Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 156
  1. #76
    Somewhere Travelling
    man with no head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    21-10-2012 @ 07:09 PM
    Posts
    4,833
    Sorry, but, it's not smoke and mirrors. Prominent Israelis are already lobbying the U.S. to attack Iran to protect Israel:

    http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/Art...346275,00.html

    President Bush lacks the political power to attack Iran.

    As an American strike in Iran is essential for our existence...

    ...we must help him pave the way by lobbying the Democratic Party (which is conducting itself foolishly) and US newspaper editors. We need to do this in order to turn the Iranian issue to a bipartisan one and unrelated to the Iraq failure.

    We must turn to Hillary Clinton and other potential presidential candidates in the Democratic Party so that they publicly support immediate action by Bush against Iran. We should also approach European countries so that they support American actions in Iran, so that Bush will not be isolated in the international arena again.

    We must clandestinely cooperate with Saudi Arabia so that it also persuades the US to strike Iran. For our part, we must prepare an independent military strike by coordinating flights in Iraqi airspace with the US. We should also coordinate with Azerbaijan the use of airbases in its territory and also enlist the support of the Azeri minority in Iran. In addition, we must immediately start preparing for an Iranian response to an attack.
    It would be an unprecendented disaster to support Israel by attacking another nation for Israel and alienate the rest of the world in the process.

    We simply cannot and we simply must not do this, otherwise, Americans will face eternal 9/11s. And for what good reason? Do we sacrifice a nation of 300,000,000 just to protect 6,000,000? I think not.
    Last edited by man with no head; 18-02-2007 at 02:56 AM.

  2. #77
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    .

    We simply cannot and we simply must not do this, otherwise, Americans will face eternal 9/11s. And for what good reason?
    This line of 'thinking' would have had all of Europe speaking German - no D-Day - can't risk it! No battle of Midway - might as well bend over and be nice little appeasing pacifists.
    Sooner we take out the mad mullhas in I-ran, the better...

  3. #78
    Somewhere Travelling
    man with no head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    21-10-2012 @ 07:09 PM
    Posts
    4,833
    There's no appeasement here. It it simply not in our best interest to defend them.

    We should sacrifice the well-being of a nation of 300,000,000 to defend a nation of 6,000,000? Jesus Chocolate Christ how liberal can you possibly get Booner?

  4. #79
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    There's no appeasement here. It it simply not in our best interest to defend them.

    We should sacrifice the well-being of a nation of 300,000,000 to defend a nation of 6,000,000? Jesus Chocolate Christ how liberal can you possibly get Booner?
    These asshole hate us anyway. By further appeasment we are doomed far worse than if we don't go in and 'clean house'...

  5. #80
    Somewhere Travelling
    man with no head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    21-10-2012 @ 07:09 PM
    Posts
    4,833
    The Chinese and Russians hate us too! They have long range nuclear missiles pointed at us. Let's bomb them and clean them out too!

    So they hate us, so what?

    That's even more reason to stay the hell out and become energy self-sufficient like we once were before we started meddling in the Middle East through our immoral actions beginning in 1953.

  6. #81
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    The Chinese and Russians hate us too! They have long range nuclear missiles pointed at us. Let's bomb them and clean them out too!

    So they hate us, so what?

    That's even more reason to stay the hell out and become energy self-sufficient like we once were before we started meddling in the Middle East through our immoral actions beginning in 1953.
    We still need the oil?

  7. #82
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Why Iranian Bombs Are Labled in English

    Why does Iranian TNT have markings in Farsi and the other rounds seem to be labled in English?
    Since Iran sells munitions on the international market...

  8. #83
    Somewhere Travelling
    man with no head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    21-10-2012 @ 07:09 PM
    Posts
    4,833
    ....meaning, then, anyone on the international market could have bought them and then taken them to Iraq....including the U.S.?

    Question is: why would Iranian operatives use munitions written in English?

    And about that oil: shame we allow auto manufacturers to keep selling gas guzzlers if getting that oil puts our nation at risk.

  9. #84
    Thailand Expat
    keda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Last Online
    17-12-2010 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    9,831
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    Sorry, but, it's not smoke and mirrors. Prominent Israelis are already lobbying the U.S. to attack Iran to protect Israel:

    http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/Art...346275,00.html
    Thanks for the link, which quite obviously means America is going to invade Iran, and that this will be done in order to protect those vile 6 million Israelis.

    You really are a heartless cad, uncaring for the more than a million of your buddies living in Israel and enjoying superior rights and freedoms over their brethren under Islamic rule.

  10. #85
    Thailand Expat
    keda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Last Online
    17-12-2010 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    9,831
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    There's no appeasement here. It it simply not in our best interest to defend them.

    We should sacrifice the well-being of a nation of 300,000,000 to defend a nation of 6,000,000? Jesus Chocolate Christ how liberal can you possibly get Booner?
    Been through this once before...Israel is deleted, and in order to appease the likeminded masses, whilst we're at it let's also end the root cause of global Islamic terror by ridding the world once and for all of every last Jew.

    Now, would that satisfy you? More importantly, would that satisfy the Islamic extremes, and could you or anybody you know guarantee that Islamic terror will as of that moment cease to exist, or will it resume after a self-congratulatory pause, under a different guise...how about something like, the infidel waited too long to do away with Israel and must be punished, Allah commands?

  11. #86
    Thailand Expat
    keda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Last Online
    17-12-2010 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    9,831
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    The Chinese and Russians hate us too! They have long range nuclear missiles pointed at us. Let's bomb them and clean them out too!

    So they hate us, so what?

    That's even more reason to stay the hell out and become energy self-sufficient like we once were before we started meddling in the Middle East through our immoral actions beginning in 1953.
    The Chinese and Russians knew we had the same deterent, they also knew that they themselves would be destroyed in the process, and the survival instinct kicked in to create a measure of stable hostility. Islamic extremists, otoh, view the threat of global annihilation with relish.

    Slight difference there, or did it need to be pointed out?


    You got the last bit right, though it's going to take time before we advance to total self-sufficiency in regard to energy, after which gloves will hopefully come off to effectively address Allah's finest.
    Last edited by keda; 18-02-2007 at 09:01 AM. Reason: typo

  12. #87
    Thailand Expat
    keda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Last Online
    17-12-2010 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    9,831
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    ....meaning, then, anyone on the international market could have bought them and then taken them to Iraq....including the U.S.?

    Question is: why would Iranian operatives use munitions written in English?

    And about that oil: shame we allow auto manufacturers to keep selling gas guzzlers if getting that oil puts our nation at risk.
    Only a matter of time, surasak, jai yen yen...alternative and replenishible fuel sources will be developed in good time; it won't be tomorrow or even next week, but one thing for sure is that it will happen.

  13. #88
    Thailand Expat stroller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-03-2019 @ 09:53 AM
    Location
    out of range
    Posts
    23,025
    Quote Originally Posted by keda
    Islamic extremists, otoh, view the threat of global annihilation with relish.
    I somehow doubt this. A few suicide bombers don't make a communal deathwish. I don't like the tunes coming out of Iran, either, but if it's just macho posing, who knows? They don't have the capability to act on what their mouths spout.

    Terrorists getting their hands on nukes is a very serious and real possibility, but it doesn't depend on Iran developing their enrichment program.

  14. #89
    Member
    KID's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    11-12-2016 @ 01:46 AM
    Posts
    888
    hopefully the young generation in Iran will finally take the reigns and put the old timers and their extremist way of thinking to rest !!!

  15. #90
    Thailand Expat
    keda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Last Online
    17-12-2010 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    9,831
    The future may well be in their hands...crumbs!

  16. #91
    Member
    KID's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    11-12-2016 @ 01:46 AM
    Posts
    888
    it was not long ago that the younger generation ( which greatly out numbers the aging generation ) was mostly pro western views !!!

  17. #92
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Quote Originally Posted by Boon Mee View Post
    This line of 'thinking' would have had all of Europe speaking German - no D-Day - can't risk it! No battle of Midway - might as well bend over and be nice little appeasing pacifists.
    Have you ever experienced combat?

    1 out of 4 didn't make it on D-Day.


    In recent years I have come to believe that the U.S. became so involved in WWII because it would become a superpower, which is what happened.

    But I also understand the looming spectar of a USSR with power was a possible reason, among many.
    Last edited by barbaro; 18-02-2007 at 12:44 PM.
    ............

  18. #93
    I'm in Jail
    Mr Earl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    23-08-2021 @ 06:47 PM
    Location
    In the Jungle of Love
    Posts
    14,769
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    It's pathetic that some people still haven't gotten over the 1979 embassy siege (which was, after all, payback for the U.S. overthrowing a democratic govenment in 1953).

    It's like the child threatening to burn down the house because the parent punished him for throwing the cookie jar down on the floor.

    Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the USA still hasn't renewed diplomatic relations with Tehran.

    The invasion of a sovereign embassy is an act of war. Too bad Jimmy Carter didn't have balls back then when definitive action was called for.
    We probably wouldn't be in the current mess had we stomped the extremists back then.

  19. #94
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    [quote=Mr Earl;258464]
    Quote Originally Posted by surasak View Post
    It's pathetic that some people still haven't gotten over the 1979 embassy siege (which was, after all, payback for the U.S. overthrowing a democratic govenment in 1953).

    It's like the child threatening to burn down the house because the parent punished him for throwing the cookie jar down on the floor.

    Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the USA still hasn't renewed diplomatic relations with Tehran.
    Yes, I believe this is correct. (And, welcome back to the board, KID.)

    The invasion of a sovereign embassy is an act of war. Too bad Jimmy Carter didn't have balls back then when definitive action was called for. We probably wouldn't be in the current mess had we stomped the extremists back then.
    The Tehran embassy siege has nothing to do with the "extremists" of today.

    Iran had a revolution and deposed the Shah. The Shah was put in place by the U.S. after the CIA overthrew a democratically elected President that was anti-communist.

    Why?

    Because of the oil companies.

    As for doing anything against Iran military, this was in 1979-81. The military was hollow and it was very soon after a particular debacle.

    Iran is a big country. With a large population. With rugged terrain. With Farsi speakers.

    It would not have bee possible.

  20. #95
    Thailand Expat
    RandomChances's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    03-03-2023 @ 03:37 PM
    Location
    Riyadh
    Posts
    2,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman
    As for doing anything against Iran military, this was in 1979-81. The military was hollow and it was very soon after a particular debacle.
    Yep, the American military had nowhere near the capability to do anythin in Iran at the time. Even today it would be a tough nut to crack, undoubtedly the US would prevail given the politaical will, but it would be very costly in terms of both men and equipment.

    The terrain is very rugged and not idealy suited to tanks, they'd either close off the persian gulf using mines (the west still has relitivly few mine hunters) or they'd just let their 3 kilo class subs sit on the floor waiting for a US carrier to show up. I very much doubt the the US would risk a carrier there, the Caspian sea is out, so that really knocks your carriers out of the game or at least severly hampers them. Tomahawk stock are very much depleted and at about a million a throw blood expensive as well. To take and hold any ground there you will need men and lots of them are going to die in probaly unacceptable numbers.
    I have more than the average number of arm and legs

  21. #96
    Somewhere Travelling
    man with no head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    21-10-2012 @ 07:09 PM
    Posts
    4,833
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Earl View Post

    The invasion of a sovereign embassy is an act of war. Too bad Jimmy Carter didn't have balls back then when definitive action was called for.
    We probably wouldn't be in the current mess had we stomped the extremists back then.
    Is overthrowing a democratic government an act of war?

    How about bombing an embassy?

  22. #97
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Yep, the American military had nowhere near the capability to do anythin in Iran at the time. Even today it would be a tough nut to crack, undoubtedly the US would prevail given the politaical will, but it would be very costly in terms of both men and equipment.
    There is not the political will necessary.

  23. #98
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Boon Mee View Post
    This line of 'thinking' would have had all of Europe speaking German - no D-Day - can't risk it! No battle of Midway - might as well bend over and be nice little appeasing pacifists.
    Have you ever experienced combat?
    Yes.

  24. #99
    Member
    KID's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    11-12-2016 @ 01:46 AM
    Posts
    888
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman View Post
    Yep, the American military had nowhere near the capability to do anything in Iran at the time. Even today it would be a tough nut to crack, undoubtedly the US would prevail given the political will, but it would be very costly in terms of both men and equipment.
    There is not the political will necessary.

    The American people never wanted a war, It was forced upon us by the Muslim extremist's

    The American haters can scream OIL,OIL,OIL all they want but we All know the truth--Iraq was suppose to be a foot hold in the middle east to show the rest of the countries that democracy can be achieved for them---IF THEY WANT IT !!!! APPARENTLY THEY DON'T

    The funny thing about this situation is that AMERICA is hated because of our belief that people should have the right to worship in the religion that they choose-- including ISLAM, but because Allah says that anyone who worships a god other than him should be converted or killed that makes AMERICA the biggest TARGET of all because of our belief in religious freedom !!

    Can Muslims and other religions coexist in the same country??? Seems to be working just fine here in the states for now -- AS LONG AS THE MUSLIMS ARE THE MINORITY RELIGION

    But what happens when the Muslims are the majority religion or believe they have the political means to force their RELIGIOUS BELIEFS on others????

    TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING IN FRANCE AND THE U.K. FOR THAT EXAMPLE !!

    As a side note to STROKER-- I don't have a problem with anyone worshiping their religion of choice, as long as the don't try and force it on others !!! I do believe in democracy, and the right of every person on the face of the earth to have a say in what their personal freedoms should be !!-- even woman and the minority religions of the country !!!

  25. #100
    Thailand Expat Boon Mee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    13-09-2019 @ 04:18 PM
    Location
    Samui
    Posts
    44,704
    Quote Originally Posted by KID View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman View Post
    Yep, the American military had nowhere near the capability to do anything in Iran at the time. Even today it would be a tough nut to crack, undoubtedly the US would prevail given the political will, but it would be very costly in terms of both men and equipment.
    There is not the political will necessary.
    The American people never wanted a war, It was forced upon us by the Muslim extremist's
    Won't convince those appeasiers and pacifists aboard here of that fact.
    According to the 'line', it was Dubya's fault all the way...

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •