Page 32 of 265 FirstFirst ... 2224252627282930313233343536373839404282132 ... LastLast
Results 776 to 800 of 6611
  1. #776
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:15 PM
    Posts
    15,185
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    Referendum. Magnanimous result.
    How does this logic work?

    If the residents of Chinatown in Sydney decided to hold a referendum tomorrow and then declared that the area to the east of Darling Harbour was now part of the Peoples Republic of China should the Australian federal government just accept this outcome and cede sovereignty of part of Australia to China?

    Should the rest of the world accept this as a legal and fair territorial acquisition?

  2. #777
    Thailand Expat
    Takeovers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:41 PM
    Location
    Berlin Germany
    Posts
    7,056
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    Because it happened rather quickly and PUTIN had nothing to do with it. The Ethnic russians in Crimea were under thug brutish attacks by your nazi mates, so they had a referendum, and voted almost to a man to rejoin Russia.
    Yeah right. The crimean people cried out for help from russian tanks just like the people of Checkoslovakia did to put down the oppressive Dubcek regime.

    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    Also, I have asked this before of your lot of denialists; show me one piece of solid evidence that Russia are supplying arms and heavy weapons to their brothers in Crimea.
    Yeah, right again. Some gang of coal miners defeated the Ukraine army singlehanded without any help.

  3. #778
    Dislocated Member
    Neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    31-10-2021 @ 03:34 AM
    Location
    Nebuchadnezzar
    Posts
    10,609
    ^^
    Not the same though. No historical or contemporary parallels in terms of conflict and ethnicity, and missing the paramount geographical importance.
    Putin knew he was going to get shafted on Crimea, taking flack for an undemocratic acquisition of it is by far the lesser of unfavorable outcomes.

  4. #779
    Dislocated Member
    Neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    31-10-2021 @ 03:34 AM
    Location
    Nebuchadnezzar
    Posts
    10,609
    App Developers in Crimea are Getting Cut Off Thanks to US Sanctions

    By Chris Mills on at

    When one country annexes another there's some things you expect to happen, like airstrikes or strongly-worded letters to the UN. One consequence you probably wouldn't have predicted is no longer being able to spend your hard-earned pennies on particular apps.

    In a (rather belated) response to the Russian annexation of the Crimean Peninsula last year, Barack Obama signed an Executive Order on 19th December listing a new range of sanctions against the Crimean region. The move was meant to put the economic thumbscrews on Vladimir Putin, but it's had a rather unexpected result for the people of Crimea.

    The sanctions prohibit the import or export of any "good, service or technology" from the US to the region.

    Among other things, that means that app developers can't make iPhone games any more, and Apple has been sending out emails to affected parties informing them. As TechCrunch reports, Crimean developers are banned from publishing apps, and have to stop using any Apple-provided software or tools immediately.

    Money owed to the developers for app sales has also been frozen in escrow.

    Apple isn't the first tech company to cut off Crimea, either: gaming platform Valve has apparently shut down Steam in the region, as well. Thanks to geopolitics and Putin, Crimean kids can't play Call of Duty any more.
    Presumably, however, the sanctions will apply equally to all tech companies, not just Valve and Apple.

    There's no indication yet that Google or Microsoft have shut down developers for their app stores; in fact, a Crimean developer interviewed by Russia Beyond The Headlines said that "Crimean developers have no problems with Google".

    In the meantime, affected devs are using fairly simple workarounds, like listing a Russian or Ukrainian address. But it's still a fun (and depressing) reminder of how international posturing can affect even the lowliest Flappy Bird clone.
    Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!"

  5. #780
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:15 PM
    Posts
    15,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Neo
    Not the same though. No historical or contemporary parallels in terms of conflict and ethnicity
    There are parallels for ethnicity. Chinatown is primarily populated by ethnic Chinese not caucasian Australians.

    You are saying if there was any 'conflict' between the chinese population and Australians then such an annexation would become a legally viable course of action for China to pursue?

    Quote Originally Posted by Neo
    and missing the paramount geographical importance.
    Can you expand on this? You say because Crimea has geographically strategic importance it is a valid target for annexation?

  6. #781
    Dislocated Member
    Neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    31-10-2021 @ 03:34 AM
    Location
    Nebuchadnezzar
    Posts
    10,609
    Japan and Darwin, with a limited history of conflict in the Australian region region would be a better analogy for you to use. I'm sure there is no history of conflict between China and a suburb of Sydney. The realpolitik of the Crimea is more akin to the Falklands in terms of geopolitical importance and historical and ethnic bonds. Russia has limited access to the Atlantic and Mediterranean regions. I'm sure if Russia hadn't secured Crimea it would now be in the hands of NATO proxy forces, impeding a crucial trade route to Russia and escalating the conflict significantly.
    Last edited by Neo; 20-01-2015 at 06:09 PM.

  7. #782
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:15 PM
    Posts
    15,185
    You can make a reasonable case that the Crimean peninsula belonged historically and ethnically to Russia but that does not excuse the breaking of the rules of engagement when it comes to international diplomatic relations expected of a reasonably developed G20 nation.

    The Crimean peninsula was the sovereign territory of the nation of Ukraine.

    Interfering in other country's political processes as the US (and probably also Russia) has been guilty of on many occasions in the past is a bit underhand but it is not in the same ball park as spitting the dummy when you come second and then forcibly annexing your neighbour's territory against that sovereign nations express will.

    There is no legitimacy whatsoever to the railroad sham poll and the annexation it supposedly 'validated'.

    The rules of engagement evolve slowly but they are evolving away from violence as a means of resolution and any attempt to drag the world backwards in its political evolution should be opposed in the strongest possible terms.

  8. #783
    Dislocated Member
    Neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    31-10-2021 @ 03:34 AM
    Location
    Nebuchadnezzar
    Posts
    10,609
    I think you're only seeing one side of the story, but I'll agree to disagree.

    Question though... given that the region is now relatively stable after the 2014 conflict, would you agree that NATO control of Crimea, with the naval base and port at Sevastopol and domination over the narrow straights into the Sea of Azov, would increase the prospect of a far more serious military conflict between Russian and NATO forces?


    Personally I cannot see how it would not escalate the situation.
    I'm certainly not waving the flag for either side, when you look at both sides I don't think rhetoric based on morality has any credibility. But I think Russia did the right thing, for their own national security and for regional stability.

  9. #784
    Thailand Expat
    Takeovers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:41 PM
    Location
    Berlin Germany
    Posts
    7,056
    Quote Originally Posted by Neo
    Question though... given that the region is now relatively stable after the 2014 conflict, would you agree that NATO control of Crimea, with the naval base and port at Sevastopol and domination over the narrow straights into the Sea of Azov, would increase the prospect of a far more serious military conflict between Russian and NATO forces?
    How do you propose this could happen? Russia has been granted the right to use this base and port.

    Fact is that many former Warsaw Pact countries and some newly independent republics were willing to make heavy sacrifices to join the EU and NATO. They knew exactly that this is the only thing that may protect them from being reannexed by Russia some time under some pretext as now observed in Ukraine.
    "don't attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by incompetence"

  10. #785
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by Neo
    would you agree that NATO control of Crimea
    US want a large military presence in Ukraine, hence them creating the coup. Getting their grubby mitts on Sevastopol which is more than capable of holding a nuclear "encouragement" would be catastrophic for Russia and China.

  11. #786
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083


    No wonder the merkins want to destroy Russia. No GMO? But obomba's always been the monsanto pusher around the world. He must be really angry.

  12. #787
    Dislocated Member
    Neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    31-10-2021 @ 03:34 AM
    Location
    Nebuchadnezzar
    Posts
    10,609
    Quote Originally Posted by Takeovers View Post
    How do you propose this could happen? Russia has been granted the right to use this base and port.
    Right.. so Russia didn't need to annexe Crimea then..?

  13. #788
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,429
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    No wonder the merkins want to destroy Russia. No GMO?
    That Russian agriculture is so organic.

  14. #789
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:15 PM
    Posts
    15,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Neo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Takeovers View Post
    How do you propose this could happen? Russia has been granted the right to use this base and port.
    Right.. so Russia didn't need to annexe Crimea then..?
    How do you define 'need' in this context?

    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    Getting their grubby mitts on Sevastopol which is more than capable of holding a nuclear "encouragement" would be catastrophic for Russia and China.
    You are living in the past pseudo. Nuclear war is over/finished/kaput.

    The only thing on the minds of the developed powers in the modern world is how to get these weapons off the table permanently so that extremist nutters don't get the chance to use them. No developed nation will ever use nuclear weapons under any context for any purpose.

  15. #790
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Neo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Takeovers View Post
    How do you propose this could happen? Russia has been granted the right to use this base and port.
    Right.. so Russia didn't need to annexe Crimea then..?
    How do you define 'need' in this context?

    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    Getting their grubby mitts on Sevastopol which is more than capable of holding a nuclear "encouragement" would be catastrophic for Russia and China.
    You are living in the past pseudo. Nuclear war is over/finished/kaput.

    The only thing on the minds of the developed powers in the modern world is how to get these weapons off the table permanently so that extremist nutters don't get the chance to use them. No developed nation will ever use nuclear weapons under any context for any purpose.
    Umm Looper - you know that the US is about to spend $1 trillion on their latest nuclear weapon systems, right? You know this yes? Or is it "so last year" ?

    As for extremist nutters with nukes, I assume yuo mean israel with their 200+ french and US gifted Nukes that those psychos will doubtless launch sooner rather than later.

  16. #791
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:15 PM
    Posts
    15,185
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    you know that the US is about to spend $1 trillion on their latest nuclear weapon systems, right? You know this yes? Or is it "so last year" ?
    The US is developing a new nuclear weapons system? I was not aware of this. What is the name of this system?

  17. #792
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    you know that the US is about to spend $1 trillion on their latest nuclear weapon systems, right? You know this yes? Or is it "so last year" ?
    The US is developing a new nuclear weapons system? I was not aware of this. What is the name of this system?
    I think they will name it the "another obomba lie" weapons system

    PressTV-US to spend $1 trillion on nuclear arms

    Upgrading is the name of the game Looper.

    Obomba says he wants a world without nukes, and signs off to spend $1trillion on upgrading their current system. Harrytittletattle will like it as it will have a iphone power button on it, and shaped like an oscar.

    Of course you are sort of correct; the point is not to use them (unless the dollar finally crashes to its true value of being about the same as 1 ply used toilet paper), the point is to spend the money on them because his big business backers will pocket another $1 trillion dollars, and the Fed will get another $1 trillion dollar of lovely debt on the books for its owners to claw in the 6% of.

    You got nothing to say about the israelis though? Quite a campaign there to nuke Iran just on the off chance that they might pose a problem to the rogue state of israel in the future.

  18. #793
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:15 PM
    Posts
    15,185
    So no name for the new system yet. They should run a competition at the high schools to come up with a name.

    from your esteemed news source 'presstv.com'

    “Over the next thirty years, the United States plans to spend approximately $1 trillion maintaining the current arsenal
    Which works out at $33 billion a year on maintenance of the largest nuclear arsenal on the planet.

    Quite a good price I would say.

    I reckon Vladimir could have built a new Black sea port some where else on the coast for less than that.

  19. #794
    . Neverna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    21,241
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    No developed nation will ever use nuclear weapons under any context for any purpose.
    They may or may not ever be launched again but they will be used to threaten states that don't have them and don't do as they're told.

  20. #795
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    You can't trust the fucker.



  21. #796
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:15 PM
    Posts
    15,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverna View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    No developed nation will ever use nuclear weapons under any context for any purpose.
    They may or may not ever be launched again but they will be used to threaten states that don't have them and don't do as they're told.
    How can they be used as a believable threat when everybody knows that no civilised developed country will ever actually use them?

    When have they recently been used as a threat?

    They could easily usefully have been used in their tactical form for bunker busting in Afghanistan. How come they were sidelined for far less powerful conventional weapons?

  22. #797
    Dislocated Member
    Neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    31-10-2021 @ 03:34 AM
    Location
    Nebuchadnezzar
    Posts
    10,609
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Neo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Takeovers View Post
    How do you propose this could happen? Russia has been granted the right to use this base and port.
    Right.. so Russia didn't need to annexe Crimea then..?
    How do you define 'need' in this context?
    What is there to define?

    Takeovers thinks that Russia having an agreement to lease the port is as good a guarantee of continuity as required. My reply was somewhat sarcastic, hence the rolleyes.

    I can't think of many places in the world as strategically significant as the Crimea peninsula. Given the current realpolitik situation of the Ukraine, I think it was an astute move by the Russians to annexe it.

  23. #798
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:15 PM
    Posts
    15,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Neo
    I can't think of many places in the world as strategically significant as the Crimea peninsula.
    Maybe a century ago when warfare was waged using gunboats and naval blockades.

    Quote Originally Posted by Neo
    Given the current realpolitik situation of the Ukraine, I think it was an astute move by the Russians to annexe it.
    Annexation as an acceptable method of enagaging with your geographical neighbours went out of fashion a century ago.

    Civilised countries do not steal territory from their neighbours anymore.

    What century are you living in?

    The hypocrisy of the Russian flag wavers on this thread is embarrassing.

    Your heads would explode with apoplexy if the US contemplated anything vaguely similar.

  24. #799
    Dislocated Member
    Neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Online
    31-10-2021 @ 03:34 AM
    Location
    Nebuchadnezzar
    Posts
    10,609
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    The hypocrisy of the Russian flag wavers on this thread is embarrassing.
    And there it is...

  25. #800
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last Online
    25-03-2021 @ 08:47 AM
    Posts
    36,437

    Poison Control:

    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post


    No wonder the merkins want to destroy Russia. No GMO? But obomba's always been the monsanto pusher around the world. He must be really angry.

    Kind of ironic Pope Putin would bring up the poison word...(Litvinenko)...

    What is it with this poison stuff?...

    Did I read correctly that the Romans banned the use of poisoning at some point?...Heh...Bloody effective way of assuming power...

    The subtler, the better...(GMO included)...

Page 32 of 265 FirstFirst ... 2224252627282930313233343536373839404282132 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •