Thread: President Donald Trump

This is why the two parties are not the same as skkin would like you to believe...

Another good one...

Originally Posted by uncle junior

^she apologized....what up wit dat

Originally Posted by raycarey

she didn't apologize, the economists did.

i was wrong. sanders did apologize.

so, i...errr...apologize to you.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Omarosa possesses a size-able challenging posterior but it is not insurmountable.





If one could ignore the tornado of abuse, deceit, probable beatings, has the fitness, endurance, a raw red meat diet required to obtain the maximum from this potential powerhouse - and pays the entrance fee, new erotic heights could be attained here but at another cost, possibly one's dignity, that too can be overlooked 'in the moment' or 'short time' by putting scruples aside and plowing forth.


The drumbeat of Africa or even modern rhythms are applicable here, 4/4 progressing to 3/4 for nuance and thence finishing in a 2/4 presto would be advisable, the Joe Morello / Dave Brubeck time signatures of 5's/7's/9's will be ridiculed and not tolerated by Omarosa, however with the volatility of this subject it is possible a loud crude demand for an immediate and ongoing 2/4 presto would be forthcoming. No pun intended.



Expect raucous demeaning insults and reply to them forcefully for maximum return Omarosa pelvic power.



Positions;
The canine copulating stance will be 'presented' and enforced, as will the cowgirl, both front and reverse power positions.
If the supine is offered, ruthless, deep and relentless plunging n' grinding is required. Those with less than 8" members should decline and leave the premises before being humiliated for life.
Cursing, blasphemy and insults towards both mothers' and especially sarcasm is to be expected. Done correctly this could be a turning point and a brutal beating or slugfest may be averted, if not, a short hospital stay may be deeply satisfying with it's reflections for those gentlemen with refined tastes.




You won't forget to shower with this one.




PS: Cunnilingus - not recommended here.






Next Week;


Bestiality with Whoopi Goldberg (gender unknown) ..a Liberal Cumfest. ..Be there.





Coming Soon;

Rosie O'Donnell..... The Irish potato, obese & mouthy, bull-dykes only

How many pixels had to die so that load of gibberish could be posted.

I think he's the offspring of an unholy copulation between Ben and Huanglau.

I had a thought it might've been that Mark-whatever guy reborn with another login.

Not so sure now, seems to be even less coherent than he was.

Originally Posted by uncle junior

erratic behavior.......

At the time, Ms. Sanders said that Mr. Trump was considering doing it because “they politicized, and in some cases monetized, their public service and security clearances.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/u...clearance.html

I swear, you couldn't make up this shit.

His whole MO is to accuse his enemies of what he's guilty of....I'm not the puppet; you're the puppet'...the Pee Wee Herman defense

An Ipsos poll released this month found 43% of Republicans agreed that the president should have the authority to close news outlets engaged in “bad behaviour”.

And you know what these fuckers would do given the chance.





Over 200 US news organisations launch #EnemyOfNone campaign against Trump

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

I had a thought it might've been that Mark-whatever guy reborn with another login.

There are similarities. They are both brainwashed trumpanzees who have latched on to your typical brainless right wing conspiracy theories. This guys buys into nonsense like "Clinton/Obama cabal" and I am sure he buys into the whole pizzgate/Q nonsense as well. A dumb shitbird however you slice it.

well one eratic nutter to another, it takes one to know one

New polls shows only 31% of Americans like Drumpf as a person.

Originally Posted by bsnub

New polls shows only 31% of Americans like Drumpf as a person.

The same polls who predicted the Hillary landslide...

Thursday, August 16, 2018
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 49% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Fifty percent (50%) disapprove.

Seems like MSNBC precious liberals are slow learners.

^ Rasmussen is biggest trash poll out there. I see the mods made a mistake in letting you out of your monkey cage.

Originally Posted by bsnub

polls shows only 31% of Americans like Drumpf as a person.

"As a person"? 31% would seem quite high. His public persona is one that is despicable in every way.

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ Rasmussen is biggest trash poll out there.

I'm no expert about polls, but all the polls you're quoting were dead wrong before the election.
Rasmussen showed some considerable accuracy.
What would that tell a reasonably intelligent independent thinker?

Originally Posted by precious

I see the mods made a mistake in letting you out of your monkey cage.

Does looking at facts make you uncomfortable?
Do you need a safe space?
Like your mommy's basement?

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Does looking at facts make you uncomfortable?

You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you in the ass.

Originally Posted by bsnub

You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you in the ass.

That would be your opinion, of course, not an established fact.

The fact you fail to grasp there snub, is that the Trump Presidency is indeed achieving significant success on many levels.
Come November mid term elections, this will be a fact the MSM cannot easily ignore.

So hang on to your ass Snubber, because the October surprise from Trump will very like blow the entire DNC and RINO fucktards out of the water!

Former intelligence leaders: Trump attempting to 'stifle free speech' by revoking Brennan's clearance


Over a dozen former senior intelligence officials -- a group that includes officials who served under both Democratic and Republican presidents -- are denouncing President Donald Trump's decision to revoke former CIA Director John Brennan's security clearance as "ill-considered" and "unprecedented."With the exception of Brennan -- and excluding those who served under Trump -- every CIA director since George Tenet, who took over the agency in 1996, signed the letter.

"We all agree that the president's action regarding John Brennan and the threats of similar action against other former officials has nothing to do with who should and should not hold security clearances -- and everything to do with an attempt to stifle free speech," the former senior intelligence officials, including former CIA directors, former CIA deputy directors, and a former director of national intelligence, said in a statement released Thursday.

They went on to argue, "We have never before seen the approval or removal of security clearances used as a political tool, as was done in this case."

"Beyond that, this action is quite clearly a signal to other former and current officials," the former officials said, adding that the signal "is inappropriate and deeply regrettable."

The list originally included 12 officials, but overnight, former CIA director and Defense Secretary Robert Gates added himself to the list. FormerDirector of National Intelligence Dennis Blair and former Deputy CIA Director Bert Calland also signed onto the statement Friday.

One of the signees, former director of the CIA and NSA Michael Hayden told CNN's John Berman Friday on "New Day" that making the decision to sign the statement was not difficult.

"Using the security clearance process to punish a political opponent was simply inappropriate even though we admit that the president has absolute authority in this area," Hayden said. "It's just a bad thing to do for the health of the American republic and the health of American debate."

The former intelligence leaders added in their statement that "decisions on security clearances should be based on national security concerns and not political views."

They also defended Brennan's character and called allegations against Brennan of wrongdoing "baseless."

Hayden and James Clapper, another official on the statement and the former Director of National Intelligence under President Barack Obama, are both included on a list of officials that the administration is considering stripping of security clearances. Both have been outspoken against Trump.

Trump announced on Wednesday that he was revoking Brennan's security clearance, first citing that the former CIA director posed a security risk. He later, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, connected Brennan's security clearance revocation with the Russia investigation, saying the probe was a "witch hunt" and "these people led it."

Trump told reporters Friday that he's received a "tremendous response" after revoking Brennan's clearance.

Following the President's comments, former CIA director and onetime Trump campaign adviser James Woolsey issued a separate statement in which he said "objective criteria" should be used in evaluating who gets to keep a security clearance.

Woolsey was not able to review the joint statement issued by the other former intelligence chiefs by the deadline, and chose to write his own statement, according to a person with knowledge of the decision.

The President said he would "soon" revoke the clearance of Bruce Ohr, a Justice Department official whom Trump has criticized for his connections to a dossier of infamous allegations about the US President and Russia. The dossier -- portions of which remain unconfirmed -- was commissioned as opposition research by political opponents of then-candidate Trump and compiled by a former British intelligence agent. Ohr was demoted upon the discovery of certain meetings with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson, whose firm was behind dossier, and Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who assembled it.

The mention of Ohr on Friday is notable because he currently works at the Justice Department and has not publicly criticized Trump.

Brennan, who served under Obama, was one of the intelligence chiefs who signed off on the intelligence community's January 2017 assessment that Russia interfered with the intent to help Trump and to hurt Hillary Clinton.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/17/polit...als/index.html