The Thailand expat forum for Travel, Lifestyle and Fun.

AntRobertson

I don't know why I'm surprised, I certainly shouldn't be given the author of that statement above and his rather selective 'World' view, but I only just now checked the source for Boon Mee's little 'Muslims Under the Bed' panic state there.

A blog. Well, to be precise a blog dressed as a 'news-watch' source. One that carries such gems as: "From the dictator lovers at Reuters"; and " India Kills 7,000 Babies A Day - Because They’re Girls"

Really Boon Mee, this is stupid even for you.

keda

Had no choice, Israel 'took it' in '67, Egypt saw the silver lining and declined to have it back...Jordan cottoned on and saw the wisdom of ceding the West Bank...seems each of these nations, which btw some still believe looked affter the Pals so well prior to '67, found a way in one fell stroke not only to rid themselves of this particular problem, but also to hand it over to Israel and through her the intl community.

raycarey

that guy sure does seem to get around.

Boon Mee

Well, as mentioned before, when the suitcase nukes start really decimating London Underground, perhaps the appeasiers 'round here might get a clue?

...probably not.

__________________
ผมเป็นคนบ้านนอก

Mr Earl

It seems your historical recollection is rather selective. It was Egypt who invaded Israel in 1967.

Wallace

Mr Earl - on June 5, 1967, the Israelis launched a pre-emptive strike on the Egyptian air force and over the next few days destroyed more than 450 aircraft. The Israelis lost 19. The 6 day war ended up with Israel occupying the Sinai peninsula, the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

And you claim that Egypt invaded Israel? History being rewritten indeed. Or perhaps just not read in the first place.

__________________
The truth is out there, but then I'm stuck in here.

Boon Mee

They sure were preparing to do so despite your attempt as historical revisionism...

lom

And US invaded Iran in 2006..
Ah, sorry, sure they were preparing to do so..

Boon Mee

Newsweek: Bush is Ahmadinejad

How shocking is it to see Bush and Ahmadinejad face to face on the latest Newsweek cover?! Suddenly, Bush is the alter ego of a madman who wants Israel wiped off the map. Supplies arms to Iraqui insurgents to kill our soldiers, supplies weapons to Hezbollah in Lebanon to kill whoever, and continues progress on a nuclear program despite international condemnation.

It's also interesting to see the only the Left is just now noticing that we are at war with Iran. How many times will these minions scream "Death to America" (although they don't mean it) and kill our soldiers with their weapons before the Left notices?

Seems like it's only when the US makes a strong stance against these killers that the Left sees a smoking gun! Then they report that "Bush wants war with Iran". They really do believe that Bush is the real danger.

This is getting rather predictable...

man with no head

Bush is more dangerous...he has invaded another nation, deposed its legal government, and has countless nukes ready.

Has Iran?

raycarey

i guess you know better than gen. pace, huh?

VOA News - Top American General Disputes US Military Claim on Iran

stroller

And I was led to believe the only plans for invading Iran are in the minds of leftist bloggers...

Boon Mee

US Releases Photo Proof of Iranian Weaponry & Personnel in Iraq .

A little behind the times are ya boys!

lom

^And US release that info on a blogspot ?
Come on Booners, you can't be that daft..

raycarey

so you know better than pace, huh boonie?

Mr Earl

All Pace said was the evidence the Tehran government is giving the orders isn't conclusive.
Iranian supplied weapons and military personnel are involved.
I guess Amadinejad neglected to fax copies of his orders to the Pentagon.

man with no head

Dear God, another worthless blog.

But this tidbit is good for a laugh:

The item looks like it's been Photoshopped.

Boon Mee

Adolf Hitler or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?

"I hope it will be spring all over the world. We shy away from any kind of conflict and any kind of bloodshed, and we will be sad by such. We are opposed to any kind of conflict and as we have said repeatedly we think the world problem can be solved through the use of logic and a sense of friendship."

"It believes it has, by making a major political and actual sacrifice, laid the foundation for an end to the centuries-long conflict between these two great nations...."

"There is no need for the use of force."

"It would be a wonderful thing for all of humanity if both peoples would renounce force against each other forever. The German people are ready to make such a pledge."

"We have a very good relationship with Iraq. We are historical friends. We have intermarriages between the two nations, and millions of Iranians and Iraqis travel to each other's countries. And our position for Iraq is very clear: We are asking for peace."

"We want to do everything we can to build a true friendship with the French people... The German government has the honest desire to do everything to build good relations with the British people and their government, and to prevent a recurrence of the only war between the two nations."

"And our position for Iraq is very clear: We are asking for peace, we are asking for security, and we will be sad to see people get killed, no matter who they are. It could be Iraqis. We will be sad if we hear they are killed or anyone who is brought there by force and is put in the middle of the conflict."

"The German people has no desire to see the French suffer, nor do the French desire that for us."

"Our people have no problem with American public and we have a very friendly relationship and this friendship is so great, that I wrote a letter to the American government..."

"Neither does Germany have any difficulties with England, aside from colonial issues. There is no reason for any kind of conflict

man with no head

Another blog, ignore the link.