Live streaming options anyone?
Live streaming options anyone?
Or....I could just watch CNN on TV...
I'm still a 'tard at times
Fox are just avoiding the golden showers aspect of the story.
They're taking the piss!
On CNN, the knives appear to be sharpened....
^ Its full stream ahead.
Yawn...Originally Posted by buriramboy
The guy is genuinely a fuckwit....
^ you sound pissed.
Take a shower to cool off and you will be golden
trump regarding the golden shower:
"btw, i'm a germaphode"
I went and bought beer...this shit is so wild that it's beyond beliefOriginally Posted by longway
Unless they're watching CNN's live feed,,,Originally Posted by buriramboy
What's the criteria for being a progressive?
Trump to cnn: you are fake news.
classic: and the cnn reporter was babbling: "but, but, but"Originally Posted by longway
caught with egg on their faces
Last edited by Farangrakthai; 12-01-2017 at 12:21 AM.
Press conf was a fucking success !!!
well done Trump,
I shall congratulate him directly on Twitter
Libtards = warmongers.
Fuck the lot of you. God bless the Donald.
as is well known, the obama admin with lindsey graham/john mcain/cia supportOriginally Posted by buriramboy
has supported alqueda-linked groups to fight the syrian govt.
this FUCKING neo-con ideology- sponsored nonsense of taking out khadafi, saddam, trying to take out Assad (who with out the help of russia, hezbollah and Iran would probably have fallen to ISIS and alqueda) has to end. the neo-con's Utopian dreams are unrealistic as they are insincere. if they were sincere, they would focus on the u.s's greatest ally (saudi).
IMO, hillary (pressing for the invasion of libya) had too much neo-con in her and looking forward to trump's new "realist" foreign policy and fortunately kissinger is still alive and as has been reported has been giving advice to trump.
a couple articles, some might have read:
Excellent report from liberal media watchdog "Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)":
<hr><hr><hr><hr>
In other words, the US government outsourced its war against the Syrian government to Al Qaeda, and Americans have no idea, because corporate media continue to promote lies about Obama’s so-called inaction.
Almost always overlooked in the US (and UK) media narrative is the fact that the rebels in East Aleppo were a patchwork of Western- and Gulf-backed jihadist groups dominated by Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra)—Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria—along with its ally, Ahrar al-Sham (Daily Beast, ; Foreign Policy, ). These groups are explicitly anti-democratic and have been implicated in human rights violations, from and to using as human shields.
In the absence of any desire to evoke a political response, US media would surely have identified East Aleppo’s rebels by the name of the most famous militant group in the world—Al Qaeda. Yet press reports regularly referred to the militant forces dominating East Aleppo simply as “rebels.”
These sentiments totally contradict one of US media’s most pernicious lies—that US inaction allowed the bloodshed in Syria to continue with impunity.
“Many thousands of people have been killed in Aleppo…but Washington shrugs,” lamented the New York Times (). “The United States’ inaction in Syria has transformed our country into nothing other than a bystander to the greatest atrocity of our time,” complained Leon Wieseltier in the Washington Post ().
But Washington has intervened (FAIR.org, )—and by doing so, it prolonged the bloodshed and empowered Al Qaeda.
Despite being about the extremist and violently sectarian ideology that dominated the opposition as early as November 2011, the Obama administration spent, according to the Washington Post (), a colossal $1 billion-a-year training and funneling weapons to Al Qaeda–linked extremists in order to weaken the Syrian government.
In written testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in June 2016, Brett McGurk, the US special presidential envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter IS, warned that “Nusra is now Al Qaeda’s largest formal affiliate in history.” According to US intelligence officials, Nusra is starting to plot attacks against the US.
In other words, the US government outsourced its war against the Syrian government to Al Qaeda, and Americans have no idea, because corporate media continue to promote lies about Obama’s so-called inaction.
full article: In Syria, Western Media Cheer Al Qaeda | FAIR
<hr><hr><hr><hr>----
Good to see Kerry recognize that Russia, Iran and Hezbollah saved Syria from being taken over by al-queda and ISIS.
John Kerry: Russia And Iran "Saved" Syria And Bashar al-Assad From Being Overthrown By Islamic Extremists | Video | RealClearPolitics
JOHN KERRY: When President Putin came in, he came in partly to prop up Assad, but also because ISIL/Da'esh was gaining huge ground. The radical extremists were gaining huge ground against Assad, and Assad was in a very fragile position. And so together, Iran and Russia had to prop him up, and save him from the possibilities that the extremists might take over the country.
And I will say, that was not something that we weren't also concerned about -- that there was a gaining foothold of al-Nusra, and Da'esh, in their ability to push towards Damascus. And the regime was on its heels. Did Putin make an enormous difference in that? Yes, along with Iran and Hezbollah and the entities that basically overwhelmed some of the forces available to the opposition.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)