1. #10051
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:48 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,340
    Barnier, in the Youtube link I added above, clearly says there will be no hard border in Ireland whatever the outcome of Brexit negotiations. CHECK

    and then... some nice and reasonable words about future cooperation... CHECK

    ...and then... "leaving the EU means leaving the customs union and single market" - very clear, as he has said repeatedly. CHECK

    [I have no idea why Labour keep saying otherwise, and that their plan (which seems to, even though they have never fleshed it out, include certainly the customs union and also perhaps the single market) they've talked to the EU about could/would work.]

    ...and then... "as President Tusk has said, Britain can still stay in the EU"... &, that seems to be what the House of Commons are working for.

    The leaving with no deal scenario on Friday means no hard border in Ireland, no inclusion in the single market, no inclusion in the customs union, but continued close partnership with the EU, and a start to working out a trade deal. The EU has already put extensive plans in place to help a smooth transition during this scenario.

    Brexit preparedness: EU completes preparations for possible “no-deal” scenario on 12
    http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-19-1813_en.htm



    ^ extensive details here.

    There is no reason not to leave; the problem is with the House of Commons.
    Cycling should be banned!!!

  2. #10052
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:48 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,340
    Always interesting listening to the House of Commons, and very much in Bobbie's thought on democracy, when asked if the government should adhere to their manifesto promises in the last election, the opposing benches simply said "No", it is the houses right to control the business... (obviously, these were folk who want to stop Brexit and stay in the EU)

    This sums up how the current mob of MPs fail to understand that a referendum must be respected.
    Last edited by Bettyboo; 27-03-2019 at 10:04 PM.

  3. #10053
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo View Post
    clearly says there will be no hard border in Ireland whatever the outcome of Brexit negotiations.
    That is really interesting. I think more details need to come out about how to keep an open border without a customs union but if it can be done and the backstop done away with the biggest stumbling block would be removed.

  4. #10054
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:48 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,340
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b View Post
    That is really interesting. I think more details need to come out about how to keep an open border without a customs union but if it can be done and the backstop done away with the biggest stumbling block would be removed.
    Indeed. The EU single market needs to be intact, and that takes checks, but in Barnier's words - no hard border.

    The Labour members are now (as I type this) demanding indicative votes on staying in the customs union and single market - the EU has been consistently clear, this is not possible. Labour are as pathetic as the Tories in the current House of Commons.

  5. #10055
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by NigelFarage View Post
    I see, so if UK politicians decide they want to make changes to the withdraw agreement after it failed to pass in the house of commons twice, to make it acceptable, the EU will reopen it and allow the UK to "rewrite and remove" the bits it doesn't like?
    I said Citizens Assemblies, not politicians rewriting. I also think citizens assemblies would have been the way forward here too. Too late now though.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo
    The Labour members are now (as I type this) demanding indicative votes on staying in the customs union and single market - the EU has been consistently clear, this is not possible. Labour are as pathetic as the Tories in the current House of Commons.
    I've seen the list of amendments and most of them are just variations on the same old stuff that's failed before. I don't know what Bercow will pick for votes but I have little confidence in any of them.
    The Above Post May Contain Strong Language, Flashing Lights, or Violent Scenes.

  6. #10056
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last Online
    16-07-2021 @ 10:31 PM
    Posts
    14,636
    Common Market is possible but you need the free movement thing,

    since racist Maybot is a fervent opponent to immigration and free movement, Common Market is out of the deal

    again too late to renegotiate all this,

  7. #10057
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last Online
    16-07-2021 @ 10:31 PM
    Posts
    14,636
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b View Post
    I said Citizens Assemblies, not politicians rewriting. I also think citizens assemblies would have been the way forward here too. Too late now though.



    I've seen the list of amendments and most of them are just variations on the same old stuff that's failed before. I don't know what Bercow will pick for votes but I have little confidence in any of them.
    there is simply no time for all that shit, why didn't they move their fat ugly ass and do something 2 months ago

  8. #10058
    RIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    16,939
    Options, options, good grief!

  9. #10059
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:30 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,936
    Watching MP debates on BBC. Just beginning but 2nd referendum seems to have support. Should be a highly entertaining day.

  10. #10060
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 08:30 PM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,936
    Quote Originally Posted by Chittychangchang View Post
    Options, options, good grief!
    I will nod off long before debates and votes are done but predict none of the above will prevail by end of the day.

  11. #10061
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:48 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,340
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b View Post
    I've seen the list of amendments and most of them are just variations on the same old stuff that's failed before. I don't know what Bercow will pick for votes but I have little confidence in any of them.
    The list has just come out:

    Speaker confirms what options will be on the ballot
    He has picked:
    Option B (Baron): Leave the EU without a deal on 12th April
    Option D (Boles): Norway + model (remain in single market, customs arrangement, EFTA)
    Option H (Eustice): Norway model, without a customs union (EEA + EFTA).
    Option J (Clarke): Leave the EU with a UK-wide customs union.
    Option K (Corbyn): Permanent customs union, including alignment with single market on future EU rights and regulations
    Option L (Cherry): Revoke Article 50 if no-deal Brexit is not explicitly approved by MPs a day before we are due to leave
    Option M (Beckett): Any withdrawal agreement must be put to the public in a ‘confirmatory’ second referendum
    Option O (Fysh): If no withdrawal agreement agreed, seek “standstill” agreement with the EU while negotiating trade deal


    D, H, J, K are simply not possible according to the EU - they have made this very clear.

    B is fine, but unlikely to pass with this groups of MPs.

    L revoke article 50 is simply suicide for MPs, and is a no go. Although, to try and avoid leaving on the 12th, I could imagine this terrible group of MPs to try to put Brexit in limbo forever...

    M 2nd referendum has already been turned down, so it's strange for the speaker to choose this. Soros has put his money on this, but I suspect that MPs are starting to realize the voting public will vote by even larger margins to leave - of course, if leave isn't actually on the ballot paper...

    O is a very weird one - what is a "standstill" agreement? &, the EU won't accept this; just another attempt by these MPs to avoid Brexit.

    These votes are for the most part just silly and a waste of time...


    The speaker couldn't help himself, he basically said there's a very good chance he will block the 3rd vote on May's deal, so even if Mogg and his lot wanted to help May get her deal through, it probably won't be allowed by the speaker.
    Last edited by Bettyboo; 27-03-2019 at 10:45 PM.

  12. #10062
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last Online
    16-07-2021 @ 10:31 PM
    Posts
    14,636
    agree, completely waste of time

    obviously the problem reside with Maybot and Parliament, all this should have been resolved with a new REF2 long ago

    game over people, hard brexit here we come

  13. #10063
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by NigelFarage View Post
    Very few countries in the world freely open their doors to a population eight times bigger than them. That doesn't make them racist.
    I can think of 27 that do something similar. May was racist before Brexit, her appalling record at the Home Office showed that.

  14. #10064
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:48 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,340
    Labour, after much discussion about democracy, the rights of individual MPs to have their say, etc, are using the whip - even though, as I stated above, the 3 ammendments they've mentioned are not acceptable by the EU. Idiots...

    Starmer taking over again; does Corbyn still pretend to be the leader or has Starmer taken over completely yet?

  15. #10065
    Thailand Expat
    rebbu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    2,510
    Brexit - It's Still On!-fararge-young-gammon-jpg
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Brexit - It's Still On!-fararge-young-gammon-jpg  

  16. #10066
    Thailand Expat jabir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,009
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettyboo View Post
    Always interesting listening to the House of Commons, and very much in Bobbie's thought on democracy, when asked if the government should adhere to their manifesto promises in the last election, the opposing benches simply said "No", it is the houses right to control the business... (obviously, these were folk who want to stop Brexit and stay in the EU)

    This sums up how the current mob of MPs fail to understand that a referendum must be respected.
    House legislates, government governs; when they get this mixed up it leads to trouble, though in the current mess that trouble might well go unnoticed.

    Ref1 was gov policy made lawful by the House; the two main parts of the Crown joined to make and legislate policy. Then it is law and must be respected, cannot be overturned on the whim of either but can be if they collude, with or without the Lords.

    Would take some serious manipulation and kevlar undies, but if they do collude it could well be to revoke A50 under that 'honest' approach I mentioned in an earlier post. Otoh it could also be a more typical sneaky 3am tiptoe through the shadows.

  17. #10067
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:48 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,340
    ^ you're absolutely right, and that is what they're trying to do.

    Repeatedly, the strongest remoaners are stating that they will support half a dozen different motions as a "failsafe" - actually, they are doing everything they can to stop democratic process, hoping that Brexit will just disappear if they block it for long enough.

    Clarke trying to press revoke article 50... He has zero concern for the populous or the trouble it'd cause. If the country is upset now, see what happens if parliament revokes article 50 and stays in.

    These MPs are so sneaky, Clarke never mentioned once how the EU have stated time and time again that we cannot stay in the customs union and single market without free movement of people.

    SNP trying to revoke article 50; there's a shock.

    This is just going over the same stuff over and over again - the MPs on all sides are blaming everyone else for not compromising, but none of them are compromising themselves or adhering to the British people's vote. They are all intransient.

  18. #10068
    Member
    Bettyboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:48 PM
    Location
    Bangkok
    Posts
    34,340
    *** Friday: the government will bring their vote for a third time. ***

  19. #10069
    Thailand Expat jabir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,009
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b View Post
    That is really interesting. I think more details need to come out about how to keep an open border without a customs union but if it can be done and the backstop done away with the biggest stumbling block would be removed.
    The daft bit has always been that heads of Ireland, EU and UK agreed several times there are no circumstances under which Ireland could have a hard border, EU's own study confirmed it is not viable to have a hard border, yet EU rules demand a hard border between EU and non-EU. Verhofstadt wasn't a happy bunny when Mogg wrapped him up in the rules vs rules exchange.

    Frau had better come up with something, and soon.

  20. #10070
    Thailand Expat jabir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,009
    Quote Originally Posted by NigelFarage View Post
    I see, so if UK politicians decide they want to make changes to the withdraw agreement after it failed to pass in the house of commons twice, to make it acceptable, the EU will reopen it and allow the UK to "rewrite and remove" the bits it doesn't like?

    The changes made before the second Irish referendum were important to prove to the Irish than Lisbon wouldn't diminish sovereignty, but the main reason for the yes vote was the economic crash that wasn't so dramatic at the time of the first vote. The yes campaign used it to say that a yes vote would secure jobs, but that was nonsense as the EU has done nothing about youth employment in the worst affected states.

    I'm sure that if the UK had been allowed referendums on Maastricht and Lisbon we wouldn't now be where we are.
    Wasn't it also Denmark and Netherlands that voted the wrong way only to be circumvented?

    I suspect as you said in the chamber not long ago, the game is up and people are getting wise to not just the EU but also those of their leaders that wish to keep them shackled.

  21. #10071
    Thailand Expat jabir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,009
    Quote Originally Posted by Norton View Post
    Watching MP debates on BBC. Just beginning but 2nd referendum seems to have support. Should be a highly entertaining day.
    Right now I go for a longer extension, but that could change in ten minutes.

  22. #10072
    Thailand Expat jabir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,009
    Quote Originally Posted by NigelFarage View Post
    The EU won't accept it, but it doesn't have a good reason not to other than it puts it on the back foot. It needs the current state of unknown.
    Can't decide if they're playing chess where the better side wins, or poker, or worse, dice.

  23. #10073
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by NigelFarage View Post
    Britain does nothing to protect its citizens from having to compete for jobs with hundreds of millions of English-speaking Europeans, because it's the CBI's dream situation.
    Because protectionism stopped working in the 1980s and is now totally unacceptable to business. If you think your country gives a fuck about you you're in for a lifetime of disappointment. Starting with Thatcher Britain was turned into a corporate state, run against all sense and against all idea of what a country is as if a nation were a profit making business. If you didn't protest against it you have no right to bitch about it now.

  24. #10074
    Thailand Expat jabir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,009
    Quote Originally Posted by DrB0b View Post
    I can think of 27 that do something similar. May was racist before Brexit, her appalling record at the Home Office showed that.
    Which 27, after deductions?

  25. #10075
    R.I.P.
    DrB0b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
    Posts
    17,118
    Quote Originally Posted by NigelFarage View Post
    It's a problem of the EU's making
    And yet despite the most fervent wishes of the Brexiters the EU doesn't actually have any major problems. Step outside the echo-chamber and you'll see that despite all current problems the EU is still massively popular across Europe.

Page 403 of 901 FirstFirst ... 303353393395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411413453503 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •