Thread: Nancy boys can have their cake and eat it

I actually had some respect for Nigel. Not any more. Queer-bashing thug.

Nigel should take it as a compliment that someone fancies him. You must still be good-looking, Nige. Maybe you can post up a nice photo of your arse so the members can make their own minds up.

oh well Ireland will have a referendon on Gay marriage this Friday.
Does any so called religion mentioned here have the Moral high ground on this.

Funny how a young girl, aggressively accosted and bothered by a male in the ladies toilet would be considered a hero for knocking 7 bells out of him, and then sticking his head down the shitter bowl.

However Swop the young girl for a young male targeted by a fagot and for some reason all support and sympathy flies out of the window.
The young male is supposed to take it all as a lark..
You'd never say that to the girl...
What happened to gender equality YOU Political correct claim to love so much ?


Time to have separate toilets for homos.

Hopefully the tide is turning on support for poofs, I remember the early 80's when they were gaining support almost acceptance , Instead the public became disgusted with them for giving society AIDS.

Maybe history is repeating itself and again normal people are getting sick of gays , this time perhaps because they are slowing seeing what nasty disgusting skin crawlingly filthy paedo beasts they are .


About 6 years ago I used to have to visit Leytonstone in East London,
There was a mens public toilet near the tube station- .
I never went in and it looked like no normal people did- they was always a faggot or two loitering about , ( why are gays so classless? )
Anyway, one day I'm walking past, theres a big sign up
POLICE Notice - or something -I thought thank fuck, they are finally cleaning up the filthy gays dogging habit.
So read the sign.
It was a warning a threat that homophobic attacks either verbal or physical would not be tolerated ...

what a crappy country- hopefully the tide will turn soon.

Originally Posted by blue

hopefully the tide will turn soon.

its been around for as long as prostitution maybe even a lot longer.

its not going away blue, if anything it seems to be gaining popularity.

look at what the media put out today

scores of politicians, scores of sports people, many in the entertainment business, clergy etc.
all committing some kind of sexual abuse on vulnerables.

what would you expect when authority tells you how to behave in sexual matters.
for hundreds of years. 1000s even.

the outcome has got to go weird for many, including yourself.

Originally Posted by blue

What happened to gender equality YOU Political correct claim to love so much ?

There is not and never was any such thing.

Male on Male
Male on Female
Female on Male
Female on Female

are 4 entirely different scenarios with entirely different sexual dynamics.

Why the law does not admit to such in anything other than sentencing guidelines is a mystery to me.

Originally Posted by blue

Funny how a young girl, aggressively accosted and bothered by a male in the ladies toilet would be considered a hero for knocking 7 bells out of him, and then sticking his head down the shitter bowl.
...

Really, do you find this moronic comparison 'funny'?

I am actually shocked at some of the archaic, homophobic comments on this thread.

Nigel, when you have lost the 70 kilos of weight you need to, perhaps then you can be concerned that anyone, even a man, would be attracted to you. How many buns and pies have you eaten this week?!!

And Looper, thinking that homosexuality is a disease or a dna abnormality is just downright stupid.

Blue, well Blue is just Blue.

You are racists. Ignorant racists.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Looper

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.

Matthew 7:12

Never had you pegged as closet Jesus wheezer Harry! I'll see your Matthew and raise you a bit of proper bible Old Testament learnin...

If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them

Leviticus 20:13

Well that one's easy to answer.

Dear Dr. Laura,

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them.

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27. How should they die?

i) I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev 24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help.

Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your devoted disciple and adoring fan.

Superb!

You must spread the love (gay or otherwise) around before giving it out again

Originally Posted by patsycat

I am actually shocked at some of the archaic, homophobic comments on this thread.

Nigel, when you have lost the 70 kilos of weight you need to, perhaps then you can be concerned that anyone, even a man, would be attracted to you. How many buns and pies have you eaten this week?!!

And Looper, thinking that homosexuality is a disease or a dna abnormality is just downright stupid.

Blue, well Blue is just Blue.

You are racists. Ignorant racists.

Don't you mean homophobes,patsy?

Originally Posted by nigelandjan

Bwaaaaaah ! I'm sorry Dr. B if I don't fit into your PC crowd :roll eyes: BTW just for your info back in the day I would front up to almost anyone who wanted to attack me in anyway , this wasn't just the preserve of poofs The term " Queer Bashing " was the preserve of individuals , usually in groups who set out with the sole intent of seeking poofs out and giving them a coating . I was never a member of a group like that or ever took part in anything like that. You have misquoted me and now my respect for you has gone to .

Looks like Nigel wants to have his cake and eat it and have seconds and thirds.

Or perhaps he used the term 'nancy boys' as a compliment.

Originally Posted by patsycat

You are racists. Ignorant racists.

Psst Patsy, gay isn't a race.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by patsycat

I am actually shocked at some of the archaic, homophobic comments on this thread.

Nigel, when you have lost the 70 kilos of weight you need to, perhaps then you can be concerned that anyone, even a man, would be attracted to you. How many buns and pies have you eaten this week?!!

And Looper, thinking that homosexuality is a disease or a dna abnormality is just downright stupid.

Blue, well Blue is just Blue.

You are racists. Ignorant racists.

Don't you mean homophobes,patsy?

She's drunk, she doesn't know what she means.

Originally Posted by DrB0b

I actually had some respect for Nigel. Not any more. Queer-bashing thug.

Prime example of the PC bullshit that has now infested this forum.

My post is removed because I referred benders and immigrants as voting fodder. Yet your insult is acceptable.

BTW, for the PC nutters, thug is now considered racist.

You are racists. Ignorant racists.

homophobic

any port in a storm for champagne socialists.

Originally Posted by taxexile

You are racists. Ignorant racists.

homophobic

any port in a storm for champagne socialists.

& caviar dreams...

Originally Posted by patsycat

And Looper, thinking that homosexuality is a disease or a dna abnormality is just downright stupid.

Hey Patsy,

The thread proposition is likely to be slightly jarring to anyone who has grown accustomed to the PC mores of today's society. However I am not trolling to cause offence. I think it is a genuinely revealing question to contemplate.

Think about it. Life for homosexuals is harder than life for heterosexuals for many obvious reasons. Society also has the problem how to deal with homosexuality.

If you could take a human embryo and test it for genetic homosexuality and then repair it so it would be heterosexual then that person will have an easier and more fulfilling life and society's challenges will be reduced, so my answer to the OP question has to be a considered and resounding 'yes'.

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

Originally Posted by DrB0b

I actually had some respect for Nigel. Not any more. Queer-bashing thug.

Prime example of the PC bullshit that has now infested this forum.

My post is removed because I referred benders and immigrants as voting fodder. Yet your insult is acceptable.

BTW, for the PC nutters, thug is now considered racist.

This thread was started in news
it should have been started in the lounge
it was then moved to so called Speakers Corner, no doubt so that the gay enabler mod who does shifts here, and aggressively polices the ''Same sex marriage in usa '' thread, can shape it to his liking ..

Still TD is better than anywhere else and most comments get through...


Queer bashing - a practice up to the 1980s.
Is that an example of tough love ?

I bet there are thousands of gays who got targeted, then questioned if they were following the right path and decided it was time to get cured; and are today normal , happy, and very thankful someone took the trouble to nudge them back to a wholesome life.

Today the fact that there is no bashings coupled with an explosion in cases of homosexuality must be more than a coincidence ...

I'm not suggesting a return to violence - just that we need to recognize there's a nasty problem and channel money to find a cure for gayness, it's only fair , they are tax payers too.

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

Originally Posted by DrB0b

I actually had some respect for Nigel. Not any more. Queer-bashing thug.

Prime example of the PC bullshit that has now infested this forum.

My post is removed because I referred benders and immigrants as voting fodder. Yet your insult is acceptable.

BTW, for the PC nutters, thug is now considered racist.

I believe in today's standards, PC perspectives can be interpreted in a variety of ways - not exclusive to any such left or right identities.

I would go out on a limb and suggest that the mod policy here is not based on PC tendencies, but something more universal accepted or policy/personal driven. I believe TD still attempts to keep politically and socially neutral, even though there have been instances [from certain mod personalities] in the past and present that personal bias has entered the picture.

Read this every day in one form or another - members whining about this or that "PC bullshit" that their posts are deleted for "PC" biased reasons blah blah blah...

Observe all the shit that is free to remain throughout threads of every sort.
We should be so lucky -
Could be worse.

You want PC suppressed goodness......witness all the other forums. Makes TD look like an open free-for-all.

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

Originally Posted by DrB0b

I actually had some respect for Nigel. Not any more. Queer-bashing thug.

Prime example of the PC bullshit that has now infested this forum.

My post is removed because I referred benders and immigrants as voting fodder. Yet your insult is acceptable.

BTW, for the PC nutters, thug is now considered racist.

Just seen that post on the other thread.

#78 http://teakdoor.com/speakers-corner/...ml#post3019239

Originally Posted by hazz

Have you not noticed regularity with which many of the most vociferous anti gay pedlers ultimately end up falling from grace in some gay sex scandal?

Hazz, trying to suggest that people who have a problem with the homosexual political movement are actually gay was already old even before the word 'gay' was hijacked by the homosexual lobby.

Originally Posted by hazz

which is why people like yourself.... find yourself countering people quoting the new testament by countering with the old testament. When you finally get to meet saint peter at the pearly gate... are you really going to argue that god does not have to change his mind and that by using the old testament to abrogate the new... you were doing gods work and therefore don't deserve to spend eternity with old harry.

I think you are over-analysing that short episode of bible-jousting. I was just having a bit of light-hearted bible-banter with my favourite closet jesus wheezer and good friend Harry.

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

Originally Posted by DrB0b

I actually had some respect for Nigel. Not any more. Queer-bashing thug.

Prime example of the PC bullshit that has now infested this forum.

My post is removed because I referred benders and immigrants as voting fodder. Yet your insult is acceptable.

BTW, for the PC nutters, thug is now considered racist.

Just seen that post on the other thread.

#78 http://teakdoor.com/speakers-corner/...ml#post3019239

Hey MissKit,

Getting confusing with all these gay threads. I replied to Patsy and thought I was in the other thread.

Mods, when are we getting the gay issues sub-forum?

Can I be a mod?

You are already a mod.