Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 88
  1. #51
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 03:11 PM
    Posts
    11,261
    Wasabi, you really are quite interesting in that its a miracle you can still seemingly function as a human being, more or less, yet remain so manifestly and profoundly stupid.

    One wonders what it is you do with your other brain cell.

  2. #52
    Hiso member
    buriramboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    8,446
    Poor old SeekingAss trapped in Pattaya unable to get his wingman a settlement visa for the UK. But I thought you claimed not to be British anyway. For someone who claims not to be British you do seem to care an awful lot about UK immigration policy.

  3. #53
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 03:11 PM
    Posts
    11,261
    Err, she has residence there already.

    You really do miss the point about most things in life unless of course it affects your wallet, your cock or whichever object into which you may wish to insert it.

    Why you simply do not confine yourself to that Pattaya Addicts forum where they know you well and you fit in so easily, is really quite mystifying.

  4. #54
    Hiso member
    buriramboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Err, she has residence there already.

    You really do miss the point about most things in life unless of course it affects your wallet, your cock or whichever object into which you may wish to insert it.

    Why you simply do not confine yourself to that Pattaya Addicts forum where they know you well and you fit in so easily, is really quite mystifying.
    WTF does she has residence there already mean? You deluded fukwit, you're trapped in Pattaya and don't meet the criteria to get her a settlement visa. I would probably empathise if it was anyone else but you just deserve to be laughed at.

  5. #55
    Thailand Expat
    Digby Fantona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 01:51 AM
    Posts
    1,080
    Quote Originally Posted by buriramboy
    WTF does she has residence there already mean? You deluded fukwit, you're trapped in Pattaya and don't meet the criteria to get her a settlement visa. I would probably empathise if it was anyone else but you just deserve to be laughed at.
    People are granted residency before they are allowed to apply for citizenship. On this occasion Mr Asylum is almost certainly correct. He is a bit of a "cheap Charlie" as he seems to have stopped short of getting the wingman her British citizenship.

    I went the extra mile and my family have dual nationality.

  6. #56
    Thailand Expat
    wasabi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:24 PM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    10,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Wasabi, you really are quite interesting in that its a miracle you can still seemingly function as a human being, more or less, yet remain so manifestly and profoundly stupid.

    One wonders what it is you do with your other brain cell.
    I'm interested in the human brain and how it functions so I listened twice over to this weeks BBC radio 4 Book of the week, it was about the experiences of a brain surgeon working for the NHS.
    Most of its about brain tumours and how they can alter the personality of the person, slowly over a long period of time.
    Some posters here have noticed that since the almighty Brexit win you seem to be changing.

  7. #57
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 03:11 PM
    Posts
    11,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Digby Fantona View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by buriramboy
    WTF does she has residence there already mean? You deluded fukwit, you're trapped in Pattaya and don't meet the criteria to get her a settlement visa. I would probably empathise if it was anyone else but you just deserve to be laughed at.
    People are granted residency before they are allowed to apply for citizenship. On this occasion Mr Asylum is almost certainly correct. He is a bit of a "cheap Charlie" as he seems to have stopped short of getting the wingman her British citizenship.

    I went the extra mile and my family have dual nationality.
    Half human and half Welsh, eh?

  8. #58
    Thailand Expat
    wasabi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:24 PM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    10,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Digby Fantona View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by buriramboy
    WTF does she has residence there already mean? You deluded fukwit, you're trapped in Pattaya and don't meet the criteria to get her a settlement visa. I would probably empathise if it was anyone else but you just deserve to be laughed at.
    People are granted residency before they are allowed to apply for citizenship. On this occasion Mr Asylum is almost certainly correct. He is a bit of a "cheap Charlie" as he seems to have stopped short of getting the wingman her British citizenship.

    I went the extra mile and my family have dual nationality.
    The visa My Mary had and was useing to reside in the U.K. was "Indefinite leave to remain " before she jumped through all the hoops to gain British citizenship and passport.
    Now do we need to repeat on here once again that if you leave the U.K. For a long time, the visa becomes redundant.
    And all the hoops have to be jumped all over again.
    Not that SA is in this position, a man of his profound knowledge would not be trapped abroad by such foolishness.

  9. #59
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 03:11 PM
    Posts
    11,261
    Quote Originally Posted by buriramboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Err, she has residence there already.

    You really do miss the point about most things in life unless of course it affects your wallet, your cock or whichever object into which you may wish to insert it.

    Why you simply do not confine yourself to that Pattaya Addicts forum where they know you well and you fit in so easily, is really quite mystifying.
    WTF does she has residence there already mean? You deluded fukwit, you're trapped in Pattaya and don't meet the criteria to get her a settlement visa. I would probably empathise if it was anyone else but you just deserve to be laughed at.
    Are you more comfortable in fucking Slovakian, you gormless oik.

    And, once we Brexit from shithole Britain, she can go and work, live and languish anywhere in Europe which is something you and your squaw won't be able to do, you ghastly little runty turdling.

  10. #60
    Thailand Expat
    Digby Fantona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 01:51 AM
    Posts
    1,080
    Permit residency is just that and cannot be lost by leaving the country. In exceptional circumstances it may be revoked by the Home Secretary.

  11. #61
    Hiso member
    buriramboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    8,446
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by buriramboy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Err, she has residence there already.

    You really do miss the point about most things in life unless of course it affects your wallet, your cock or whichever object into which you may wish to insert it.

    Why you simply do not confine yourself to that Pattaya Addicts forum where they know you well and you fit in so easily, is really quite mystifying.
    WTF does she has residence there already mean? You deluded fukwit, you're trapped in Pattaya and don't meet the criteria to get her a settlement visa. I would probably empathise if it was anyone else but you just deserve to be laughed at.
    Are you more comfortable in fucking Slovakian, you gormless oik.

    And, once we Brexit from shithole Britain, she can go and work, live and languish anywhere in Europe which is something you and your squaw won't be able to do, you ghastly little runty turdling.
    I'm sure she could do lots of things but she won't as she's stuck in Pattaya with you and no way out. And you'll still be living in Pattaya after Brexit not Europe however much you may like to fantasize.
    Independence day - June 23 for Brits.

  12. #62
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Location
    Mandalay
    Posts
    528
    Back to the Tory Scum! May wants to scrap school meals? Bitch.
    So, MPs can claim for free food but children will not be given lunch? Starting to think that MP actually stands for Massive Parasite. You know what you do with parasites? Purge them.

  13. #63
    Hiso member
    buriramboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    8,446
    They are not free school meals as someone has to pay for them, and why the fuk should the state be picking up the tab for feeding everyone's children, it's the job of parents.

  14. #64
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Location
    Mandalay
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by buriramboy
    They are not free school meals as someone has to pay for them, and why the fuk should the state be picking up the tab for feeding everyone's children, it's the job of parents.
    I'd rather taxes go to feeding children instead of feeding MPs who can certainly afford it. The expense accounts for all politicians make the mind boggle.Bunch of scroungers the lot of them. Chuck them in the clink with hard labor(Blair may like the pun) imo.

  15. #65
    Thailand Expat
    Wasp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last Online
    12-09-2017 @ 03:44 AM
    Posts
    2,022
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    I wouldn't wish to piss on his parade but there is the FLTR application in two and half years time and then the ILR application by which time the fees will have increased five times. Together with the Brit.Cit. naturalisation to come, assuming of course she manages the inexorably increasing demand for ever greater proficiency in English, I think your friend should budget for at least another 6-8,000.

    The extortionate fees and cruel language test are all to assist in the applicant's integration, apparently, because if you make it fucking difficult then it's easier somehow.

    Toryness.
    Have you seen the ludicrous " Life in the UK " questions .

    Which of these forts were part of Hadrian's Wall?
    (Choose any 2 answers)
    Housesteads
    Skara Brae
    Sutton Hoo
    Vindolanda

    Now how is that in any way relevant in anybody's life ?
    Stand outside ASDA and ask everybody that question and everybody will fail and presumably need to leave the country !!!!


    King Richard III of the House of York was killed in the Battle of Bosworth Field in
    1485
    1490
    1495
    1498 ....................... ???


    Which Act abolished slavery throughout the British Empire ?

    The Abolition Act
    The Emancipation Act
    The Freedom Act
    The Slavery Act

    Of course everybody in Primark knows that one hey ?

    The United Nations aims to ...........(Choose any 2 answers)

    work together towards shared goals in democracy
    prevent war
    promote international peace and security
    work together towards shared goals in development


    Life in the UK hey ?


    Wasp

  16. #66
    Member cdnski12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    25-09-2017 @ 02:08 AM
    Location
    Trail, BC, Canada
    Posts
    276
    Presumeably this political action is designed to stop the ingress of unwanted relatives of Welfare Consuming "Refugees" especially those of the Islamic Faith; who inundate the UK and make bogus claims to welfare funds, housing & education.

  17. #67
    Thailand Expat
    khmen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 08:04 PM
    Location
    Discombobulated
    Posts
    2,436
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Some of you may have picked up in the British media that the Tory election manifesto contains a pledge that the minimum financial requirement threshold will be raised from its current 18,600 annual income to an as yet unspecified amount.

    The threshold is already the highest in the developed world which together with the extortionate application fees imposed as a result of May's policies in the Home Office make Britain the worst destination for citizens who have the effrontery to marry other than within their own nationality.

    To put this into some perspective, some 42% of all British working males and 52% of women would not qualify currently for sponsorship of their foreign spouse in any settlement visa application to the UK.

    With the promised increase these figures can only rise dramatically together with the angst likely to ensue. At present, it is estimated that up to 15,000 children are reduced to electronic means in order to maintain contact with a mother or father separated by May's policies.

    This draconian measure is quite disgraceful but typical of the evil created by the monstrous, desiccated and barren bitch May.

    Hundreds of British citizens of all ages are discovering for themselves just how nasty and mean-minded these policies truly are, particularly the manner in which they are imposed.

    A few examples of just how fucked up they are:-

    -no account of any property ownership is taken when weighing the application. If the sponsor has an income of less than 18,600 but owns his own home in which they propose to live and therefore will subsist rent-free, then tough shit, you are refused.

    - no account of any potential earnings of one's spouse can be taken in the initial application. She/he is a chef, trained carpenter, qualified carer or arc welder, sorry, fuck you.

    - you have assets of cash savings held in secure bonds but not immediately liquid, then fuck you, you're refused, only cash held in wholly accessible accounts for the past six months count.

    - you have savings of 16,000 which you propose to use to make up for any shortfall in meeting the income requirement. Sorry, fuck you, only savings in excess of 16,000 can be counted because in order that the cvunt May can be satisfied you will not seek benefits you have to have that amount in the bank which excludes you from qualification for most benefits.

    - any employment the sponsor may have in the UK must have been held by them for at least six months prior to any settlement application being lodged. You want your family with you when you return to the UK and start your new job? Sorry, fuck you. Suck up the separation and enjoy it. Hey, why can't you just use Skype like all the other fuckers. You think you are something special?

    In practice, many folk who for whatever reason may wish to return to the UK with their families or other loved ones are going to experience ever greater difficulties in negotiating the minefield May has laid for them. And for what purpose?

    Hitting foreigners is always a vote catcher for the Tory right wing trash pandering to the lower end British. Fuck 'em.

    Anyway, the point of the post is to act as a warning - if you are thinking of sponsoring a partner's settlement, do it now and do not delay.
    I'd have had an elitist, snobbish, sneering, condescending motherfucker such as yourself down as a nailed on Tory.

    Your derogatory prattlings concerned with class, station, and superiority absolutely reek of self-obaessed, "I'm alright Jack" Tory voter - so why on earth you seem so concerned over this particular policy is baffling. Maybe as it affects you personally?

    Typical tory scum - Bollocks to the disabled on benefits who've had their support cut, bollocks to the old people struggling to heat their homes having their fuel allowance cut, bollocks to the kids on free school meals having them stopped - a policy is negatively affecting me so now I give a shit.

  18. #68
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    13,417
    to the disabled on benefits
    if the benefit cuts help to reduce the number of sanctimonious, self entitled, disgustingly obese, grotesque, angry faced foul mouthed white trash, many under 40 years of age, racing around the pavements of britain wreathed in cigarette smoke on their benefit funded mobility carts as they rush to poundland and aldi to stock up on booze, crisps and cigs, then bring it on.

    why on earth give these wheezy fat fucks mobility carts, they should be made to walk and exercise.

    the old people struggling to heat their homes having their fuel allowance cut,
    before complaining about having their fuel allowance stopped these parasites should consider getting rid of their 30 a month virgin media package along with their 400 i-phones.

    a life of fecklessness "living for the minute" with no thought about the future, spending every penny on useless shite and then expecting the state to look after them.

    fuckers.

  19. #69
    PAG
    PAG is offline
    Thailand Expat
    PAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:55 PM
    Location
    Chalong, Phuket
    Posts
    1,394
    Quote Originally Posted by khmen View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Some of you may have picked up in the British media that the Tory election manifesto contains a pledge that the minimum financial requirement threshold will be raised from its current 18,600 annual income to an as yet unspecified amount.

    The threshold is already the highest in the developed world which together with the extortionate application fees imposed as a result of May's policies in the Home Office make Britain the worst destination for citizens who have the effrontery to marry other than within their own nationality.

    To put this into some perspective, some 42% of all British working males and 52% of women would not qualify currently for sponsorship of their foreign spouse in any settlement visa application to the UK.

    With the promised increase these figures can only rise dramatically together with the angst likely to ensue. At present, it is estimated that up to 15,000 children are reduced to electronic means in order to maintain contact with a mother or father separated by May's policies.

    This draconian measure is quite disgraceful but typical of the evil created by the monstrous, desiccated and barren bitch May.

    Hundreds of British citizens of all ages are discovering for themselves just how nasty and mean-minded these policies truly are, particularly the manner in which they are imposed.

    A few examples of just how fucked up they are:-

    -no account of any property ownership is taken when weighing the application. If the sponsor has an income of less than 18,600 but owns his own home in which they propose to live and therefore will subsist rent-free, then tough shit, you are refused.

    - no account of any potential earnings of one's spouse can be taken in the initial application. She/he is a chef, trained carpenter, qualified carer or arc welder, sorry, fuck you.

    - you have assets of cash savings held in secure bonds but not immediately liquid, then fuck you, you're refused, only cash held in wholly accessible accounts for the past six months count.

    - you have savings of 16,000 which you propose to use to make up for any shortfall in meeting the income requirement. Sorry, fuck you, only savings in excess of 16,000 can be counted because in order that the cvunt May can be satisfied you will not seek benefits you have to have that amount in the bank which excludes you from qualification for most benefits.

    - any employment the sponsor may have in the UK must have been held by them for at least six months prior to any settlement application being lodged. You want your family with you when you return to the UK and start your new job? Sorry, fuck you. Suck up the separation and enjoy it. Hey, why can't you just use Skype like all the other fuckers. You think you are something special?

    In practice, many folk who for whatever reason may wish to return to the UK with their families or other loved ones are going to experience ever greater difficulties in negotiating the minefield May has laid for them. And for what purpose?

    Hitting foreigners is always a vote catcher for the Tory right wing trash pandering to the lower end British. Fuck 'em.

    Anyway, the point of the post is to act as a warning - if you are thinking of sponsoring a partner's settlement, do it now and do not delay.
    I'd have had an elitist, snobbish, sneering, condescending motherfucker such as yourself down as a nailed on Tory.

    Your derogatory prattlings concerned with class, station, and superiority absolutely reek of self-obaessed, "I'm alright Jack" Tory voter - so why on earth you seem so concerned over this particular policy is baffling. Maybe as it affects you personally?

    Typical tory scum - Bollocks to the disabled on benefits who've had their support cut, bollocks to the old people struggling to heat their homes having their fuel allowance cut, bollocks to the kids on free school meals having them stopped - a policy is negatively affecting me so now I give a shit.

    As I understand it, the Winter Fuel Allowance is going to have a cap which will be income related, with the net result that people who don't need it, don't get it. Those who do, will.

    Free school lunches for Primary school children is being replace by free school breakfasts.

    Neither of these seem to me to be unreasonable.

    Ultimately, if we want sufficient funding for health, welfare and education, the money has to come from savings, unless the Government goes the Labour route of more borrowing and higher taxation.

    Recently, during a visit to Abingdon in Oxfordshire, May was confronted by an angry lady protesting about her welfare benefit cuts. Subsequently interviewed by a reporter and asked what her disability was, this particular lady had 'learning difficulties'. She also said that her benefit was now so low she had to resort to the occasional visit to food banks. You should see the size of her, has to be 150 kg at least.

  20. #70
    Thailand Expat
    taxexile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    13,417
    i saw that interview, the angry lady was in fact sharp as a button and seemed more than capable of arguing her point with may.

    it seems she has been convinced by the authorities that she has one or more of the many recently discovered terrifying mental disabilities that render their unfortunate victims unable to do anything other than eat crisps, smoke cigarettes and bleat loudly for assistance from the state.

  21. #71
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 03:11 PM
    Posts
    11,261
    Indeed, how dare they presume to divert valuable resources from the socialisation of the bank debt and to undermine the introduction of the lowest corporate tax regime in fucking living memory.

    Heaven forbid anything should detract from the Tory trough of plenty for their masters and serfs.

    The British have to be the dumbest electorate on the planet.

    The average Joe will have paid around 40% of his annual income in taxes and NI contributions funding his state pension allowance and the provision of health but after all these years he is still receiving the worst social and health care in the developed world and the worst state pension allowance.

    Europe leads Britain in almost every index but of course, according to the deluded and cretinous, the EU is on the point of collapse and when it does Britain will once again be the bestest country in the whole wide world for everything.

    You guys are surely the dumbest mofos in mofoland - the fucking niggers of Europe and soon to be corralled on your own fucking island of economic despair and fucked-upness.

  22. #72
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 03:11 PM
    Posts
    11,261
    Quote Originally Posted by khmen View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    Some of you may have picked up in the British media that the Tory election manifesto contains a pledge that the minimum financial requirement threshold will be raised from its current 18,600 annual income to an as yet unspecified amount.

    The threshold is already the highest in the developed world which together with the extortionate application fees imposed as a result of May's policies in the Home Office make Britain the worst destination for citizens who have the effrontery to marry other than within their own nationality.

    To put this into some perspective, some 42% of all British working males and 52% of women would not qualify currently for sponsorship of their foreign spouse in any settlement visa application to the UK.

    With the promised increase these figures can only rise dramatically together with the angst likely to ensue. At present, it is estimated that up to 15,000 children are reduced to electronic means in order to maintain contact with a mother or father separated by May's policies.

    This draconian measure is quite disgraceful but typical of the evil created by the monstrous, desiccated and barren bitch May.

    Hundreds of British citizens of all ages are discovering for themselves just how nasty and mean-minded these policies truly are, particularly the manner in which they are imposed.

    A few examples of just how fucked up they are:-

    -no account of any property ownership is taken when weighing the application. If the sponsor has an income of less than 18,600 but owns his own home in which they propose to live and therefore will subsist rent-free, then tough shit, you are refused.

    - no account of any potential earnings of one's spouse can be taken in the initial application. She/he is a chef, trained carpenter, qualified carer or arc welder, sorry, fuck you.

    - you have assets of cash savings held in secure bonds but not immediately liquid, then fuck you, you're refused, only cash held in wholly accessible accounts for the past six months count.

    - you have savings of 16,000 which you propose to use to make up for any shortfall in meeting the income requirement. Sorry, fuck you, only savings in excess of 16,000 can be counted because in order that the cvunt May can be satisfied you will not seek benefits you have to have that amount in the bank which excludes you from qualification for most benefits.

    - any employment the sponsor may have in the UK must have been held by them for at least six months prior to any settlement application being lodged. You want your family with you when you return to the UK and start your new job? Sorry, fuck you. Suck up the separation and enjoy it. Hey, why can't you just use Skype like all the other fuckers. You think you are something special?

    In practice, many folk who for whatever reason may wish to return to the UK with their families or other loved ones are going to experience ever greater difficulties in negotiating the minefield May has laid for them. And for what purpose?

    Hitting foreigners is always a vote catcher for the Tory right wing trash pandering to the lower end British. Fuck 'em.

    Anyway, the point of the post is to act as a warning - if you are thinking of sponsoring a partner's settlement, do it now and do not delay.
    I'd have had an elitist, snobbish, sneering, condescending motherfucker such as yourself down as a nailed on Tory.

    Your derogatory prattlings concerned with class, station, and superiority absolutely reek of self-obaessed, "I'm alright Jack" Tory voter - so why on earth you seem so concerned over this particular policy is baffling. Maybe as it affects you personally?

    Typical tory scum - Bollocks to the disabled on benefits who've had their support cut, bollocks to the old people struggling to heat their homes having their fuel allowance cut, bollocks to the kids on free school meals having them stopped - a policy is negatively affecting me so now I give a shit.
    You are a young person and therefore you think like a fucking cartoon character in simplistic slogans, vacuous rhetoric and scarcely understood pseudo jargon. Your intellect is as diminished as the attention span of an adolescent solely communicating in txt-speak limited by their Twitter defined mentality.

    How on earth did you imagine for one nano second that a mental pygmy such as you could possibly understand anything more complex than taking a fucking selfie with your finger up your arse?

  23. #73
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    24-09-2017 @ 03:11 PM
    Posts
    11,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Wasp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Seekingasylum View Post
    I wouldn't wish to piss on his parade but there is the FLTR application in two and half years time and then the ILR application by which time the fees will have increased five times. Together with the Brit.Cit. naturalisation to come, assuming of course she manages the inexorably increasing demand for ever greater proficiency in English, I think your friend should budget for at least another 6-8,000.

    The extortionate fees and cruel language test are all to assist in the applicant's integration, apparently, because if you make it fucking difficult then it's easier somehow.

    Toryness.
    Have you seen the ludicrous " Life in the UK " questions .

    Which of these forts were part of Hadrian's Wall?
    (Choose any 2 answers)
    Housesteads
    Skara Brae
    Sutton Hoo
    Vindolanda

    Now how is that in any way relevant in anybody's life ?
    Stand outside ASDA and ask everybody that question and everybody will fail and presumably need to leave the country !!!!


    King Richard III of the House of York was killed in the Battle of Bosworth Field in
    1485
    1490
    1495
    1498 ....................... ???


    Which Act abolished slavery throughout the British Empire ?

    The Abolition Act
    The Emancipation Act
    The Freedom Act
    The Slavery Act

    Of course everybody in Primark knows that one hey ?

    The United Nations aims to ...........(Choose any 2 answers)

    work together towards shared goals in democracy
    prevent war
    promote international peace and security
    work together towards shared goals in development


    Life in the UK hey ?


    Wasp
    Well observed.

    It would have some legitimacy if the subject content to be tested was based on cultural hallmarks prevalent among current society but, as it is, only a retarded, malformed cvunt like Gove or the desiccated , barren May could support it.

    British cultural history is quite redundant and pretty much superseded by obsessions with faux celebrities, tattoos, alcohol, foreign holidays, the cost of housing, shopping and sexual deviance.

    If you asked any Brit under the age of 30 who Churchill was they would think of the fucking dog for the insurance company.

    Still, the British do excel well in one notable area, they do like to fuck little children and probably fiddle with them more than any other developed country on the planet.

  24. #74
    Suspended from News & Speakers Corner
    Chico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    23-09-2017 @ 07:13 AM
    Location
    I'm Dead
    Posts
    2,606
    Totally agree though I'd say that for parents to be able to feed there kids the Tories should get rid of Zero hour contracts,as those food banks seem to becoming a normal lifestyle fr many.

    Anyway after been a labour supporter for the majority of my life,
    I presonally feel safer with the Tories in Govt.

    Corbyn and co need to fuk right off with their lunacy.

    Quote Originally Posted by buriramboy View Post
    They are not free school meals as someone has to pay for them, and why the fuk should the state be picking up the tab for feeding everyone's children, it's the job of parents.

  25. #75
    Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Location
    Mandalay
    Posts
    528
    Why on earth do they want to bring the ivory trade back? Looks like we are going back a little further than the 70s!

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •