Thread: Contact lost with Malaysia Plane.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Search for residual intelligence in ENT's brain not thrown up any 'concrete evidence' so far.

Wellington, Nov 17 (ANI): While the search for missing Malaysia airlines flight MH370 may have yielded no results yet, the submersibles scouring ENT's brain have reportedly discovered fascinating cranial crevices and inactive neurons.....but unfortunately no indication of intelligence.

The hunt for critical or analytical ability has apparently failed to find any concrete evidence either.

Judith Zielke, chief coordinator of expat intelligence recovery efforts reportedly said in an interview that the cerebral search effort was slow and painstaking, moving at about 1 cm per hour and slowed by the sheer gunk, nicotine and and drug residue from years of self-abuse.

"It's quite amazing", he stated. "There has to be some sign of activity somewhere here for him to be operating on a day-to-day basis, but so far, tragically we've been unsuccessful".

Oh dear, and so it begins.

^^ Latrinedancer's lost the plot again.

Welcome to page 100...Valve on with the search...

Originally Posted by ENT

^^ Latrinedancer's lost the plot again.

....but you have lost your marbles although I am not sure you had them in the first place.

^ Ah,..the wannabe warrior starts again....

Flight MH370: 'Who took control of the aircraft?'

The head of the world's largest international airline believes information about missing flight MH370 is being concealed, calling into question who was in control of the doomed aircraft and the role of the Malaysian military.

Emirates chief Sir Tim Clark said an unwillingness to share intelligence was obstructing the investigation into the fate of the plane, which vanished in March with 229 people on board.

"I think we will know more if there is full transparency of everything that everybody knows. I do not believe that the information held by some is on the table," Clark said.

A previously unpublished transcript of an interview with Clark by German aviation journalist Andreas Spaeth, reveals the depth of doubt the industry veteran holds about nearly all aspects of the investigation into the disappearance of MH370.

Emirates has more of the Boeing 777, the make of MH370, in its fleet than any other airline.

Clark said his electronic engineers believe that even though the plane's Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, known as ACARS, was disabled it would still send out weak signals and remain traceable.

To even disable the system, which allows the aircraft to communicate with the base through satellite, you would have to go through multiple steps including entering the avionics bay, he said.

"That requires you to leave the flight deck and go down through a trap door in the floor to do that. But somehow this thing was disabled so much so that the ground tracking capability was eliminated."

Clark dismissed pilot suicide as a possible cause of the tragedy, saying the pilot would have ditched the plane in South China Sea rather than fly it for several more hours.

"So if he was on a suicide mission, he would have done it then. Who then took control of the aircraft? Who then knew how to disable ACARS and turn the transponder off? That is a huge challenge."

Clark also cast doubt bout the role of the Malaysian military, saying the claim that they identified MH370 as friendly when it suddenly reversed course and so took no further action was "bizarre" and needed to be "looked at very carefully".

"I know this did not have to happen, there is technology to track these aircraft and everybody will say that, Boeing or Airbus," he said.

"That is where the conundrum is of mystery, that is where we must be more forthright and candid as to what went on, it is not good enough for the Malaysian military to say: 'On a prime radar we identified it as friendly'.

"What would have happened if the aircraft would have turned back to fly into the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur? But we identified it as as 'friendly'. Friendly with intent, or friendly without intent? But what was done? These are the questions that need to be asked of the people and the entities that were involved in all of this."

An Australian-led search for the wreckage from the aircraft is currently underway in the southern Indian Ocean off the coast of Perth.

Australian Transport Safety Bureau chief commissioner Martin Dolan said he was sure he had the all information he needed to find the plane and that he was "cautiously optimistic" of success. The bureau is co-ordinating the search and recovery of the debris but the Malaysian Government is responsible for the investigation itself.

Fairfax Media sent questions to the office of the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Najib Razak, about intelligence-sharing and the tracing of MH370 on the military radar but was directed to comments he made in The Wall Street Journal in May.

In the opinion piece, Razak said Malaysia had overcome diplomatic and military sensitivities to bring 26 different countries together in the search.

He also said the aviation industry should consider changing aircraft communication systems so they can't be disabled mid-air.

"Without physical evidence, or a clear explanation for why this happened, peoples' attention has naturally focused on the authorities - and Malaysia has borne the brunt of the criticism," Razak wrote.

"In the passage of time, I believe Malaysia will be credited for doing its best under near-impossible circumstances."

A Malaysia Airlines spokeswoman also said the carrier could not comment on whether pilots were trained to disable ACARS or how many people on board the flight would have known how to stop the system, as the matter was "under investigation".

Flight MH370: 'Who took control of the aircraft?' | Stuff.co.nz

Why are you recycling that old story ENT?

Nothing new to post?

Did read something interesting on the subject a few days ago.
Seems the SAT hand shake Doppler shift can be the same if the plane went in to a holding figure 8 pattern off the west coast of Malaysia.

He is not saying this is what happened, just that the numbers would be the same.
Plane could have been waiting for dawn to try and land in KL. Power problems flying blind, no comms would make sense .

Can't believe anyone on the net of course, but it did seem possible, no hijack, no suicide, just electrical failure, get the plane out of other flight paths and wait for the light.

^^ "A previously unpublished transcript ........", according to the news source.

Originally Posted by ENT

^^ "A previously unpublished transcript ........", according to the news source.

It's still the same bollocks in the old article.

^ The fount of all knowledge himself....

Originally Posted by ENT

^ The fount of all knowledge himself....

Says the person who *constantly* reposts the same old bollocks?

Christ on a bike. This isn't a 9/11 thread you know.

The earlier article omitted referencing Clark's theory re. accessing the ACARS via a floor hatch and then immobilizing it.

Didn't a definitive report land on your desk this morning about MH370?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

^^ "A previously unpublished transcript ........", according to the news source.

It's still the same bollocks in the old article.

Clark said his electronic engineers believe that even though the plane's Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, known as ACARS, was disabled it would still send out weak signals and remain traceable.

So his engineers are spouting bollocks are they?

^ Oooooh, harrybablooba would know,.......wouldn't he?

Originally Posted by Little Chuchok

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

^^ "A previously unpublished transcript ........", according to the news source.

It's still the same bollocks in the old article.

Clark said his electronic engineers believe that even though the plane's Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, known as ACARS, was disabled it would still send out weak signals and remain traceable.

So his engineers are spouting bollocks are they?

No, he is.

How is it going to send out "weak signals" when a circuit breaker has been pulled?

How do you know that the circuit breaker was pulled, harry? Maybe the circuit breaker wasn't pulled.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Little Chuchok

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

^^ "A previously unpublished transcript ........", according to the news source.

It's still the same bollocks in the old article.

Clark said his electronic engineers believe that even though the plane's Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, known as ACARS, was disabled it would still send out weak signals and remain traceable.

So his engineers are spouting bollocks are they?

No, he is.

How is it going to send out "weak signals" when a circuit breaker has been pulled?

So his engineers lied to him?

Originally Posted by ENT

How do you know that the circuit breaker was pulled, harry? Maybe the circuit breaker wasn't pulled.

Because ACARS wasn't transmitting you dipstick.

Duh.

Originally Posted by Little Chuchok

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Little Chuchok

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

^^ "A previously unpublished transcript ........", according to the news source.

It's still the same bollocks in the old article.

Clark said his electronic engineers believe that even though the plane's Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, known as ACARS, was disabled it would still send out weak signals and remain traceable.

So his engineers are spouting bollocks are they?

No, he is.

How is it going to send out "weak signals" when a circuit breaker has been pulled?

So his engineers lied to him?

No, I think the doddery old fool doesn't understand what was said, or was simply making it up. The whole interview is a ramble.

Do you know him personally, harry?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

May have been disabled by fire; I still reckon it was all due to a fire in the nose wheel well.

If there had been a fire it wouldn't have taken more than a few seconds for the pilot to radio an alert to air traffic control, just as standard procedure in an emergency, then proceed, which is what didn't happen.

"Authorities also released an interim report, including a detailed map showing the flight's unusual route. The map suggests that the plane did not, as previously believed, follow a series of predetermined navigational waypoints, says the Daily Telegraph. Instead, it flew directly above the Strait of Malacca in a northwesterly direction and then turned again and travelled south for about seven hours before crashing in the Indian Ocean.

This route would have reduced the risk of detection by avoiding Indonesian territory, although it may have passed over the northern tip of Sumatra.

Aviation expert David Learmount told the Daily Telegraph: "It does look like the plane was trying to avoid Indonesian air space. It was an aircraft that has gone rogue. It didn't need to follow waypoints. There are no roads in the sky – pilots can go wherever they want."



Read more: MH370: Details of who was on missing plane are being withheld, says airline chief | Flight MH370 News | 2 | The Week UK

Originally Posted by ENT

Do you know him personally, harry?

Before I answer that, do you think it has any bearing on the rambling interview he gave?