... and you thought your Family Tree was complicated!

**David48atTD** · 03-04-2019, 01:22 AM

Grandmother gives birth as surrogate for her son and his husband

A 61-year-old woman has given birth to her own granddaughter in the United States after serving as a surrogate for her son and his husband.

Key points:

Cecile Eledge, 61, wanted to help her son Matthew and his husband Elliot Dougherty become parents
Elliot Dougherty's sister provided the egg, which was fertilised and implanted
The couple said the birth of their daughter was due to the "selfless women" in their lives

The woman, Cecile Eledge, from Nebraska, had been through menopause but was nonetheless approved for surrogacy.
She volunteered to carry the child for nine months and give birth in order to help her son, Matthew Eledge, and his husband, Elliot Dougherty, become parents.

The couple have told media that the birth of their first child was possible due to the "selfless women" in their lives.

... and you thought your Family Tree was complicated!-10964436-3x2-940x627-jpg

... and you thought your Family Tree was complicated!-10964436-3x2-940x627-jpg

Matthew Eledge, right, and his husband Elliot Dougherty were thrilled to meet their daughter Uma.

The egg was donated by Mr Dougherty's sister.
Doctors fertilised the egg using Mr Eledge's sperm,
and the embryo was then implanted in his mother's womb.
Ms Eledge gave birth to a baby girl, named Uma, last week at the Nebraska Medical Centre in Omaha.

Here

**baldrick** · 03-04-2019, 09:10 AM

it is a bit straitlaced as no shagging was involved

**kmart** · 03-04-2019, 09:22 AM

Mom just needs a beard to complete the Freak Show.

**happynz** · 03-04-2019, 09:25 AM

Only thing, and I mean the only thing that bothers me is the bloke with the earlobe plugs. I don't know why that bothers me, but it does.

**Seekingasylum** · 03-04-2019, 09:42 AM

The preposterous "marriage" will collapse fairly soon, eventually one or other will not be able to forego the frisson of public urinal sex, and the child will revert to the care of the mother.
This contrived birth farming to sustain deviant relationships, irrespective of their official recognition, is nothing more than a symptom of the modern malaise in which moral compasses are re-calibrated to guide inadequates into turpitude and not out.

**Loy Toy** · 03-04-2019, 10:00 AM

Originally Posted by happynz

Only thing, and I mean the only thing that bothers me is the bloke with the earlobe plugs.

Reminds me of this guy.

**AntRobertson** · 03-04-2019, 10:13 AM

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

deviant relationships, irrespective of their official recognition, is nothing more than a symptom of the modern malaise in which moral compasses are re-calibrated to guide inadequates into turpitude and not out.

Yeah...

Bloody Brexiters aye!

**Latindancer** · 03-04-2019, 10:30 AM

I reckon he looks like the younger Gary Oldman :

... and you thought your Family Tree was complicated!-gary1-jpg

... and you thought your Family Tree was complicated!-earplugboy-jpg

**baldrick** · 03-04-2019, 10:44 AM

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

deviant relationships

yes - they are turning their back on tradition by not just being fcuked by priests

**Seekingasylum** · 03-04-2019, 12:00 PM

Indeed, they are quite literally producing a freak generation of wankstains.

**Cujo** · 04-04-2019, 12:22 PM

I think it's grotesque actually.
They have the right to be as gay as they like and to live whatever lifestyle they want.
The don't have the right to involve a human life.
There's a reason they can't have a baby. They just need to accept it.
I've got no problem with gays but this shit really pisses me off for some reason.
They do NOT have a RIGHT to have a baby.

**jabir** · 04-04-2019, 03:06 PM

In for a penny...they do have the right to that accessory; in fact if they went for adoption they're as if not more likely to be accepted over a straight couple.

And in our mad world objectors risk criminal prosecution.

**Looper** · 04-04-2019, 03:07 PM

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

Only thing, and I mean the only thing that bothers me is the bloke with the earlobe plugs.

Those earlobe plate things are against nature and simply wrong.

Originally Posted by baldrick

it is a bit straitlaced as no shagging was involved

That would have been most fucked up thing ever if the daddy-poove had shagged his partners mum!

**happynz** · 04-04-2019, 03:10 PM

Originally Posted by Cujo

They do NOT have a RIGHT to have a baby.

They're consenting adults and the State and medical establishment apparently had no objections, so by default they do have the right. Whether you agree with their decision or not is your right, but has no bearing on their actions.

**Neverna** · 04-04-2019, 03:19 PM

The gay partner must feel left out. His gay lover/husband, the gay lover's sister and the gay lover's mother were all involved in the baby making but not him.

**happynz** · 04-04-2019, 03:22 PM

Give him nappie duty. The slacker hasn't contributed so far, so it's only right.

**Looper** · 04-04-2019, 03:57 PM

Originally Posted by happynz

The slacker hasn't contributed so far, so it's only right.

The non-related poove is the one that cracked one off to provide the man-goo.

Or maybe he got the BF to do it for him to make the whole thing more involved and family oriented.

The kid will have a story to tell when he grows up about his dad wanking his other dad off (or was it bum-farted yellowish colour out into the test tube?) and putting it inside his gran with an egg from his auntie!

Thread: ... and you thought your Family Tree was complicated!

Thread Tools

Display

... and you thought your Family Tree was complicated!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions