The Thailand Forum

The Thailand expat forum for Travel, Lifestyle and Fun.


Welcome to the TeakDoor.com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Forum Home Donate Arcade Chat Room Gallery Blog Mark Forums Read
Go Back   TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum > Banal Banter > Issues > Middle East Issues
Home Register TD Links FAQ Members List Calendar Weather Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Middle East Issues Topics about Iraq, Afghanistan and issues focusing on Middle East politics or its cultures.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21-11-2007, 11:51 PM   #21 (permalink)
Texpat
ฝรั่งพูดมาก
 
Texpat's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 01:21 PM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,788
Texpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the net
^I read that story three times and nowhere does it indicate anybody ever denied anything. Can you clarify please?
Texpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2007, 12:07 AM   #22 (permalink)
Mid
Nautical Member
 
Mid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,881
Mid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the net
Quote:
nowhere does it indicate anybody ever denied anything
grant you that on semantics , my bad

my point was that nobody was screaming bloddy murder ,

and no doubt would have been even happier if we ( the great unwashed ) remained ignorant ....................
Mid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2007, 12:14 AM   #23 (permalink)
Texpat
ฝรั่งพูดมาก
 
Texpat's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 01:21 PM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,788
Texpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the net
Yes, big faux pas.
A major command 4-star lost his job along with several others mentioned.
Rightly so.

Still the notion of the USAF secretly slipping into (anywhere) and launching a nuke without the entire world taking notice is preposterous.
Texpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2007, 08:13 AM   #24 (permalink)
mrsquirrel
Elite Member
 
mrsquirrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In a rather cold and dark place
Posts: 10,512
mrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the netmrsquirrel User spends way too much time on the net
It is perfectly feasible that the US engineered it so that Israel acted as a distraction (knowingly or not) and snuck and bombed the Syrian facility.

They don't have to tell anybody else about it. Not the UK, Russia, China etc.
mrsquirrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2007, 08:47 AM   #25 (permalink)
keda
Senior Member
 
keda's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 01:50 PM
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,675
keda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the netkeda User spends way too much time on the net
Send a message via MSN to keda
If a tactical nuke was used believe it the world would know and most of it would be squealing.
keda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2007, 09:21 AM   #26 (permalink)
Ivor Biggun
Elite Member
 
Last Online: 28-09-2008 10:23 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Buriram Province out in the sticks
Posts: 1,918
Ivor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forumsIvor Biggun User is well thought of on Thailand travel forums
Send a message via AIM to Ivor Biggun
Donor
Why use US pilots ? If shot down they would be propaganda fodder for Syria. I don't see it as being logical. Also it would be more logical to use a Cruise missile. Also due to the fact they hit the target makes me more convinced they weren't US pilots.
Ivor Biggun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2007, 10:56 AM   #27 (permalink)
Whiteshiva
Elite Member
 
Whiteshiva's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 02:12 PM
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nontaburi
Posts: 3,802
Whiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the netWhiteshiva User spends way too much time on the net
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mid View Post
Suspected Syrian Nuclear Site Dismantled?
By PAMELA HESS Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON Oct 25, 2007 (AP)

Satellite images said to suggest facility removed after Israeli airstrike


RIGHT: This is a satellite image of Syria collected on October 24, 2007. The area was believed to be the site of a partly built nuclear reactor until it was suspected to be attacked by Israeli forces in September and later covered up.
It doesn't look like a nuclear reactor site to me. For a start, I have never seen a square nuclear reactor building, although I guess a square shell could be build around it to confuse aerial surveillance. But where are the cooling towers? Nuclear reactors need large amounts of water, and although there may have been water pumped up form aquifers below the desert, it would still have to be stored, cooled and disposed of somewhere.

Also it appears the facility bombed was located at the top of a mountain or hill - definitely not the place to build a nuclear reactor.
__________________
Any error in tact, fact or spelling is purely due to transmissional errors...
Whiteshiva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2007, 08:51 PM   #28 (permalink)
Mid
Nautical Member
 
Mid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,881
Mid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the net
By Gareth Porter
Nov 21, 2007


WASHINGTON - Until late October, the accepted explanation about the September 6 Israeli air strike in Syria, constructed from a series of press leaks from US officials, was that it was prompted by dramatic satellite intelligence that Syria was building a nuclear facility with help from North Korea.

snip

On October 7, Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who enjoys access to top administration officials, quoted an unnamed official as providing the official explanation for the Israeli attack as targeting "nuclear materials supplied to Syria by North Korea".

But then, without quoting the official directly, Ignatius reported the official's description of the raid's implicit message: "[T]he message to Iran is clear: America and Israel can identify nuclear targets and penetrate air defenses to destroy them."

The official's suggestion that the strike was a joint US-Israeli message about a joint policy toward striking Iran's nuclear sites was the clearest indication that the primary objective of the strike was to intimidate Iran at a time when both Israel and the Cheney faction of the Bush administration were finding it increasingly difficult to do so.

Gareth Porter is an investigative historian and journalist specializing in US national security policy. His latest book, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam, was published in June 2005.

atimes.com
__________________
"Keeping quiet while monks and other peaceful protesters are murdered and jailed is not evidence of constructive engagement." - Arvind Ganesan, Human Rights Watch.

"I think...I think it's in my basement. Let me go upstairs and check" - M.C. Escher
Mid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 10:34 AM   #29 (permalink)
Mid
Nautical Member
 
Mid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,881
Mid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the net
Pyongyang-Syria link
Today's Top Stories

Washington - North Korea helped Syria build a secret nuclear reactor "not intended for peaceful purposes" before it was destroyed last year by an Israeli air strike, the White House said Thursday.

"We are convinced, based on a variety of information, that North Korea assisted Syria's covert nuclear activities," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said in a statement.

Syria broke international agreements by hiding the reactor from the UN nuclear watchdog, known as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and sought to cover up the plutonium producing facility after Israeli warplanes struck it September 6, Perino said.

"This cover-up only served to reinforce our confidence that this reactor was not intended for peaceful activities," Perino said, adding that the facility located in Syria's eastern desert was not configured for peaceful purposes.
For Monday Bangkok Post editorial A uniting of world rogues on the North Korea-Burma link, click here.

The White House released the statement after US intelligence officials briefed members of Congress on the evidence of Syria's nuclear work and North Korea's proliferating role. The statement marked the first time the Bush administration has publicly revealed its suspicions about the site.

Six Senate and House committees received evidence "that outlines a very compelling case to show that there was in fact a Syrian effort with North Korean assistance to build a covert nuclear reactor," a US official said on the condition of anonymity.

The facility was not yet operational but "there were clear indications that that would happen at some point," the official added.

The Syrian ambassador to Washington, Imad Moustapha, appeared on CNN shortly after the White House statement to denounce it and questioned the veracity of US intelligence following the false claims that Saddam Hussein's regime had weapons of mass destruction.

"I hope the American citizens ... would not be as gullible this time as they were prior to the war in Iraq," Moustapha said.

Moustapha said the site hit by Israel was an unused military building that was left unguarded and called the allegations "silly" and "ridiculous."

"There was nobody at that site. It was a vacant military building. No security guards. No barbed wires. No anti-aircraft missiles," he said.

Perino said the United States was briefing the IAEA on the intelligence and called on Damascus to "come clean before the world regarding its illicit nuclear activities."

Syria's support for terrorism and meddling in Lebanon coupled with its nuclear ambitions raised the threat to international security, Perino said.

"The construction of this reactor was a dangerous and potentially destabilizing development for the region and the world," Perino said.

"This is particularly true because it was done covertly and in violation of the very procedures designed to reassure the world of the peaceful intent of nuclear activities," she added.

Moustapha said the United States should invade Israel because the Jewish state is the only country in the region with nuclear weapons. Israel has never acknowledged that it has nuclear weapons, but it is widely believed to possess about 200 bombs.

Perino said the United States will continue to pressure North Korea to end nuclear proliferation under the disarmament agreement reached in six-nation talks in February 2007.

The Bush administration wants North Korea to acknowledge US concerns about the Syria connection in a declaration Pyongyang must produce under the agreement detailing all of its nuclear activities. North Korea claims it did so in November, but Washington believes the disclose was incomplete because it did not address Syria or US suspicions North Korea had enriched uranium in addition to producing plutonium.

The White House did not confirm a Washington Post report that among the evidence is a video that shows North Koreans present at the Syrian facility.

"We have long been seriously concerned about North Korea's nuclear weapons programme and its proliferation activities," Perino said. "North Korea's clandestine nuclear cooperation with Syria is a dangerous manifestation of those activities."

The United States would work within the six-nation talks that also include China, Japan, Russia and South Korea to ensure that a "rigorous verification mechanism" is in place to test the reliability of Pyongyang declaration once it has been submitted, she said. Under the agreement, North Korea was to provide the document by the end of December and the issue has stalled the six-nation negotiations.

The United States has pledged to take steps to remove North Korea from the State Department's list of state sponsors of terrorism and ease sanctions in return for the declaration.

The CIA presented the evidence to the House and Senate intelligence, military and foreign relations committees. (dpa)

bangkokpost.net
Mid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 04:49 PM   #30 (permalink)
machangezi
Not again!
 
machangezi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Out there!
Posts: 8,119
machangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the net
According to the reports, American reports I must say, there wasn't a single person in the facility when it came under attack. It makes me wonder what kind of nuclear facility was that? Not a single guard and not a single person inside?
machangezi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 04:56 PM   #31 (permalink)
Texpat
ฝรั่งพูดมาก
 
Texpat's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 01:21 PM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,788
Texpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the net
Hehehe.

Think a new thread is warranted -- or does this threadhead still apply?

Sure the OP doesn't want to add the nuclear angle?

I'm guessing it was a baby milk factory.
Texpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 05:04 PM   #32 (permalink)
good2bhappy
Senior Member
 
good2bhappy's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 03:44 PM
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Klong Samwa
Posts: 5,324
good2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the netgood2bhappy User spends way too much time on the net
looks like Noah's Ark.
Before and after the antique robbers got there.
good2bhappy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 05:09 PM   #33 (permalink)
machangezi
Not again!
 
machangezi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Out there!
Posts: 8,119
machangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the netmachangezi User spends way too much time on the net
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texpat View Post
Hehehe.

Think a new thread is warranted -- or does this threadhead still apply?

Sure the OP doesn't want to add the nuclear angle?

I'm guessing it was a baby milk factory.
Yeah a baby milk factory wouldn't have personnel to guard it, American sailorboy.
machangezi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 05:15 PM   #34 (permalink)
Mid
Nautical Member
 
Mid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,881
Mid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the net
Syria denies N Korea nuclear link
UPDATED ON:
FRIDAY, APRIL 25, 2008
6:37 MECCA TIME, 3:37 GMT


The US released pictures of the alleged facility
to back up its claims
[Reuters]

Syria's ambassador to the US has dismissed the White House's claim that North Korea had helped it build a nuclear reactor as a "ridiculous story".

Imad Moustapha told Al Jazeera that his government maintained there was no evidence of any alleged secret nuclear activity.

If there had been a nuclear reactor, there would have been security such as anti-aircraft weapons and guards there, Moustapha said.

The Bush administration has said North Korea helped Syria to build an alleged nuclear reactor destroyed in a controversial Israeli air raid last year.

'Come clean'

The White House said in a statement on Thursday that Syria "must come clean" over its alleged secret co-operation with North Korea on the reactor.

It also described the alleged assistance as a "dangerous manifestation'' of North Korea's nuclear proliferation activities, but said it would continue six-party talks to try to resolve the nuclear standoff with the isolated nation.

"We are convinced, based on a variety of information, that North Korea assisted Syria's covert nuclear activities," Dana Perino, a White House spokeswoman, said.


"We have good reason to believe that reactor, which was damaged beyond repair on September 6 of last year, was not intended for peaceful purposes."

The claims follow a briefing of US congressional officials in Washington DC by intelligence chiefs, including William Hayden, the CIA director.

Before the briefing, Syria's ambassador to the UK, Sami al-Khiyami, said that co-operation between the two countries was mainly economic and had "nothing" to do with building such a facility.

However some US legislators earlier warned that the claims could wreck vital six-party talks on North Korea's nuclear programme.

'Nuclear facility'

The controversy began last September, when an Israeli air raid destroyed a target in Syrian territory which some reports later said was a nuclear facility being built with North Korean help.

Syria, a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), has maintained in the past that the site was an unused military facility.

It later razed the site and built a larger building in its place.

The target of Israel's raid has been veiled in secrecy, with US intelligence and government officials refusing to confirm for months that such a raid even took place.


Israel destroyed the building in a raid in
September last year
[Reuters]

A document released by US intelligence officials on Thursday said that the administration had concluded that the suspected reactor would have been able to produce plutonium for nuclear bombs and was "nearing operational capability in August 2007".

The US did not give Israel any "green light" to attack the Syrian site, a US official said.

Senior US intelligence officials said the suspected reactor closely resembled the Yongbyon nuclear facility in North Korea, which tested a nuclear device in October 2006.

In the briefings to congress and reporters, US officials produced before-and-after aerial photographs of the suspected reactor in eastern Syria as well as detailed interior images that they said showed key parts of its components.

One photograph showed what a US intelligence official said was a senior North Korean nuclear expert standing beside a Syrian atomic official inside Syria.

Sensitive timing

Joseph Cirincione, an expert on nuclear proliferation, told Al Jazeera on Thursday that North Korea rather than Syria was the target of the briefing, as "very few officials ... are actually worried that Syria had then or does have now a programme that would threaten the US and Israel".

"There are conservatives in the US who don't like the terms of the deal the US has worked out, they think it's a little too weak," he said.

"There are others, such as the neo-conservatives Dick Cheney, John Bolton ... who don't like any agreement and who don't want to set a precedent of negotiating with a tyrannical regime [North Korea] for fear that it would set a precedent for the US negotiating with Iran."

In addition to the US briefing, John Rood, acting under secretary for arms control and international security, briefed Mohamed El Baradei, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), about the details being presented to Congress, US officials told AFP news agency.

The allegations of Syrian-North Korean nuclear co-operation come at a sensitive time for Pyongyang, which reached agreement over its nuclear weapons programme last year in six-party talks with the US, China, Japan, South Korea and Russia.

On Tuesday, a delegation of US nuclear experts travelled to North Korea for talks with senior officials on the nuclear issue and are expected to report back to Washington on Friday.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
english.aljazeera.net
Mid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 05:22 PM   #35 (permalink)
Texpat
ฝรั่งพูดมาก
 
Texpat's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 01:21 PM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,788
Texpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the net
No sailor in my blood matzah-Ghezzi.
And this thread is as wrong as two boys kissin'.
Arencha disappointed?
Texpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 06:06 PM   #36 (permalink)
Norton
Born Again Pagan
 
Norton's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 03:30 PM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Roiet
Posts: 7,246
Norton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the netNorton User spends way too much time on the net
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texpat
Think a new thread is warranted -- or does this threadhead still apply?
If a new thread was to be started based on the title it should have been done around post number 4. The USAF did not bomb the facility this is quite clear.

The Israeli's have now admitted bombing the facility based on intel from US claiming it was a nuclear reactor with the potential for production of nuclear weapons grade material.

IMO, I would rather see a new thread starting from post #29.
__________________
Eat right, exercise daily, live clean, die anyway.
Norton is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 06:19 PM   #37 (permalink)
Texpat
ฝรั่งพูดมาก
 
Texpat's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 01:21 PM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,788
Texpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the netTexpat User spends way too much time on the net
Nah, much more inflammatory as it is.

Circle the wagons boys! Merika bombed another innocent country jus trying to feed its babies!
Texpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 06:23 PM   #38 (permalink)
Mid
Nautical Member
 
Mid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,881
Mid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the netMid User spends way too much time on the net
forgive me gentlemen BUT there is a common theme is there not ?

ps even got pic's
Mid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2008, 06:29 PM   #39 (permalink)
Norton
Born Again Pagan
 
Norton's Avatar