Thread: Brexit - It's Still On!

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Doris is the problem, the EU offered a free trade deal at the start of negotiations which she rejected. Canada + or Norway + or whatever they called it at the time forget which. That would probably have got through parliament back then but now she has dug in so deep with her clusterfuk deal and alienated everyone from all sides of the argument she needs to go, she needed to go last year.

It's not a deal, or hers, but a surrender Treaty owned by Fray Merkel; all May did was take dictation.

Originally Posted by jabir

Anyone know if May has the authority as PM to revoke A50 without consultation or support? If she does have the authority, I reckon she might well do it as her final act of betrayal before saying fcuk you and leaping into the EU (or UN) trough.

Would need an act of Parliament as already in law we leave so she couldn't just wake up this morning with a hangover from hell and decide to do it on her own.

fufu did you vote?

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Will do, the Brexit party could possibly win more seats than Merkels CDU making it the largest party in the Euro parliament. Obviously that becomes a bit irrelevant though when only 25 seats out of a 700 seat parliament but let's see how anti EU parties do across the whole of the EU and the make up of the next parliament could be quite interesting. Le Pen still leading in Frogsville?

LePen is crushing Macron, and with the round of bad news with brexit, ASCOVAL, British Steel not showing up at government meetings, Macron might go from 20% to 15% vote, while LePen is hedging toward 25% and possibly more. I think she will get 30% at the end. Can't wait for Sunday results.

Originally Posted by jabir

Anyone know if May has the authority as PM to revoke A50 without consultation or support? If she does have the authority, I reckon she might well do it as her final act of betrayal before saying fcuk you and leaping into the EU (or UN) trough.

I think she does have that authority actually, will she do it and create a complete political meltdown? don't think she would be that foolish, but again we underestimated her before

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

I think she does have that authority actually, will she do it and create a complete political meltdown? don't think she would be that foolish, but again we underestimated her before

Not sure about this, but I believe it could only be done with the collective responsibility of her cabinet.
The ones who are queueing up to turn on her and resign over ref 2.
No cabinet support, no authority. Wait and see.

she is the head of the cabinet, she can claim what she wants, they are civil servants, they will follow their boss to the ravin

apparently her plan was to call a ref2, hilarious, and a bit too late, she tangled herself in her own party contradictions

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

I think she does have that authority actually, will she do it and create a complete political meltdown? don't think she would be that foolish, but again we underestimated her before

I thought it was under her authority to do so, even before announcing it. If so, imho it's the best thing she could do, utterly savage the Tories with Labour also in meltdown, leaving scope for a definitive change in Brit politics.

That said, don't press me for who might do the honours or how it would pan out.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

she is the head of the cabinet, she can claim what she wants, they are civil servants, they will follow their boss to the ravin

apparently her plan was to call a ref2, hilarious, and a bit too late, she tangled herself in her own party contradictions

They are NOT civil servants, they are sitting MPs, one of whom, Andrea Leadsome, Leader of the Commons, resigned yesterday. Most of her senior ministers, all MPs, have asked to speak to her about WA 4 and especially the attempt to include a referendum if WA 4 passes. She refused.

They are likely to resign en masse, saving the 1922 Committee from rewriting the rules on deposing her. Without a cabinet, she cannot survive or lead.

To me the bloke makes sense;

PM May simply has to resign. Tomorrow she's due to give her resignation plans to the 1922 committee. It's 18 months too late, she needed to go when her visions of brexit were not shared.

Perhaps she is hoping for a miracle result from the EU elections. Given the way she clings to her Brexit Deal like a drunk hangs onto a lamp-post for support, nothing would surprise me.

I think they will have to drag her kicking and screaming out of No 10, demanding one last chance.

Originally Posted by jabir

a surrender Treaty owned by Fray Merkel; all May did was take dictation.

SOP, see the Greek Bailout fiasco.

2 votes just cast for the Brexit party, wife voted same as me who would have guessed!!!!!

Originally Posted by Switch

They are NOT civil servants, they are sitting MPs, one of whom, Andrea Leadsome, Leader of the Commons, resigned yesterday. Most of her senior ministers, all MPs, have asked to speak to her about WA 4 and especially the attempt to include a referendum if WA 4 passes. She refused.

They are likely to resign en masse, saving the 1922 Committee from rewriting the rules on deposing her. Without a cabinet, she cannot survive or lead.

interesting, cabinet members can accumulate their MPs seats? no longer possible in most democracies, can't have 2 seats, one executive and legislative. No wonder the situation is completely fucked, there is a huge conflict of interests in their roles.

France used to have that problem, and it has been removed because silly political party games were being played and sabotage the efforts of the cabinet if they were against party politics

A couple more votes cast for the Brexit party, why the fvck was the change party first on the ballot paper?


Anyone else vote today?

Landslide victory tomorrow. ...

we won't know until sunday

a landslide I hope, anything less 35% will be a loss!!!

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

we won't know until sunday

a landslide I hope, anything less 35% will be a loss!!!

All depends on turnout if a low turnout Brexit party should get about 35%, if a high turnout as in remoaners can be bothered to vote then maybe 30% for Brexit party, they will still win though which is quite an achievement for a party that's only bee active a few months.

it's not surprising, the world is going upside now, everyone wants something fresh, the Tory and Labor are the past, it seems you guys are having your Trump moment and will vote out the old party system

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Do you post anything that isn't made up FuFu?

It was confirmed by the Brexit Party spokesman ...you utterly delusional moron.

So you're saying the Brexit party made it up or would you like to now revise?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

interesting, cabinet members can accumulate their MPs seats? no longer possible in most democracies, can't have 2 seats, one executive and legislative. No wonder the situation is completely fucked, there is a huge conflict of interests in their roles.

France used to have that problem, and it has been removed because silly political party games were being played and sabotage the efforts of the cabinet if they were against party politics

Oh dear. Is there no subject that can fail to grasp and turn into complete nonsense? Thank you for demonstrating, yet again, what a complete and utter buffoon you are.
Life must be very difficult being as stupid and plotless as you are.

Originally Posted by Bettyboo

we will be forced to buy Chinese steel which is the most polluted in the world,

Chinese steel is even lower grade than steel made in Britain and no one is forcing you to buy it, buying it is a deliberate decision by the buyer and not something forced on him.
There is quality steel available in Europe as I said yesterday (forgetting to include the Finns).
Good luck with building your billion pound wind turbines with third-rate Chinese steel, I find it quite telling of the British view on quality.