^ The retard has never posted one fact or figure. He is a clown.
NOAA November 2016 numbers (5th warmest November and 2016 warmest year to date),...
As previously reported, Arctic sea ice cover was lower in November 2016 than any other November in the satellite record. It turns out that the Arctic was not alone. Sea ice at the other pole, around Antarctica, also reached a record November low.
The melt season started early this year, after Antarctic sea ice reached its annual maximum extent on August 31. By November, the ice reached daily record lows amid air temperatures that were 2 to 4 degrees Celsius (4 to 7 Fahrenheit) above average. Winds that usually disperse the ice instead shifted direction and compressed it around various land areas.
Climate change will stir 'unimaginable' refugee crisis, says military
Unchecked global warming is greatest threat to 21st-century security where mass migration could be ‘new normal’, say senior military
Climate change is set to cause a refugee crisis of “unimaginable scale”, according to senior military figures, who warn that global warming is the greatest security threat of the 21st century and that mass migration will become the “new normal”.
The generals said the impacts of climate change were already factors in the conflicts driving a current crisis of migration into Europe, having been linked to the Arab Spring, the war in Syria and the Boko Haram terrorist insurgency.
Military leaders have long warned that global warming could multiply and accelerate security threats around the world by provoking conflicts and migration. They are now warning that immediate action is required.
“Climate change is the greatest security threat of the 21st century,” said Maj Gen Munir Muniruzzaman, chairman of the Global Military Advisory Council on climate change and a former military adviser to the president of Bangladesh. He said one metre of sea level rise will flood 20% of his nation. “We’re going to see refugee problems on an unimaginable scale, potentially above 30 million people.”
“Countries are going to pay for climate change one way or another,” said Cheney. “The best way to pay for it is by tackling the root causes of climate change and cutting greenhouse gas emissions. If we do not, the national security impacts will be increasingly costly and challenging.”
A closer look at one example country (not the highest taker on the list) to see who these industries/companies might be.
Looking above, the companies/industries I have circled don’t look like the companies/industries that green left wing groups would support. In fact I know environmentalists support another type of action to show their disapproval of the companies I have circled.
Maybe I should threaten to bring this up every week until pulvarien admits he misled everyone about the article he referenced.
Last edited by S Landreth; 19-12-2016 at 11:49 PM.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
So why aren't the global leaders talking; bicycle mandates and eight food crop rotation?
That would solve much of the problem.
I suppose the global alarmist fuckwits prefer to blow hot air than actually address the problems.
Its all crap out of their green controlled organizations, and soon many of them will disappear and eventually news will come out of how they falsified everything, and these reports will come out over and over and over. And they will be scientifically backed up and then we shall see.
Even a moron like you might question why, with the amount of money Exxon and the like have poured into it Climate Change denial, that they could have come up with at least *some* science by now.
Oh.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-40-years-ago/Exxon Knew about Climate Change almost 40 years ago
A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformation
<snip>
...the company’s knowledge of climate change dates back to July 1977, when its senior scientist James Black delivered a sobering message on the topic. “In the first place, there is general scientific agreement that the most likely manner in which mankind is influencing the global climate is through carbon dioxide release from the burning of fossil fuels," Black told Exxon’s management committee.
Because this thread started with a couple articles related to Michael Mann’s work,…….
The opinion, written for the three judge panel by Senior Judge Vanessa Ruiz, states:
To the extent statements in appellants’ articles take issue with the soundness of Dr. Mann’s methodology and conclusions — i.e., with ideas in a scientific or political debate — they are protected by the First Amendment. But defamatory statements that are personal attacks on an individual’s honesty and integrity and assert or imply as fact that Dr. Mann engaged in professional misconduct and deceit to manufacture the results he desired, if false, do not enjoy constitutional protection and may be actionable.
The court's majority opinion also found that making statements to gain advantage in a "no-holds-barred debate over global warming" are typically protected under the First Amendment. However:
... If the statements assert or imply false facts that defame the individual, they do not find shelter under the First Amendment simply because they are embedded in a larger policy debate.
Court ruling provides new way for climate scientists to fight intimidation
In a legal first, a federal appeals court ruled on Thursday that a climate science researcher can proceed with defamation claims against writers who made false allegations about his scientific work.
The ruling by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, found that a "reasonable jury" could find that two writers defamed Michael Mann — known for the famous "hockey stick" graph showing that modern climate change is unprecedented in human history — by making false claims about his work, and comparing him to a notorious child molester.
The court found that two writers for the National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, may have defamed Mann by comparing him to Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky, who was convicted of molesting dozens of children in 2012.
Mann has been the subject of extraordinary criticism since his research was used as part of the foundation of a 2001 climate science report that found that human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases are the most likely cause of global warming.
Mann said he is "pleased" with the decision, and looking forward to moving on to a jury trial.
"We are particularly pleased that the court, after performing an independent review of the evidence, found that the allegations against me have been 'definitively discredited,'" he said in a statement.
__________
Michael Mann - “Denial will never be completely dead.,…..There’s still people who think the moon landing was a hoax.”
__________
The Arctic could end a year of record-breaking temperatures with a heat wave
Another sign that not all is well in the Arctic.
In a year of record-high temperatures and record-low sea ice, the Arctic appears poised to witness another frightening scenario: temperatures at the North Pole so high that they might even swing above freezing, something not typically seen until May.
For the second year in a row, December temperatures in the Arctic are much higher than normal. On Thursday, it’s possible that temperatures could climb as much as 50° F (about 28° C) above normal, bringing temperatures close to, or potentially above, 32° F.
Record-low levels of Arctic sea ice might be at least partly responsible for the high temperatures. Ryan Maue, a meteorologist with WeatherBell Analytics, told the Washington Post that the temperatures are being brought to the North Pole by a storm east of Greenland, and that record-low sea ice makes it easier for warm air to travel northward unencumbered.
Since roughly September, the Arctic has experienced much warmer than normal temperatures — November was a record 18 degrees above normal, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s annual arctic report card, released December 13, surface air temperatures for the Arctic this year have been “by far” the highest since 1900.
Last edited by S Landreth; 23-12-2016 at 04:12 AM.
I see the Sahara is even suffering the devastating effects of climate change as snow falls for the first time in 37 years. Was it man made snow?
^ Jeezus you are about an epic level of stupid. Go back and read through this thread clearly you missed something. Fucking stupid people.
I've missed nothing it's quite clear that man made climate change is a religion followed by nutters like yourself as opposed to science. But then again easily led people of low intellect such as your self believe in all sorts of weird shit these days so if you want to believe climate change is man made and man can alter the climate then you carry on.
^ You are one of the biggest buffoons on this forum. So you really think you can flip the narrative and claim as a denier the very science you reject is somehow on your side?
Perhaps you can name these scientists and their research?
I doubt that since you have never posted one fact or figure to back any of your tin foiled bullshit.
There are a great many very good reasons to reduce CO emissions.
Sadly climate change/global warming isn't one of them.
This whole alarmist movement is distraction from the real emergency facing the planet; the human virus!
^ I feel sorry for ya snubhy, Seatle weather must really suck right now.
Thailand, a rather delightful 25 celcius. Great for cycling and muffdiving..
^ lots of snow in the mountains. Nice powder if timed right. My time of the year for snowboarding. Nothing like a beer and a fat bowl on the top of alpental.
^ I grew up on skis. I prefer to carve the mountain on a board. Way more in tune with nature bra.
Who is flipping the narrative, you believe climate change is man made and man can change the climate which is all a hoax / scam that has been going on for years with no science to back it up. As I said it's just another cult for easily a led low intellect suckers. Climate change is cyclical as history proves.
Cult or religion which is the best fit.
You are.Originally Posted by buriramboy
Are you mentally ill? Like I said before if science is on your side (it's not) then post up your facts, name your scientists. You can't because you are a denialist heretic you make shit up as you go along. This thread is packed full of science and data. You have posted none of it.Originally Posted by buriramboy
Good god you are a brainless retardOriginally Posted by buriramboy
Umm no its not.Originally Posted by buriramboy
No one denies climate change, what people deny is that it is man made and man can change the climate. That it is man made is a scam that lots of people have made money from and continue to do so because of fukwits like yourself.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)