![]() |
|
Welcome to the TeakDoor.com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| |||||||
| Issues There is much going on in the world and the opportunity to discuss these issues and how they affect your world is always relevant. Your opinion is important and though we might not solve the problems confronting society, we just might open someones eyes. What is your opinion? |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #161 (permalink) | ||
| Elite Member Last Online: Today 04:36 PM Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Nontaburi
Posts: 3,802
| Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #162 (permalink) | ||
| Clingin' on... Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BKK
Posts: 3,998
| Quote:
Butterfly claimed that demand for oil from from China and India was 'imaginary'. I then posted data, with citations, showing him that it was real. He has not addressed this, save from saying that the citations were 'loonies'. Butterfly claimed that production was rising in tandem with demand. I then posted data, with citations, showing that during the period of price rises (2004-date), it had actually fallen. He has not adressed this, save from saying that the citations were 'loonies'. Butterfly admitted that he was 100% out on his basic maths calculations on supply. He then said he wasn't, then he said that it didn't matter anyway. When shown to be wrong by many on the thread, Butterfly has simply ranted, insulted, thrown reds around and changed the subject at every turn.
__________________ The future of TeakDoor: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. A funny thing happened today - Ant trolls, stalks, prevokes and generally upsets approximately 15 members of the board, yet Noodles goes to jail. Perhaps it was a dream... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | ||
| | |
| | #163 (permalink) | |
| Suspended Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,629
| ^ ![]() You are a fraud, claim victory when you are exposed, then repeat the same "misconceptions" over and over again until everyone forgets about your flawed assumptions Quote:
he only needs to refer to my earlier posts, learn, google, whatever and sees how wrong he was. But he won't, prefer to claim some "imaginary" victory | |
| | |
| | #164 (permalink) | ||
| Clingin' on... Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BKK
Posts: 3,998
| Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #165 (permalink) | |||
| Elite Member Last Online: Today 04:36 PM Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Nontaburi
Posts: 3,802
| Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| | |
| | #166 (permalink) |
| Suspended Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,629
| ^^ you are a complete psycho, bkka, I answered all your "allegations" before, you kept ignoring them because it deconstructed your arguments, so instead you claim some kind of imaginary victory, state things I didn't say to make your points and keep going in silly circles. Wash, Rinse, Repeat. you remind me of Boon Mee and the other right wing loonies when talking politics. No substance, no arguments, all feelings, and hearsay, anyway, go back to my posts all the answers are there or you can keep jerking off claiming you are right, I am wrong, and you are a 20year veteran in the business while posting from an Internet cafe somewhere on Rakamuang road. |
| | |
| | #167 (permalink) |
| Clingin' on... Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BKK
Posts: 3,998
| ^Can you point to a single post you have made specifically rebutting the following: The data, with citations, showing that demand from India and China was real. You previously described it as 'imaginary'. The data, with citations, showing that oil production had fallen from 2004-2007. You previously described production 'increasing at the same rate'. If you cannot, you have been shown to be wrong on the damand side and the supply side. You can't really get more wrong than that in economics. |
| | |
| | #169 (permalink) | |
| Clingin' on... Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BKK
Posts: 3,998
| Quote:
No its not, you haven't responded to any of the points made, which is why I did a resume. If you are certain I am wrong on this, why not provide a link the relevant post? | |
| | |
| | #171 (permalink) | |
| Clingin' on... Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BKK
Posts: 3,998
| Quote:
Admit defeat gracefully and then people won't think you are a dick. Wrong, but not a dick. | |
| | |
| | #172 (permalink) | |
| Suspended Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,629
| Quote:
try harder boy, Like I said, you kept ignoring things and claim victory you are probably trolling anyway, you can't be that stupid or going in circles like this without being a complete psycho, and I am a sucker for following you in your little trolling games | |
| | |
| | #173 (permalink) | ||||||
| Suspended Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,629
| Ok to end that silly troll, a quick recap for the retards, it's a slow day Fiction: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||||
| | |
| | #174 (permalink) | |||
| Clingin' on... Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BKK
Posts: 3,998
| Quote:
Chinese car ownership 1990 - 1 million. Source: Individual Car Ownership Surging in China Chinese car ownership 2000 - 16.0891 million; 2001 - 18.0204 million; 2002 - 20.5317 million. Source: Demand for automobiles to maintain rapid, steady growth (hktdc.com) Chinese car ownership esimated in 2005 - 30 million. Source: Facts & Figures of Chinese Auto Industry -- Beijing Review Chinese car ownership in 2007 - 56.97 million. Source: Car Ownership up 32% in 2007 at China Car Times According to CSMWorldwide, an American market analysis firm, China’s auto output would surpass 6 million units in 2008; China would replace Germany as the world’s third largest auto manufacturer in 2006; and by 2015, China may transcend Japan to become the second largest auto power. Source: Facts & Figures of Chinese Auto Industry -- Beijing Review I originally posted it here: http://teakdoor.com/issues/31530-oil...tml#post696001 (Oil Tumbles as Signs of Slowing Economy Spur Commodity Selling) So are the cars 'real' or 'imaginary'? Will they produce 'real' or 'imaginary' demand for oil? | |||
| | |
| | #175 (permalink) | ||||
| Clingin' on... Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BKK
Posts: 3,998
| Quote:
So is Butterfly right that production is rising in tandem with demand? Answers on a postcard etc., etc... ![]() | ||||
| | |
| | #177 (permalink) | ||
| Suspended Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,629
| Quote:
The growing supply of oil (note, it doesn't say rate) match growing demand. Is demand served by supply ? yes, is demand growing faster than supply, probably, but as long as supply serves demand, everything is fine. A growth rate is NOT quantity, and is irrelevant in the price equilibrium of demand and supply. That's what you are failing to understand, and you keep barking at the wrong tree. Quote:
|