Not at all latin, complementary and alternative treatments are simply different names for the same thing unproven treatments often based upon anecdotal evidence and hocus pocus. There are the odd exceptions; but here's the think once they have been proven they stop being complementary and become mainstream medicine and it generally takes way less than a decade for this to happen.
And how with the internet giving the same voice to the expert, the lunatic and the conman, its absolutely necessary to learn to differentiate between the quality of different evidence. The reason some of us disagree with your stance on alternative/complimentary treatments is not that we are blind, its because we are not gullable.
Here's a litmus test to help differentiate between quack and real treatments, when they have been studied for decades as time goes on the evidence for the effectiveness of the treatment becomes dominant, i.e the platinum based chemo drugs, treatments that remain at best controversial after decades of investigation, acupuncture, then inevitably one finds that at best its no better than a placebo.