Thread: Two Anglo Whites Forced to shut down Burrito shop

Wrong tense, I've joined already.

No PC-Commie-liburrrral-Mussie is getting their filthy ethnic hands on my burritos!

^^Just a little food truck, those are typically staffed by the owners and are basically labors of love. Some of them go on to do other things. Wouldn't a front of a mexican slinging their appropriated food be even worse? That is a joke of course considering that none of this makes any sense whatsoever.

Oh on another note here is a picture of Chipotle's owner.



Yeah he's made millions and millions of dollars by appropriating another culture's food and looks to be possibly the whitest douche on the planet.

But people went after two young owners operating out of a roach coach. Because they are fucking retarded beyond all hope.

Originally Posted by redhaze

As someone who used to own a business that had clear and unambiguous roots in another culture (and who is not from that culture) something like this happening would have devastating to me and my family and I'm sure it was for these poor ladies as well.

Really? You mean you wouldn't just laugh if off as being a totally stupid thing to be "accused" of?

Where is Snake Eyes ?

Possibly a militant lesbian based PC cyber attack.....

After the review was published, Kristin Goodman, co-founder of feminist workspace Broadspace, circulated what she called a "shit list" of "white-owned, appropriative restaurants." [Update: As of 11 am on June 7, the document has been deleted or made private.] The list names more than 60 restaurants that serve ethnic cuisine but are owned by a white person.

"White business owners wield economic and 'cultural capital' advantages over POC (people of color" business owners, so they are 'punching down' by appropriating cuisines from people who are disadvantaged in comparison," the list says.

The list identifies Pok Pok (Thai), Voodoo Doughnut (religious appropriation) and the Alibi (Polynesian), with suggestions of POC-owned businesses that readers of the list should frequent instead. The Portland Mercury decried the "pattern of appropriation" Kooks represented and linked to the list, calling it a "who's who of culinary white supremacy." Nine days later, the Mercury pulled the Kooks story from its website and issued a retraction.

Meanwhile, the owners of Kooks received so many threats—at least 10 of which were death threats, they told WW— that two days after our review appeared, they closed their business because they felt unsafe.

http://www.wweek.com/restaurants/new...s-to-weigh-in/

Originally Posted by fred flintstone

Kristin Goodman, co-founder of feminist workspace Broadspace,

Luigi is making a curry on another thread. Let's get him!!!!!

My once English neighbourhood High st is now awash with proprietors from Afghanistan and regions who open and run "Pizza" take away or Colonel Fried Chicken take aways, I'd be arrested if I pointed out that these invaders had stolen another's food making culture recipes.

I lean to the left, but the people who persecuted these women are absolute pratts.

Most small bakeries in NZ are owned and operated by Cambodians or Vietnamese.
I'm sure nobody would complain that they produce excellent pies.

I get a little bit hot under the collar when Maori whine about cultural appropriation for things like a Disney movie having traditional Maori designs on a cartoon depiction of a wall, or my mate's craft beer which has a Maori name on the label. But at least the people complaining have some sort of "ownership" of the IP. But the dyke feminazi who published the "shit list" is way over the top; she's not even crusading for her own culture and I bet she didn't ask the Mexicans if they cared.

The women who started the burrito shop should have stuck it out.

It would be nice to see them reconsider. Death threats do have a way of putting together 7 dollar burritos with 5 dollar overhead seem much less appealing

After reading some responses it seems (once again) that people have missed the entire point.

Should any person or people, based on their ethnicity, race, nationality, location or origin, - NOT - be able to cook certain foods and offer them to the public?

Originally Posted by redhaze

Death threats do have a way of putting together 7 dollar burritos with 5 dollar overhead seem much less appealing

That's the irony. Wrong for non-poc to sell ethnic food, OK to lodge death threats and violence at the 'violators'. A good law suit to the dyke who instigated it all would be fitting.

^^ Though of course if it were mexicans making apple pie you'd only be interested in their legal status.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Though of course if it were mexicans making apple pie you'd only be interested in their legal status.

I wouldn't personally, but there would be someone there making it an issue, especially if they were making money at it.

Yes, that was for the newly colour-blind cp.

The point is about food.

And should all people in their world be able to cook and offer the foods that they want to the public?

Nothing more; nothing less.

Originally Posted by Cold Pizza

And should all people in their world be able to cook and offer the foods that they want to the public?

Of course not, it'd be chaos.

Originally Posted by fred flintstone

Originally Posted by Cold Pizza

And should all people in their world be able to cook and offer the foods that they want to the public?

Of course not, it'd be chaos.

I presume you are joking, Fred.

Silly bullshit this. Using same logic, Mexicans should not be allowed to cook Mexican food because Mexican food is based on Spanish, Mayan and other Native American foods.

Is Cold Pizza one of the women ?

Originally Posted by Mike Watson

Is Cold Pizza one of the women ?

Maybe both