Thread: Brexit - It's Still On!

Originally Posted by jabir

"Maybe" my aunt had balls.

Should be easy enough to understand that vehicles and personnel sport the insignia they represent. Should be, but isn't always, right?

If the EU flag is stuck on a vbrg or apc or tank or plane then that vehicle represents the EU; if tomorrow the same vehicle is doing NATO work then the symbol would be changed overnight to represent that.

Unless it is photoshopped or you can provide a less implausible 'maybe' that vbrg is EU, so stop being so defensive and risk accepting certain realities.

]

Whatever are you taking? Butter's confirmed in the post below mine the EU peacekeeping force it had likely been assigned to and Kosovo was one of those assignments. Maybe was simply because it could have returned from a trip to Africa but that's not so likely.

The fact is it is a French made vehicle being used in France not a fooking Tiger tank issuing yellow vests to cause a fooking uprising.

You are reading too much into a vehicle hurriedly pulled out of moth balls for use in the streets of France

BTW why is everyone so concerned about having an EU army anyway? Surely it has benefits for the EU, many countries of which see being a member from a different viewpoint to the UK. It has United Europe in a way it has not been United before and a multi national army may unite foreign policy as well as keeping the peace within.

^Are you on the Brussels payroll?

Originally Posted by Troy

]

Whatever are you taking? Butter's confirmed in the post below mine the EU peacekeeping force it had likely been assigned to and Kosovo was one of those assignments. Maybe was simply because it could have returned from a trip to Africa but that's not so likely.

The fact is it is a French made vehicle being used in France not a fooking Tiger tank issuing yellow vests to cause a fooking uprising.

You are reading too much into a vehicle hurriedly pulled out of moth balls for use in the streets of France

BTW why is everyone so concerned about having an EU army anyway? Surely it has benefits for the EU, many countries of which see being a member from a different viewpoint to the UK. It has United Europe in a way it has not been United before and a multi national army may unite foreign policy as well as keeping the peace within.

exactly, but you are dealing with British creme de la creme brule here

Originally Posted by buriramboy

^Are you on the Brussels payroll?

see?

Originally Posted by Seekingasylum

May hasn't actually won the no-confidence vote in the conventional sense - over a third of her parliamentary party want her gone and traditionally that is sufficient for most to resign. Thing is, Brexit is the only game in town and there is no other team captain available to lead, the majority vote was not in fact for May, it was more a case of saying the majority were against all other candidates.

Indeed. A poisoned chalice that she has agreed to take the wrap for reversing and then slinking away to her millions hence "I won't fight the 2022 election". Because she is an EU Federalist which goes hand in hand with being a corrupt multi millionaire (like Butcher Blair) she has no allegiance to the people of the country at all, and is quite willing to pretend to represent them to push her agenda. Even if she had lost she would have been replaced by the other Europhile, Boris Johnson, who also voted remain.

Brexit is being used to cover up their real crimes though. It's a charade. It will go nowhere and you will be receiving your pension in Euros soon enough so no bother.... well until the EU launches their austerity on the country in retaliation.

I wish I was on Soros' payroll
Just get paid for trolling Brexiteers while sipping a beer poolside in Thailand.
Oh well, back to the all Cyrillic grading system.

Originally Posted by Neverna

The EU will clarify a few points.
May will return and explain those clarifications.

Do you mean to say Maybot was just hours away from having MPs vote for her deal when she herself wasn't clear on the exact details of her own deal?

& her lack of clarity on her own deal was/is so immense, that it's going to take 5 weeks before she becomes clear on the details of her own deal?

Originally Posted by foobar

Do you mean to say Maybot was just hours away from having MPs vote for her deal when she herself wasn't clear on the exact details of her own deal?

& her lack of clarity on her own deal was/is so immense, that it's going to take 5 weeks before she becomes clear on the details of her own deal?

Great post ! Is there any chance that you could write it in English ?

Originally Posted by my breasts sag

i wish i was your family member who lost his house but inherited your house after you were written out of the will

trollin' multi

^ My Breasts Sag looks like Pattaya Plies again.

Originally Posted by Troy

]

Whatever are you taking? Butter's confirmed in the post below mine the EU peacekeeping force it had likely been assigned to and Kosovo was one of those assignments. Maybe was simply because it could have returned from a trip to Africa but that's not so likely.

The fact is it is a French made vehicle being used in France not a fooking Tiger tank issuing yellow vests to cause a fooking uprising.

You are reading too much into a vehicle hurriedly pulled out of moth balls for use in the streets of France

BTW why is everyone so concerned about having an EU army anyway? Surely it has benefits for the EU, many countries of which see being a member from a different viewpoint to the UK. It has United Europe in a way it has not been United before and a multi national army may unite foreign policy as well as keeping the peace within.

If it really was a frog vehicle, it would have automatic white flags and 8 reverse gears.

Originally Posted by can123

Great post ! Is there any chance that you could write it in English ?

Do you need a meme?

Originally Posted by Troy

]
Whatever are you taking? Butter's confirmed in the post below mine the EU peacekeeping force it had likely been assigned to and Kosovo was one of those assignments. Maybe was simply because it could have returned from a trip to Africa but that's not so likely.

Sorry, I was clearly wrong because Butters confirmed it was likely...

The fact is it is a French made vehicle being used in France not a fooking Tiger tank issuing yellow vests to cause a fooking uprising.

And now a fact, French made vehicle being used in France. Is part of this 'fact' also that it was likely assigned to Kosovo?

You are reading too much into a vehicle hurriedly pulled out of moth balls for use in the streets of France

Now it was hurriedly pulled out of moth balls...is that likely or a fact, or something you deduced from the previous likelihoods?

BTW why is everyone so concerned about having an EU army anyway? Surely it has benefits for the EU, many countries of which see being a member from a different viewpoint to the UK. It has United Europe in a way it has not been United before and a multi national army may unite foreign policy as well as keeping the peace within.

We finally got there, well done. Only, that's a separate issue entirely, since the formation of an EU army would be a fact in the sovereign sense, unlike as I cited yesterday the stature of a flag or anthem. If the purpose of the EU army is to sideline NATO, it will bankrupt the EU esp with the second net contributor leaving. And don't overdo the celebrations on the final divorce invoice, that's going toward whatever Greece and soon Italy and others will be begging for; then poof it's gone and everyone turns to Frau for more, which I'm sure all good krauts are eager to share for such a worthy cause.

Aside from those trivial money bits, and the false security offered by a prestigious military sponsored by all and effectively controlled by one (your guess which), it is more 'likely' to be used against its own citizens and puny third world wogs than Russia, China or the evil empire over the pond.

As they say, be careful what you wish for, it may come true.

What the majority fail to realise is the French stance on going into foreign theatres.
The rules are quite simple. If it does not benefit France, the answer is a resounding Non!

They have done exactly the same with the UN and NATO in the past.

Arms sales to dictatorships or middle eastern terrorists, no problem. France acts only in Frances interest and it has always been that way.

For an institution that cannot decide on the specification of fruit and vegetables, try getting them to commit french troops to an EU initiative. And it’s often said that Merkel Is indecisive. She ain’t got nuthin on the French.

Acting decisively on behalf of 27 countries is nigh on impossible, so the entire idea is just more grandiose foolishness by the idiots who run the three ring circus that is such a doomed and costly experiment.

Originally Posted by Switch

What the majority fail to realise is the French stance on going into foreign theatres.
The rules are quite simple. If it does not benefit France, the answer is a resounding Non!

They have done exactly the same with the UN and NATO in the past.

Arms sales to dictatorships or middle eastern terrorists, no problem. France acts only in Frances interest and it has always been that way.

For an institution that cannot decide on the specification of fruit and vegetables, try getting them to commit french troops to an EU initiative. And it’s often said that Merkel Is indecisive. She ain’t got nuthin on the French.

Acting decisively on behalf of 27 countries is nigh on impossible, so the entire idea is just more grandiose foolishness by the idiots who run the three ring circus that is such a doomed and costly experiment.

Very true... except that the recent protests show that the actual people of the country are starting to realise that there is a distinct difference between National Interests and the people of Frances interests.

Poor things have been weaned on a sour tit and know no different. When it starts to fray they'll bark at whoever the despots, thieves and incompetents accuse.

Originally Posted by Switch

Acting decisively on behalf of 27 countries is nigh on impossible, so the entire idea is just more grandiose foolishness by the idiots who run the three ring circus that is such a doomed and costly experiment.

NATO is basically North America, Canada and a large mix of European countries, a total of 29, which have difficulty acting together and still lack common 'Command&Control' as well as equipment. The different equipment is IMO more a benefit than a weakness but the lack of common processes and procedures is much more of a problem. If the EU were to standardise their procedures and align their communication networks to a level above that of NATO then previous problems, highlighted during the Balkans conflict, could be significantly reduced. The UK could have played a pivotal role in this if they had wished.

Originally Posted by jabir

Sorry, I was clearly wrong because Butters confirmed it was likely...

Thanks for the apology...



Just getting them ready for the Brexit riots....

damn English scums infiltrated our secret EU army with their vehicles,

Originally Posted by Switch

If it really was a frog vehicle, it would have automatic white flags and 8 reverse gears.

I think you are confusing the Frogs with the Wops....

Originally Posted by Norton

The old gal is certainly expending her energy to push her deal though. Off to the EU summit now. She can't be accused of low energy regardless of her motives.

Doubt the EU will do more than a bit of word smithing so she is pissing into the wind. It will never pass parliament vote.

The will of the British people is no longer even a minor consideration. All about political party survival. Much more insanity to come before the curtian closes on this entertaining opera. Keeping me away from Netscape.

Since the Maybot has promised not to lead the Tories in the next GE she will go down in history as the scapegoat for Brexit and its failings. She won't get any legal changes to the negotiated agreement, just a pat on the back and a few smiles. The agreement is the best Brexit deal on offer, so for those that want Brexit - just take it. The alternative has to be no Brexit at all and this is the way Maybot has to get her agreement through the Commons.

Apparently May only said she wouldn't lead the Tories into the scheduled 2022 general election but was non committal if there was a snap election next year. She will lead the Tories to a 1997 wipe out or worse if doesn't step down. Never thought I'd see a worse PM than Brown but I've proven wrong with the disaster that is Doris.

Originally Posted by Troy

Since the Maybot has promised not to lead the Tories in the next GE she will go down in history as the scapegoat for Brexit and its failings. She won't get any legal changes to the negotiated agreement, just a pat on the back and a few smiles. The agreement is the best Brexit deal on offer, so for those that want Brexit - just take it. The alternative has to be no Brexit at all and this is the way Maybot has to get her agreement through the Commons.

well - no deal brexit is always there
another referendum could be done

the world is not limited to my deal or no brexit

The deal on offer isn't Brexit though, that's the problem.