Hard to disagree unless you're a russia loving republican.....
Trump, Treasonous Traitor
Trump is right now, before our eyes and those of the world, committing an unbelievable and unforgivable crime against this country. It is his failure to defend.
The intelligence community long ago concluded that Russia attacked our election in 2016 with the express intention of damaging Hillary Clinton and assisting Trump.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/15/o...ion-putin.html
Last edited by uncle junior; 16-07-2018 at 12:21 PM.
Yet, now, irrefutable proof exists that agents sought to create pressure to get “derogatory” information and a “pretext” to interview people close to a future president they didn’t like.
Clear evidence also exists that an investigation into still-unproven collusion between a foreign power and a U.S. presidential candidate was driven less by secret information from Moscow and more by politically tainted media leaks.
Lead investigator Hillary and Russian hacking.
In one particular message, when Page asked if Trump would ever become president, Strzok reportedly replied, “No. No he won't. We'll stop it.”
The investigation was biased and not accurate. Which you are all going to find out because you can't spare the time to listen to the Senate hearings (cause those of us who did know what happened).
http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/395...trump-campaign
He's ma very stable genius.
This is great, the excerpts from the press conference.
i posted about this earlier, and IMO, what's not getting enough attention is that the russian hackers stole democrats' analytic data. no one would want access to this information more than the republicans--and specifically the trump campaign.
if you're wondering what 'collusion' looks like...this would be it.
The point is Russia undoubtedly interfered in the Election process.
Will Trump have the balls to confront Putin about it.
He seems quite happy to attack Merkle and May (Women).
Is he man enough to stand upm to Putin?
If Russian interference saved thousands of children trapped in a cave but was illegal how would you feel? I have heard that the Russians released emails from the democratic party that were damning and should have been made known to the American people. Kind of the same thing. It was a small operation at manipulation of American media at best. If you want to read about a big one, really big one, take a gander at the enclosed link for some real professional meddling.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/...secondworldwar
Good lord you are beyond help. So you are comparing state sponsored espionage against the US to the actions of peaceful protesters in England. That is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard.
Still does not change the fact that almost every nonsensical post you have made has been utterly destroyed for the nonsense that it is.
Re my post and straw man I have no idea. 1. Russia didn't do anything bad. 2. They had no affect on the election. 3. If they helped Americans make a more intelligent choice like Radio Free whatever does for Russia good on em. If you want to see an example of successful and real meddling look at the British and BSC. If the Russians did that kind of stuff I might be angry but they don't have the brains.
No Mark that is not how it works. The demograhic that watches comics like Colbert also tend to read the NYT. They are typically better educated and tend not to watch cable news. Most of them have already have had their fill of the new throughout the course of the day. At night they like to laugh at the absurdity of it all.
What is it that you take issue with regards to the clip Mark? Because I thought it was spot on. Could it be that you don't like it because you are a trumpanzee?
So just because she said that you believe it is true? Laughable. Even if it were true and there is no sure way of knowing that, it would not lesson the fact that Russia attacked our electoral process. That is nothing less than an act of war.
The GOP during the time of Reagan would have been all over this. Today they visit Moscow on American independence day. Shameful.
Utter bullshit and nothing but propaganda from the right wing fever swamps. The FBI director has no say in who is prosecuted that falls under the Justice Department. So if Jeff Sessions wanted to he could prosecute Hillary at anytime. The fact is that there is no evidence to do so.
Just because that keeps being repeated doesn't make it true. Ask yourselves who is it that keeps grinding that axe to make it so? Does the MIC need a new enemy?
Fuck Trump and Clinton...all this Russia this, Russia that BS reminds me of this:
Could it be that the same bunch who sent their stooge Powell to the UN, to make a false case for war in Iraq, is behind this Russian madness?
The stench of the neocon/neolib MO is strong in this one.
edit: The NYT via Judith Miller was right there at Powell's side making that false Iraq war case. So you all trust them now?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)