Originally Posted by
Fozzy
You put 100 cases like this in court and ....
I'll stop you there .
if there were that many cases and more, it would be one happy country !
Half the problem is young men not getting any action.
Originally Posted by
Fozzy
You don't get shy, nervous, quiet 16 year old boys then? They must be fags and not deserve protection right?
Indeed , that shy 16 year old could easily turn gay , just what he needs a couple of stocking wearing teachers to show him the feminine delights and bring him out of his shell.
Originally Posted by
kingwilly
How do you know he has not been negatively affected? You dont.
How do you know he has not been positively affected and his life greatly enriched ; you don't
Originally Posted by
kingwilly
does anyone of you have the qualifications, skill and experience to tell me that the boy is not a victim?
Well just the fact that he was so full and bursting with pride that he bragged about it to all his mates , hardly a trait of a victim .
Originally Posted by
kingwilly
Please answer the question, are you more qualified than the experts?
Yes
Because all of them have to be !00% politically correct to get the job , and as such are totally brainwashed- any normal person with a reasonable level of intelegence would be more qualified .
Originally Posted by
chassamui
I believe the legal age of consent was raised in civilised society in order to protect the vulnerable.
Well, raised from say 12 to 16 I agree , and that was mostly to give hesitant girls a good reason to say no.
Age of consent of 18 in USA is ridiculous.
The only reason i can think to jail these 2 teacher is if the 16 year old was a nigger , then I say throw away the keys .
But i doubt he was , the teachers dont look that thick .