Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat misskit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    48,094

    Dolphins, Fish Stocks Decline Downstream of Laos’s Don Sahong Dam

    Irrawaddy dolphins, a freshwater mammal species now making a comeback in Cambodia, are under increasing threat of extinction in neighboring Laos, where their numbers have dwindled to four under pressure from illegal fishing and construction of the Don Sahong dam on the Mekong River, sources say.


    Distinguished by their large foreheads and short beaks, as many as 18 of the rare dolphins could once be found on the Lao side of an 118-mile stretch of the river, an official of the Fish Conservation Department of the Khong district of Laos’s Champasak province told RFA’s Lao Service.


    “Now, only four are left,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.


    “Recently there were five, including a little one that died just last month because of the severe impact [on its environment].”


    In Laos, fishermen use nets, dynamite, and electricity to trap or kill the dolphins, whose habitat lies just 500 meters downstream from Laos’s controversial Don Sahong dam, the Lao fisheries official said, noting that his department has been doing its best to save them.


    “We have a team constantly patrolling the area, and authorities have also issued a set of strict rules banning the use of destructive methods to catch fish,” he said, adding that protections including the arrests of fishermen and destruction of nets are stronger in neighboring Cambodia, where the number of dolphins is growing.


    “There, they have about 90 Irrawaddy dolphins left,” he said.


    Numbers up in Cambodia


    The number of Irrawaddy dolphins present on the Cambodian side of the river now stands at 92, a recent report by Cambodia’s Fisheries Administration and the World Wide Fund for Nature says, according to an April 23 report by the Associated Press.


    And this represents an increase of 15 percent from an estimate of 50 made in 2015, the AP said.


    “Despite the increase during the latest count, the number of dolphins in the Mekong is still less than half of the 200 counted during the first official census in 1997,” the AP said.


    Fish stocks have meanwhile been in decline for the last five years in the stretch of river downstream from the Don Sahong dam, Lao sources say.


    “In the past, there were a lot of fish in the Mekong River, but nowadays we catch only 30 percent of what we could five years ago,” a fisherman in the Khong district’s Hang Sadam village told RFA’s Lao Service in a recent interview.


    “Before, we would make between $600 and $700 a day from fishing. Today, we can’t even catch enough fish for our own consumption,” he said.


    Nearly 400 households in three villages located below Don Sahong have suffered a dramatic drop in their catch since work began on the dam in late 2015, sources say.


    https://www.rfa.org/english/news/lao...018143011.html

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat OhOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:43 PM
    Location
    Where troubles melt like lemon drops
    Posts
    25,222
    Quote Originally Posted by misskit View Post
    have suffered a dramatic drop in their catch since work began on the dam in late 2015, sources say.
    Is it the locals or the dam builders catching and eating all the fish?

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,555
    Quote Originally Posted by OhOh View Post
    Is it the locals or the dam builders catching and eating all the fish?
    Destruction of spawning grounds reduces stocks so they start taking younger fish thus eliminating fish of breeding age, which reduces stocks further.

    It's a very vicious circle.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat OhOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:43 PM
    Location
    Where troubles melt like lemon drops
    Posts
    25,222
    I was suggesting possible increased numbers of people, the construction crews/local government overseers/Environmental protection staff etc. Who would likely need local food and those existing inhabitants, in the immediate area down stream of the unfinished dam, would increase demand for more fish be caught. Presumably once the dam construction is finished the environment will revert back to the original peaceful state.

    Were any conditions made when the dam was being discussed, prior to gaining approval, to ensure the disruptive but necessary local upsets, would be managed to the satisfaction of those upset locals. Were funds to be put aside by the local government or dam owners to cover these types of upsets to the established norms/rural idyll/undeveloped backwater?

    If not who is to blame? I suggest those who signed off on the project and reaped the commission/fees/kickbacks/political enhancement. Not the as implied, money grabbing, unscrupulous, foreign, devils.

    Having been involved in creating and administration multi year, multi million pound contracts negotiations with government agencies and multi national companies, leaving these types of questions unasked and thus not included in contracts, leads to disappointed stake holders.

    Due diligence is demanded and accepted, on all contract participants. To allow otherwise is a dereliction of duties and can lead to legal actions against those who are accused. Leading to fines, prison or, allegedly in some countries, death by AA cannons/lethal injection or god forbid, banning from social media platforms.
    Last edited by OhOh; 02-05-2018 at 09:45 AM.
    A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •