^How about the report the DHS made in Oct 2016 saying Russians had hacked emails trying to sway the vote for a trump win?
Last edited by uncle junior; 29-06-2018 at 04:28 PM.
why do you think it's been two years, mark?
why do you think that 'billions' have been spent on the investigation, mark?
do you think that law enforcement should release evidence before the investigation is completed, mark?
just moments ago you complained that the special counsel's office hasn't released any 'factual evidence' and now you're commenting on the strength of the 'factual evidence' that hasn't been released, mark.
1. The indictment pulls the curtain back on four big questions that have swirled around the Russian influence operation, which, it turns out, began in 2014:
2. Mueller probe 20 million so far and all the the American "Intelligence services" full on investigation since 2014? If you know anything about American "Intelligence" you know how expensive it is. I have an acquaintance who gets paid $217,000.00 a year to answer the phone.
3. That is what Comey has just said in his interview with the BBC on hard copy and why he announced to the public a few days before the election that the FBI was reopening the Clinton email investigation. He said the FBI did it all the time. If you turn on the TV you may catch the rest of the interview. Then you can be as well informed as I.
4. Mueller's information about election intervention will pale in comparison to Comey's FBI intervention which is common knowledge
The Unmaking of the President 2016: How FBI Director James Comey Cost Hillary Clinton the Presidency Lanny Davis Clinton lawyer
What a fucking moron. Sadly it is people like this that represent a good part of the US. This guy, boon mee, and repeater666 are examples of the right in America. Trump nation.
He's done his homework on how to be a trump troll. Has no clue about what he's on about, makes up stuff to fit his argument, general fuckwittery.....covered all his bases
I answered all of your questions even numbering them. No name calling. Just straight answers. You called me a troll, liar and fuckwittery. I asked my friend who is an part time internet ombudsman. He said. You answered the questions no name calling posted links and even numbered your reply for easy understanding. The other poster answered no questions or debated no points and called you a troll and liar and fuckwittery. Seems obvious who is the troll.
I watched the softball interview of Comey on BBC two times yesterday and today. Sakur was really nice to him but called him a liar and told him he got Hillary defeated. Listen to the interview. The flamer part is I answer questions and don't insult people. Mostly other people don't debate me because they don't have the mental agility or knowledge or education so they call me names. Call me names and I'll put you on ignore as an example for other posters who don't like the name calling flaming stuff. Up to you.
You’re too precious and highly strung for forums. You’re going to very quickly wind-up talking to yourself - and let’s be honest, that’s antithetical to a troll like you since you need the attention.
I want to talk about Mueller's Russian investigation and everybody else wants to talk about me. Let me assure you I'm not that interesting. I think the topic is. In my mind that is the difference between a troll/flamer and a normal poster. One wants to talk about the topic and the others want to talk about the personalities of the posters.
Stephen Sackur interviewing James Comey on Hardtalk (audio).
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3cswj8l
A good interview, from both sides.
^keep it up and he's gonna put you on double secret ignore
Maybe you could quote my post when responding to me then he will see it regardless of whether I am on ignore or not.
Glad to see Mueller is adding more people to his team. With the progress he has already made, he obviously has a lot to work with.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...nvestigations/
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)