So what about 2 male teachers banging a 16 year old boy?Males ...
Females ...
What about 2 female teachers with a 16 female?
What if these two teachers were over 50?
What if they were hideously ugly?
1 male and 1 female teacher with a 16 year old kid of either sex?
What if it started out consensually but later they tied him up and anally raped him?
Tongue ok?
Finger ?
Dildo?
Baseball bat?
Where do you draw the line?
We're not talking about other cases, we are talking about this specific case.
Been abused?? The type of abuse where he loved every minute and went bragging to his mates and now feels bad for the trouble he has got the teachers into.
Maybe he might suffer mentally if the teachers had looked like my avatar, but the only suffering this lad is going to go through is not being able to have another threesome with the teachers.
As I said, you are mistaking your soft porn fantasies with reality
They are being treated equally, the female teachers are going to be charged, lose their jobs and never work in the teaching profession again and maybe do some jail time. But you are correct in that I have double standards as if the sexes had been reversed I'd be outraged but in this particular case I say fair play to the lad, with a disclaimer that I reserve the right to change my opinion in the event of any new evidence coming to light.
All those are wrong, but the lad with the 2 young hot teachers is fine. That is the reality. Outside of PC fantasy land, 2 female teachers with a strapping young lad is fine, 2 male teachers with a young slut is not. There is your line.Originally Posted by kingwilly
I think it's a general rule of thumb that professionals don't fuck clients, unless the job is fucking the clients.
They are not double standards because males and females are entirely different creatures and their respective roles in the game of sex is basically supplier and consumer.
Male teachers should be sentenced much more heavily because their crime is far greater.
The student scored a double home run and brags about it and 2 teachers' careers are over. Not saying the teachers are blameless but they are more likely stupid then predatory.
I don't think anyone is suggesting the teachers shouldn't be punished and what they did was wrong, it's all the bollox that the lad was abused, taken advantage of and will be mentally scarred I take issue with. 16 year olds are going at it like rabbits all over the world, young, dumb and full of cum and this lad hit the jackpot.
^ You're missing the point brb. THIS time he wasn't abused or taken advantage of but the next incident could look exactly the same but the difference being tbe boy WAS abused and taken advantage of. Being lenient to these women would seriously increase the probability of other more serious crimes going undetected and unpunished.
If you are suggesting that it will be easy every time something like this happens to determine accurately if abuse took place and if so how much, you are mistaken. The only obvious option is to move the line so far away that it can never be in any doubt whether a child has been abused or not.
I agree with Buriramboy, 9999 and Looper. No-one has been exploited, and no-one psychologically damaged except the teachers. I remember very well what it was like to be a 16yo boy, and I'm sure that all the other boys in my school (apart from the prissy choirboys) would agree with me that these laws should be changed.
There should be completely different laws for male and female teachers.
Looper articulated it best :
Nonsense. That it why we have individual court cases. And in my opinion, the general rule/law should be that boys are not vulnerable in the same way as girls. Unless they are retarded.
Last edited by Latindancer; 16-10-2014 at 05:16 AM.
I'm not missing the point and I'm only talking about this specific case, not other cases or 'what ifs' in this case and you're agreeing with me that in this case the lad wasn't abused or taken advantage of.
As to being lenient to the women, they have lost their jobs, will never be allowed to teach again and probably unjustifiably in my opinion put on a sex offenders list, surely that is punishment enough and far from lenient and doing jail time is way over the top for a victimless crime.
^ the market is saturated, stiff competition from everywhere..
Stop Press :
Just out now : Males and females are different.
Perhaps there should be different laws ?
Humbert is not a strange monicker at all. However Humbert44 would be.Originally Posted by david44
Originally Posted by buriramboyAnd you gentleman base these decisions upon what extensive experience and professional knowledge ?Originally Posted by Latindancer
Presumably, you are or you work with child psychologists, police, teachers and doctors ?
or are you just making this shit up ?
What a waste of police and court time .
The only psychological damage the 16 year old might face is having to settle for one chick at a time in future .
The school should expel him for having a big mouth and welcome the teachers back .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)