![]() |
|
Welcome to the TeakDoor.com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| |||||||
| Middle East Issues Topics about Iraq, Afghanistan and issues focusing on Middle East politics or its cultures. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #801 (permalink) |
| Lisu Last Online: Today 09:45 AM Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: North by Northwest
Posts: 836
| [quote=Texpat;694754] ..... Anybody going to the homecoming parade? Panda, Anty, Sabang? Wanna join me? It'll be a great time. Budweiser and hotdogs with ketchup, cheering for the brave troops and waving our beloved flag. ![]() xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx Budweiser is a poor-man's beer. .(Texpat 21 June 2008) |
| | |
| | #803 (permalink) |
| Watching the Wheels Last Online: Today 01:40 PM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: east of Pattaya
Posts: 9,045
| Bush, in a Shift, Accepts Concept of Iraq Timeline HOUSTON — President Bush agreed to “a general time horizon” for withdrawing American troops in Iraq, the White House announced Friday, in a concession that reflected both progress in stabilizing Iraq and the depth of political opposition to an open-ended military presence in Iraq and at home. Mr. Bush, who has long derided timetables for troop withdrawals as dangerous, agreed to at least a notional one as part of the administration’s efforts to negotiate the terms for an American military presence in Iraq after a United Nations mandate expires at the end of the year. The agreement, announced in coordinated statements released Friday by the White House and Prime Minister Maliki's government, reflected a significant shift in the war in Iraq. More than five years after the conflict began with the overthrow of Saddam Husseins government, the American military presence now depends significantly, if not completely, on Iraqi acquiescence. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/19/wo...th&oref=slogin Quite a shift in position- a turnaround actually. So Iraq will not be the big US middle eastern Barracks as envisaged. Oil will be the sole 'big thing' in Iraq. Then again, it always was. I wonder if the US taxpayers will now start wondering about those huge US military facilities constructed by Halliburton on no bid contracts? Or the fact that Baghdad contains the worlds largest embassy? Still, in it's recent softening of positions on Iran and Iraq, the Bush admin is finally starting to show some common sense.
__________________ To err is human. To blame someone else is politics. |
| | |
| | #804 (permalink) | |
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 10,354
| Texpat: Quote:
I don't think there will ever be a victory parade. Because the definition of victory means different things to different people. Also: equating the raising of the flag on Iwa Jima with Iraq? | |
| | |
| | #805 (permalink) |
| Watching the Wheels Last Online: Today 01:40 PM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: east of Pattaya
Posts: 9,045
| US troops should leave asap: Iraqi PM Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has been quoted saying that US troops should leave Iraq "as soon as possible". He called US presidential candidate Barack Obama's suggestion of 16 months "the right timeframe for a withdrawal". In an interview with Germany's Der Spiegel weekly, Maliki said he was not seeking to endorse the Democratic US presidential contender, but that keeping troops in Iraq for too long would cause trouble. Obama has pledged to withdraw combat troops from Iraq within 16 months if he is elected. "That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes," Maliki was quoted as saying. "Those who operate on the premise of short time periods in Iraq today are being more realistic. Artificially prolonging the tenure of US troops in Iraq would cause problems." US troops should leave asap: Iraqi PM - Breaking News - World - Breaking News |
| | |
| | #806 (permalink) | |
| ฝรั่งพูดมาก Last Online: 02-01-2009 06:58 PM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 10,212
| Al-Maliki should be careful what he wishes for. Wasn't his cabinet, a year ago when things looked grim, requesting US troops to remain well into the 20-teens? I would imagine very few US servicemen want to stay there any longer than absolutely necessary. No booze. No babes. No porn. No fun. Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #807 (permalink) | |
| Not again! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Out there!
Posts: 8,121
| Quote:
Why do you think that American soldiers join the army for fun?? or are they told by their recruiters that they are gonna have a lot of fun?? If thats the case then no wonder why that Iraqi girl was raped and her whole family burned alive.
__________________ "The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do." Samuel P. Huntington To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by machangezi : 20-07-2008 at 07:01 PM. | |
| | |
| | #808 (permalink) |
| Senior Member | If you find yourself in Fallujah with a hankerin' for some yardbird, you're in luck! Kentucky Fried Chicken Sizzles in Fallujah ![]() How 'bout that Surge, eh? ![]() Kentucky Fried Chicken Sizzles in Fallujah |
| | |
| | #811 (permalink) |
| ฝรั่งพูดมาก Last Online: 02-01-2009 06:58 PM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 10,212
| So there I was yesterday, watching the news in my living room. It appears half the Iraqi parliament seems to think a precipitous withdrawal of US troops is a good idea, the other half believe that a slower, measured exit is a much better idea. I'll leave the guns and soldiers to the militarys -- and the decisions to the politicians. But what struck me is that the democratically-elected parliament, comprised of Iraqis of all flavors, is free to make independent policy based on what is best for their country. There is no 500-pound gorilla in the room swaying others with fear and reprisal. Open disagreement does not spell the end of a career/life. The lawmakers, elected by the people, have their own future in their hands. The sun is shining on Baghdad. |
| | |
| | #812 (permalink) |
| Gone Off Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: shelf
Posts: 10,354
| It may shine. We'll have to wait and see. But yes, it may shine in the future. Thanks to over $1+ Trillion dollars of American taxpayer money. A Shiite government in Iraq, linked with Iran. Basra will even be more semi-autonomous and allied and influenced with Iran. |
| | |
| | #813 (permalink) | |
| Not again! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Out there!
Posts: 8,121
| Quote:
A good way to use U.N sanctions.... in 1972 when Iraqi oil was nationalized, American and British oil companies were thrown out while all major deals were set with companies from China, Russia, France etc etc but the dynamic duo imposed sanctions through their bitch U.N made sure that those companies won't get dick out of Iraq. When the time was right....BOOM!..... INVASION.... out goes Saddam and in comes the dynamic duo. What a fucked up world it is. | |
| | |
| | #815 (permalink) | ||
| Koh Phangan Last Online: 03-01-2009 05:48 PM Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: The thin ice of modern life.
Posts: 634
| Quote:
And how many Iraqi civillians lives did it cost for the US corporations to get what they wanted? Nobody really knows do they, because they weren't considered important enough to be counted. How about a guess... 250,000? 750,000? more? And all that depleted uranium form spent munitions.. looks like the death toll isn't going to be stopping any time soon. It's a dog eat dog world in big business.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | ||
| | |
| | #816 (permalink) | ||
| Elite Member Last Online: Today 01:27 PM Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,388
| Quote:
If the US and its cronies pull out of Iraq the present Shia led government would need some assistance from Iranian Shia allies to control the country. Saddam Hussein brought some order and relative peace to Iraq by ruling with a brutal iron fist. Any future government of Iraq would have to do the same to avoid ongoing civil war. The Iraq government has a choice of allies to call on for the military muscle to subdue the powerful opposing ethnic factions. They can go with the USA and roll over to become puppets while their countries wealth is siphoned off, or they can go with Iran and maintain their autonomy. This is quite obviously the reason the US is reluctant to pull out. If they quit now, its all been for shit and back to square one or worse, (although Iraq would be much better off without them in the long run). The present government in Iraq is clearly strengthening ties with Iran while at the same time resisting political, military and economic domination by USA. There isn't room in Iraq for both USA and Iran. The true liberators of Iraq may well end up being Iran. Last edited by Panda : 03-08-2008 at 09:11 AM. | ||
| | |
| | #817 (permalink) | |
| Watching the Wheels Last Online: Today 01:40 PM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: east of Pattaya
Posts: 9,045
| Quote:
| |
| | |