislation in the Senate just as its Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee planned to begin voting on Wednesday. The office concluded that a plan by the committee’s Democratic leaders, Senators Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts and Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, would reduce the number of uninsured only by a net 16 million people. Even if the bill became law, the budget office said, 36 million people would remain uninsured in 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/he...y/16obama.html | ||
| | |
| | #142 (permalink) | |
| I am in Jail Last Online: 07-02-2010 05:28 AM Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,310
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #143 (permalink) |
| Take No Prisoners Barbie Last Online: Yesterday 04:08 PM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Near Libbies
Posts: 13,039
| Interesting. Why are the unions (being big Obama supporters and all) against this change and the taxation that will likely be applied to these "greedy" folks who get these bennies ($15k-$22k in health benefits for union members a year)? |
| | |
| | #144 (permalink) | |
| Nakhon Ratchasima Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 248
| Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/21/he...er=rss&emc=rss Americans overwhelmingly support substantial changes to the health care system and are strongly behind one of the most contentious proposals Congress is considering, a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll. The poll found that most Americans would be willing to pay higher taxes so everyone could have health insurance and that they said the government could do a better job of holding down health-care costs than the private sector.
__________________
| |
| | |
| | #145 (permalink) |
| Thailand Travel Forum Last Online: Yesterday 10:58 PM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: deleting posts in issues
Posts: 6,950
| yes, americans do overwhelmingly support a govt. administered health insurance program. June 21, 2009 ![]() ![]() ![]() http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2009/06/21/health/policy/21poll_graphic_ready.html![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #146 (permalink) |
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 16,405
| There is a lot of propaganda right now about the health care system and possible ways to improve it. It's so complicated that I don't follow it too closely. But once again, as a US citizen I know first hand how bad the health care is in the US. Something has to be done. I don't know what but something has to be done. An acquaintance of mine works full time, and has no health insurance. Got in a motorbike accident wearing a helmet. had scrapes and bruises, but also a very bad headache. He went to ER. Cat Scan of his brain $3,000+ and patches = a total bill of over $6,000+ USD. |
| | |
| | #148 (permalink) | |
| Days Work Done! Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Roiet
Posts: 12,478
| Quote:
Last edited by Norton : 22-06-2009 at 01:45 PM. | |
| | |
| | #149 (permalink) |
| Take No Prisoners Barbie Last Online: Yesterday 04:08 PM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Near Libbies
Posts: 13,039
| ^ 55555 Costs for who, Norts? What's the CBO estimate for the plan? Over $1.6 tril now innit? Oh ya, but folks' individual costs will go down coz their care with also go down and docs and hospitals will say FO. Hello, United States of Canada/France/UK/Japan. |
| | |
| | #150 (permalink) | |
| Days Work Done! Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Roiet
Posts: 12,478
| Quote:
Think it is 1 trillion based Sen. Kennedy "plan". Any plan for public health care will be the outcome of the what Congress pens in the next few months. Until that comes out all cost estimates and debate are simply speculation. With 72% of the public favoring "public health care" as per the New York times poll above, appears it will happen. Simply a matter waiting to see the details. For the moment, opponents of public health care will just have to use that oft used label of "socialism" to garner support to retain what by any measure is a failed US health care system.
__________________ There is such a thing as a nation being so right that it does not need to convince others by force that it is right. Woodrow Wilson | |
| | |
| | #151 (permalink) | ||
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 16,405
| Quote:
Medicare is scheduled to be insolved in about 6 years and 10 months - less than 7 years from now, in the year 2016. Even with curbing the cost increases (if this can even be done) the 77 million people born from 1946 to 1964 are hitting rolls. It's an "Age Wave." | ||
| | |
| | #152 (permalink) |
| Guest Member Last Online: Yesterday 06:59 PM Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Khon Kaen
Posts: 1,579
| Why not competition? Obama: Why would it drive private insurance out of business? If private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality health care; if they tell us that they’re offering a good deal, then why is it that the government, which they say can’t run anything, suddenly is going to drive them out of business? That’s not logical. Link: Campaign Silo » Obama: If Private Insurers Are Such Crack Businesses, How Can “Incompetent” Government Put Them Out of Business?
__________________ Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer. |
| | |
| | #153 (permalink) |
| Take No Prisoners Barbie Last Online: Yesterday 04:08 PM Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Near Libbies
Posts: 13,039
| ^ Because the government will take over and tell biz what to do? Perhaps the govt should just take care of the folks who do not have healthcare (and many will not join up), including the 10mil or so illegal immigrants. |
| | |
| | #154 (permalink) |
| Go ask Alice Last Online: Today 12:11 AM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: where the streets have no name
Posts: 12,383
| I don't know exactly what shape or form the Healthcare system will take in the USA, it appears several details are still being worked out. Certainly, if large amounts of US people are left uninsured then you are not dealing with a national health care system at all- but I doubt this will be the case. Currently, if you have either a privately or employer sponsored healthcare scheme in the US that is comprehensive you are one of the lucky ones. By comprehensive, I mean :- - one that is not full of holes & exclusions (so that you cannot be kicked out of the plan if, for example you are diagnosed with diabetes). - a plan that covers both yourself and your dependants - a plan that does not lapse if you lose your job Most Americans, it would appear, are not in this position- which is a remarkable 'Sword of Damocles' for the citizens of arguably the worlds most advanced nation to have hanging over their heads. Bear in mind the citizens of all other advanced nations are born with this entitlement. Not to mention some distinctly unadvanced nations like Cuba. So anything has got to be an improvement on the current system! The other aspects that are fairly clear are that substantial cost efficiencies can be extracted from the current healthcare system (or lack thereof)- but no one is pretending State healthcare will be free; and that consumers will have the right to choose between a Government Health insurance plan and a private- although, predictably, private health insurers do not want competition from the government. Well bully for them. In other countries, Private health insurance covers the Premium options, government health insurance the basics. It will likely go the same way in the states.
__________________ Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. |
| | |
| | #155 (permalink) |
| Thailand Travel Forum | This guy is losing it even faster than we thought! BO's MICHAEL DUKAKIS MOMENT on health care. “If ObamaCare isn’t good enough for Sasha, Malia, or Michelle, then it’s not good enough for America.” ![]() |
| | |
| | #156 (permalink) |
| Karon Beach Last Online: 26-06-2009 07:18 AM Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
| Children and seniors should be both cared for I think that during the extreme states in man's life, being so young and being so old, he should be taken cared of. They are usually the helpless portion of society. Infants and kids cannot tend to themselves as yet. The seniors have gone through their lot in life and already needs to rest. Better take good care of them both! |
| | |
| | #157 (permalink) |
| Guest Member Last Online: Yesterday 06:59 PM Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Khon Kaen
Posts: 1,579
| ^yes!,.there should be some type of safety net. Other news,…………….. Public health care option should start from day one! STFU Senator Kerry! Please! Under the plan floated by Kerry, a public health care option would only be triggered by private insurance companies failing to meet certain criteria after ten years. Known as the "trigger" in legislative lingo, the idea is vociferously opposed by health care advocates who consider it the death of reform. Link: Campaign Silo » John Kerry, you said what? |
| | |
| | #159 (permalink) |
| Guest Member Last Online: Yesterday 06:59 PM Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Khon Kaen
Posts: 1,579
| My position (also),……………. You're never going to get a decent healthcare bill by pandering to Republicans, and with 76% of Americans in favor of a public option, you're not going to please them and please the public at the same time. Most likely, pleasing Republicans will just get used as an excuse to do what Kay Hagan wants, which is give the insurance industry everything it wants. We need a public plan that is:
F’em, we’ll go it alone |
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |