Thread: Mueller's Russian Interference investigation

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

jesus, did you share a kool aid with Hillary ?

they are making up charges, everyone knows it. Next you are going to tell us that McCarthism was a good thing,

because that's exactly what it is.

Trump being an idiot, is irrelevant in this debate.

Hillary!




Make the Trump crime syndicate great again.

This Vanity Fair article is interesting. It says Robert Mueller is investigating Trump for leaking classified material to the Russians. (Trump is beholden to Moscow or just a moron?)

EXCLUSIVE: WHAT TRUMP REALLY TOLD KISLYAK AFTER COMEY WAS CANNED

During a May 10 meeting in the Oval Office, the president betrayed his intelligence community by leaking the content of a classified, and highly sensitive, Israeli intelligence operation to two high-ranking Russian envoys, Sergey Kislyak and Sergey Lavrov. This is what he told them—and the ramifications.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017...ump-intel-slip

He is just truly a moron. He would've told them that to try to impress them - that's how jejune he is and how silly this distills down to.

Prior to his meeting with Xi in China there was press about how the Chinese could/would pander to his ego to get what they wanted.

So even though it was hardly a state secret sure enough Trump obliges by dribbling on about how his reception was the 'bigliest ever!' etc. etc.

Originally Posted by misskit

This Vanity Fair article is interesting. It says Robert Mueller is investigating Trump for leaking classified material to the Russians. (Trump is beholden to Moscow or just a moron?)

EXCLUSIVE: WHAT TRUMP REALLY TOLD KISLYAK AFTER COMEY WAS CANNED


During a May 10 meeting in the Oval Office, the president betrayed his intelligence community by leaking the content of a classified, and highly sensitive, Israeli intelligence operation to two high-ranking Russian envoys, Sergey Kislyak and Sergey Lavrov. This is what he told them—and the ramifications.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017...ump-intel-slip

Any information on where Blum got the information for this article.

^old news, was well reported and documented back in May.

Michael Flynn's lawyers have told other defense lawyers in the ongoing Russia probe, including President Donald Trump's legal team, that they're no longer able to share information, a source familiar with the matter told CNN. The source added that the decision to cease informal information-sharing could be an indication Flynn is preparing to plead guilty in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.

The New York Times first reported the change Thursday, citing four people involved with the case, and added that it could be "an indication that Mr. Flynn is cooperating with prosecutors or negotiating ... a deal."

While Flynn's lawyers had previously shared information with Trump's team, the change does not necessarily indicate that Flynn is cooperating with Mueller.

Jay Sekulow, a member of Trump's legal team, said that the decision to no longer share information "is not entirely unexpected" and shouldn't be seen as an indication of cooperation.

"No one should draw the conclusion that this means anything about General Flynn cooperating against the President," Sekulow added.

Lawyers can pull out of information-sharing arrangements for a variety of reasons, including concerns of potential conflicts of interest that may arise at a later date. Information sharing may also be abandoned, for example, when a lawyer is attempting to negotiate with prosecutors, but those negotiations aren't always successful.

Flynn's lawyers declined to comment.

Mueller is currently conducting a special investigation to look into Russian interference in the 2016 election and any potential ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The Times' report Thursday comes just weeks after CNN reported Flynn was concerned about the potential legal exposure of his son, Michael Flynn Jr. in the investigation.

Interviews conducted by special counsel investigators have included questions about the business dealings of Flynn and his son such as their firm's reporting of income from work overseas, two witnesses interviewed by the team previously told CNN. The Foreign Agents Registration Act requires people acting as agents of foreign entities to publicly disclose their relationship with foreign countries or businesses and financial compensation for such work.

Flynn was subject to questions and scrutiny during his brief stint as the White House national security adviser over phone calls with the former Russian ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyak.

CNN previously reported that Flynn initially told investigators that he did not discuss sanctions with Kislyak, but later changed his answer to say he didn't remember. Mueller could potentially use this to charge Flynn with making false statements -- the same charge that former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to last month.

Former Trump campaign officials Paul Manafort and Rick Gates already face charges relating to their undisclosed foreign lobbying for Ukraine. They were indicted by Mueller's grand jury last month. Both have pleaded not guilty.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/23/polit...mes/index.html

^Probably made a deal to keep Flynn Jr out of jail.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Any information on where Blum got the information for this article.

He has sources, as you would expect from a 30 year veteran who's had two Pulitzer nominations.

I would suspect from the content that his source was someone who was in the room or had a first hand account.

Jay Sekulow, a member of Trump's legal team, said that the decision to no longer share information "is not entirely unexpected" and shouldn't be seen as an indication of cooperation.

"No one should draw the conclusion that this means anything about General Flynn cooperating against the President," Sekulow added.....

....While crossing his fingers behind his back and attempting not to soil himself.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

He has sources, as you would expect from a 30 year veteran who's had two Pulitzer nominations.

I would suspect from the content that his source was someone who was in the room or had a first hand account.

In in times past I would believe this to be true but the media has become such a shit fest toward Trump I am always interested in the source of these reports.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

In in times past I would believe this to be true but the media has become such a shit fest toward Trump I am always interested in the source of these reports.

Yeah, of course it's all "fake news" because orange cunto says so eh?

Grab a coffee and read this if you wish.

I still think orange cunto will be implicated in laundering stolen roubles.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/featu...-knew-too-much

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Yeah, of course it's all "fake news" because orange cunto says so eh?

Typical over reaction from.I did not say it was fake news I was saying I question the source of anything Trump,you and I both know there are liberals out there that would say anything to bash Trump into leaving office.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

you and I both know there are liberals out there that would say anything to bash Trump into leaving office.

Is that so? Perhaps you can provide some links to back up that assertion.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Is that so? Perhaps you can provide some links to back up that assertion.

Who needs links you you said you would do anything to see Trump taken down.Who in their right mind would believe you are the only liberal out there to take this stance.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Typical over reaction from.I did not say it was fake news I was saying I question the source of anything Trump,you and I both know there are liberals out there that would say anything to bash Trump into leaving office.

That's because you're too senile to tell the difference between a Fox News hack and a Pulitzer-nominated journalist.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Is that so? Perhaps you can provide some links to back up that assertion.

There is no fucking way you are that thick! The negative media treatment of the Trump presidency has never seen any equal, even GWB!

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

There is no fucking way you are that thick! The negative media treatment of the Trump presidency has never seen any equal, even GWB!

That's because he's a complete c u n t, you moron. They only report what they find.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Grab a coffee and read this if you wish.

I still think orange cunto will be implicated in laundering stolen roubles.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/featu...-knew-too-much

Are you implying you think Trump is somehow involved in this.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Who needs links you you said you would do anything to see Trump taken down.Who in their right mind would believe you are the only liberal out there to take this stance.

I am just a regular citizen, not a respected journalist. So your comparison is absurd.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

here is no fucking way you are that thick! The negative media treatment of the Trump presidency has never seen any equal, even GWB!

Shut the fuck up Earl Drumpf steps on his own micro penis constantly the media does not need to be biased you bozo he does it all to himself.

Originally Posted by bsnub

I am just a regular citizen, not a respected journalist. So your comparison is absurd.




Shut the fuck up Earl Drumpf steps on his own micro penis constantly the media does not need to be biased you bozo he does it all to himself.

Why would I believe a journalist with your zeal to remove Trump would be any different,even a US senator called for his assasination.

What's the difference between Micheal Flynn and Walt Disnney

Flynn sings and Walt Disney

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Are you implying you think Trump is somehow involved in this.

Did they not teach you how to read at school?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Did they not teach you how to read at school?

Never once saw Trump's name mentioned.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Why would I believe a journalist with your zeal to remove Trump would be any different

Brietbart and right wing media have you right where they want you. You only trust propaganda sources and reject highly respected journalists who have proven to be credible for decades. You are a hoodwinked fool.