Thread: Paedo Runs Kids Charity In Cambodia

Originally Posted by dirtydog

He married a girl over the age of consent?

But that doesn't sell tabloids.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Originally Posted by jandajoy

Originally Posted by dirtydog

I mean ok you were the fat kid at school, but us more athletic kids were doing 15 year olds whilst at the same age.

This bloke is 65 and has already been convicted once, of statutory rape, and he videoed it, for gods' sake.

You calling him "innocent" DD?

The author of the article has form for sensationalism, blowing things all out of proportion and twisting things to suit his own agenda, which is basically to sell his stories to tabloids in the UK, having met the man on a couple of occassions and know how his dirty little mind works i take everything he writes with a pinch of salt.

Just as well I don't have to listen to FILTH - FaILed in THailand - any more old boy. Your cred went out the window when you admitted working for a Thai 'boiler room'.We have not had a conversation and at a good guess are not likely to have one.

Originally Posted by dirtydog

Originally Posted by Mid

Fletcher has even bought himself a 17-year-old Cambodian bride for £150

Absolutely digusting and depraved, raise the age of consent I reckon, maybe make it 30, yep thats right, no sex till your 30 you dirty disgusting perverts, jees drumond, is this the best you can do?

Reminds me that Simpsons episode where the fat comic shop guy becomes one of the rulers of Springfield and decrees that everyone will have sex just once every 7 years , commenting that will remarkably increase his sexual activity.

Originally Posted by dirtydog

Originally Posted by MeMock

So DD are you saying that it is okay for a 52 year old man to get a 15 year old girl drunk before having sex with her and filming it is okay?

Don't you film your wife whilst having sex?

Sure, if she's doing the ironing.

Originally Posted by HollyGoodhead

wefearourdespot^^envy? I think on another thread, could be mistaken, sorry if I am- didn't you say something about going where the really young girls are? I find it a bit sickening that you wouldn't think about the psychological impact on very young girls being encouraged to put out.

And I find sickening that you don't think about the physiological impact on very young girls who are left without money.I also find sickening that star high paid NGOs can't scrap together 150 quids to "save" one of those poor "children" - like they call all people under 18.

Originally Posted by dirtydog

Originally Posted by MeMock

So DD are you saying that it is okay for a 52 year old man to get a 15 year old girl drunk before having sex with her and filming it is okay?

Don't you film your wife whilst having sex?

Answer the damn question DD. Seriously, answer it.

Originally Posted by Mid

She said: "But we owe $600. How else can I pay this off? Dany wants to help her family. Her future husband is a good man. She feels sorry for him. He comes here and gives everybody food." Scott says he will help the family with their debts and begs her to reconsider.

Indeed we have to save this poor "child" from that dirty paedo.
The integrity of her vagina must be protected at all costs.
To pay off her debts she can always sell a kidney

Originally Posted by dirtydog

Originally Posted by MeMock

So DD are you saying that it is okay for a 52 year old man to get a 15 year old girl drunk before having sex with her and filming it is okay?

Don't you film your wife whilst having sex?

I'm not married, but even if I were, I wouldn't.
I mean, who warrants me that some day in the future the anti paedo brigade doesn't raise the age of consent to 50 years with retroactive effect (same as they did with the 18 years crap) and uses the movie to convict me ?

Originally Posted by dirtydog

And drummond, the title?

Paedo Runs Kids Charity In Cambodia

I mean ok you were the fat kid at school, but us more athletic kids were doing 15 year olds whilst at the same age.

Well of course you know I do not write Mirror headlines. Seems Fletcher's income might dry up. Why don't you sponsor him and share?

Originally Posted by Drummondbkk

Well of course you know I do not write Mirror headlines. Seems Fletcher's income might dry up. Why don't you sponsor him and share?

If the headline is so wrong, and it certainly is, shouldn't the story be withdrawn?

Pedophilia (or paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents (persons age 16 and older) for whom prepubescent children are the primary or exclusive sexual object of their sex drive. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), pedophilia is a paraphilia in which a person has intense and recurrent sexual urges towards and fantasies about children they have either acted on or cause distress or interpersonal difficulty.

Mr Drummond.

Could you please tell us what the age of consent is in Cambodia, as your article refers to the friendship that Fletcher has with a seventeen years old female. Thanks.

Originally Posted by bretby

Mr Drummond.

Could you please tell us what the age of consent is in Cambodia, as your article refers to the friendship that Fletcher has with a seventeen years old female. Thanks.

I don't think he wants to answer that

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...of_Consent.png

OK then Mr Drummond as you are not answering my previous question perhaps you would like to tell us if during your investigations you have found any tangible evidence that Fletcher has committed any crimes of indecency against the children who he is feeding? Thanks.

Oh dear he seems to have logged off...he was there a minute or two ago....

Originally Posted by HollyGoodhead

I find it a bit sickening that you wouldn't think about the psychological impact on very young girls being encouraged to put out.

What do you mean, "very young girls?" Do you mean prepubescent?

If you mean anything else, you trying through sensationalism to sell an agenda as much as the writer of the subject article is trying to sell tabloids.

And reference your statement, I do not see ANYONE in this tread trying to justify or encourage sex with prepubescents.

Originally Posted by bios

Originally Posted by Drummondbkk

Well of course you know I do not write Mirror headlines. Seems Fletcher's income might dry up. Why don't you sponsor him and share?

If the headline is so wrong, and it certainly is, shouldn't the story be withdrawn?

Pedophilia (or paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents (persons age 16 and older) for whom prepubescent children are the primary or exclusive sexual object of their sex drive. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), pedophilia is a paraphilia in which a person has intense and recurrent sexual urges towards and fantasies about children they have either acted on or cause distress or interpersonal difficulty.

Careful, Bios. Poor ole Ripley was trying to point out that that sex with a physically mature female was NOT Pedophilia, and he was TOTALLY CORRECT about that, and he was viciously attacked by several posters.

Ripley did not say that what was done was not illegal (in Britain, at least), nor did he defend the actions of the guy, but you would have thought so by the reaction of some.

By the power vested in me by a text vote on Sky News, by a bloke I met down the pub, who said he knew it for definite, by prurient wishful thinking and by a phone poll in the News Of The World. I proclaim you guilty of paedophilia.

Under the basic principles of English law, every man is innocent until speculated guilty.

Originally Posted by taxexile

this man, a man convicted in the uk of raping a girl 40 years younger than himself, a man who has "bought" himself a wife 50 years younger than himself in cambodia, a relationship that judging by his behaviour in the bars of phnom pen, is based more on sexual fantasy than love or romance, a man who has a penchant for young girls that if not downright paedophilic according to the legal definition, is certainly not far off.

this man, who even by the jaded standards of some posters here, could not be described as anything other than a vile and predatory sleazeball of the highest order, is now engaged in charity work in direct contact with vulnerable kids desperate for money and probably affection in a country where his activities can be concealed. it sound like classic grooming.

he is certainly not the man for this job, and drummond is right for making his activities known to a wide audience. whether he uses sensationalist headlines and copy is not the point here.

its shaven you know

you can just imagine his unshaven face, the spittle at the corner of his mouth, his beery breath and the twitching semi lurking in his piss stained underwear as he was groping this poor girl.

one day some young girl will suffer badly at his hands, he needs to be stopped.

Careful Tax...Drummond may not like competition for his tabloid masterpieces

Originally Posted by wefearourdespot

Originally Posted by HollyGoodhead

wefearourdespot^^envy? I think on another thread, could be mistaken, sorry if I am- didn't you say something about going where the really young girls are? I find it a bit sickening that you wouldn't think about the psychological impact on very young girls being encouraged to put out.

And I find sickening that you don't think about the physiological impact on very young girls who are left without money.I also find sickening that star high paid NGOs can't scrap together 150 quids to "save" one of those poor "children" - like they call all people under 18.

Just need to use your grey matter a little. Now what do you think would happen here if charities announced they would pay cash to mothers if they did not sell off their children to foreigners.

^^^Agreed, you always see who tends to sway the wrong way with these threads, there is one poster who is never absent.