![]() |
|
Welcome to the TeakDoor.com forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| |||||||
| Issues There is much going on in the world and the opportunity to discuss these issues and how they affect your world is always relevant. Your opinion is important and though we might not solve the problems confronting society, we just might open someones eyes. What is your opinion? |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Baa gaam Member Last Online: Today 06:07 PM Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: โรงแรมม่านรูด
Posts: 2,031
| Royals 'cost each taxpayer 66 pence' Royals 'cost each taxpayer 66p' ![]() Palace officials said the cost of royal travel would vary from year to year The Queen and the Royal Family have cost each taxpayer 66p during the last 12 months - up 4p on the previous year, Buckingham Palace accounts have shown. The total amount spent on maintaining the monarchy in the year to 31 March rose by £2m to £40m, figures revealed. The cost of official royal travel and the Queen's Civil List - funds for her work as head of state - also increased. Officials said much of the money was spent on more official overseas trips and essential maintenance of palaces. Overseas trips The amount spent on royal travel rose by £600,000 to £6.2m during the 2007-08 financial year and the Queen's Civil List increased by £500,000 to £12.7m. The most expensive official overseas engagement was the Queen's state visit to America in May last year to celebrate the 400th anniversary of the Jamestown settlement. A plane was chartered at a cost of £381,813. Buckingham Palace officials described the cost of the Royal Family to each taxpayer as less than the price of two pints of milk or an MP3 player download. Sir Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse, pointed out that the annual cost of the monarchy was lower in real terms than in 2001 and that the royals had responded to demands from government to carry out more visits abroad. "Expenditure on royal travel, which will vary from year to year, also increased in response to the number of overseas visits undertaken at the request of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and UK Trade and Investment," he said. He said a grant from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport for the maintenance of palaces was to remain at £15m each year for the next three years. This meant that without an increase in funding for 12 years, "the backlog in essential maintenance projects has continued to grow", he added. "In the absence of any increase of funding, the backlog of work is estimated at £32m in today's money." The £40m quoted in the accounts does not include the cost of security provided by the police and Army or the ceremonial duties carried out by the armed forces. it would be cheaper to have them stuffed
__________________ I can resist everything except temptation! |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| ฝรั่งพูดมาก Last Online: Today 06:06 PM Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nong Khai
Posts: 9,482
| ^ I edited my post because at 66p/taxpayer, they can't be including those poor, unfortunate souls to reach 40m. (Unless there's a shitload of people in UK who aren't taxpayers.) ^^What does that mean? At least the burger vendor is supplying a service/product that you can decide to take it or leave it... Last edited by Texpat : 27-06-2008 at 08:42 PM. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
The whole LONDON / UK experience is part and parcel of the Royal thing. | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| The Fishkeeper Last Online: Today 06:32 PM Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Bangkok
Posts: 4,247
| I used to be far more against the British royals, but as I have got older seem not to care so much. I think they bring in a fair bit of cash to the UK from tourism which balances things out and I think the Queen herself has done a lot for the country. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
No...... I haven't got a link........ | |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) | ||
| Railay Beach Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 116
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |