Thread: Is homosexuality natural?

Originally Posted by blackgang

Seems like from the last few names on the posts that they are trying to claim it is a natural thing to be a fruit,, and for those 2 it is a natural thing, so don't worry about it as everyone knows that youse dudes are Fags.

Do you spend a lot of time giving thought to my sexual habits and proclivities blackgang?

Because I don't give a second thought to yours, despite your rather boastful nature and salacious details that you post on the forum -- in fact probably because of that. Trust me.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Are you calling me a poof?

I have twin boys to prove that I'm not... Or I am and are just very deeply closeted.

Never took that DNA test did you ?


I'll send along a pubic hair for it ....

Originally Posted by blackgang

and for those 2 it is a natural thing

Betting you didn't intend it but this is the correct answer. Different strokes for different folks.

Originally Posted by The Fresh Prince

Homosexuality is a natural, uncontrollable thing that's built into their DNA. Sticking things up their bums comes from the need to 'get off' and is not natural but apparently does the job.

I agree, more or less. A person's sexual orientation is set during gestation and how they actually reach a climax is beside the point. Whether it's oral, anal, or humping their partner's leg whilst smelling his shoes is beside the point.
The original question was "Is it natural" ? A more specific question might be something like : "is sexual orientation controlled by pathways in the brain" ? The answer must be "yes". I have seen too many gays here in Thailand who, even at a young age, look physically different from hetero guys.

Yea, them is the ones with the silicone tits and their dick tied back into the crack of their ass.

The formulaic Teakdoor response.

Clause A) Categorical statement about science, DNA or genetics. (Uncited and invariably self-determined)

followed by

Clause B) A florid euphemism for anal sex, using a colourful gerund ('sticking' 'shoving', 'ramming'), and a kindergarten anatomical reference, ('Botty', 'Poo hole')

Strange how the same people are drawn to this subject, (in order to proclaim their disgust of it). It sounds like a meeting of American, holier than thou, right wing evangelists,

I have not read all the thread...but has KingWilliam chimed in yet with his affirmative ??

I know a guy that went of to the toilet to measure up his penis with a ladyboy once......

question is, how did they get hard so as to measure ??


ladyboy won by the way...

Originally Posted by blackgang

their dick tied back into the crack of their ass

and how would you know that ?

Originally Posted by graym

I, like most blokes I suppose, find female homosexuality erotic and male abhorrent.

There is where we differ a great deal.
I find all forms of homosexuality abhorrent, as well as Porn fuck flicks or movies or what ever you want to call them as they do nothing for me and I find them boring, I would watch Nat Geo or Discovery, but not sex videos.
Not that I am against them, you can watch what you want, but for myself , they are not for me anymore than going in a topless bar when they were the thing and I drank, but I just could not see going in a bar to drink and paying 1$ for a 15 cent glass of beer and the fucking music so loud you could not talk and some naked [at][at][at][at] with her ass in your face.
If I wanted that shit, I would have stayed home..

Originally Posted by graym

The only animals that partake in homosexuality are humans. Other animals perform homosexual acts for territorial instincts only. In fact, the only creature that has sex for pleasure besides humans are dolphins... Studies show homosexuality does not exist in dolphins.

Wrong, very wrong.

Two links for ya:

Love That Dare Not Squeak Its Name - NYTimes.com


Homosexual Activity Among Animals Stirs Debate

Was going to comment but I see its already been discussed.

The fact that the genes are not bred out doesn't make any sense to me....

how can it be natural when they can't reproduce ?

Originally Posted by peterpan

Only queers and their fellow travelers, seeking to justifying their aberrational behavior would argue for the affirmative in this one.

Basic minds, to be kind and diplomatic, can only argue the side on which they stand. Thus we have the usual drivel proliferating from those basic minds that if you argue something, you must be it.

Simple minds require a simple world to operate in else they are insecure, confused and scared. Hey presto, we have made-to-order sheep.

Thank allah for them.

'Arguments' such as 'you are a faggot' abound. Buriramboy tried to show whats natural and unnatural, but soon had to abandon the argument because he ran out of ideas quickly. Predictable resort to 'I know what I know, faggot.'

My mind is not made up on the issue. I argue, and sometimes I'm sure there's holes, and sometimes I may talk total crap, and in order to improve my own ideas I expect someone to point them out, that's discussion. But don't come with 'it is like that because you're talking bullshit', it ain't no argument. All it shows is your ideas stretch only as far as 'I'll fuck that bargirl tonite, I'll eat somtam and piss in the sink'.

Then I have to remind myself to just rather shaddup and make crude remarks about Ozzies, Brits and Septics, because it appears to be as far as most posters' imagination will stretch.

Most Ozzies are faggots, anyhoo.

Originally Posted by FlyFree

Basic minds, to be kind and diplomatic, can only argue the side on which they stand.

So in this thread that would be the back side? (Well we are discussing base urges)...

It's natural in the sense that it occurs in nature, however wherever it occurs it is an aberration.
Male and female parts are made to fit together as they do for a reason.

Let's not forget that humans are rather flawed. Being born with physical deformities has never been bred out of us. Nor has kidney disease, manic depression, schizophrenia and other mental illness. Are there any survival advantages to these ?
We do not live in an ideal world. Those who have unusual traits have every right to accomodate those traits as long as they do no harm to others.
Think for a minute : how many people endure some kind of unusual mental / physical trait that nature gave them ?
Seeing gay people kissing offends my personal sensibilities, but they have a right to do it.

Side joke :
The actor David Niven was once sitting next to a ship's captain who had been drinking, and who turned to him and said " I have had sex with women of many nations and most animals, but if there is one thing I can't stand, it's a woman with a Glasgow accent".

And so, by a master stroke of reasoning, ignoring all that went before, to suit the cultural/religioius programming, you define gays as mentally ill / diseased. And just to show your kind, probably Judean(?)-Christian nature, and what a really sporting bloke you are, you kindly accept the faggots into your world, diseased as they are. Should I perhaps add a 'Praise the Lord'?


1% of Ozzies are potentially gay.

Originally Posted by FlyFree

Originally Posted by Dug

It's natural in the sense that it occurs in nature, however wherever it occurs it is an aberration.
Male and female parts are made to fit together as they do for a reason.

Aberration? It occurs everywhere in nature.

yes it occurs everywhere in nature as do other birth defects.