Having a running battle here with my tgf and wondered if somebody could prove her right!
OK, my gf is from Chiyaphum and has some land there which her mother occupies, but by all accounts, the chanote is in my gf's name.
Now, we both moved to Chiang Mai about 2 years ago and had some problems getting credit for a car from the finance company: she had a steady job and I paid money into her account just to boost the income potential slightly to a rough total of 30,000 baht per month. We saved up about 50% for the car and the finance amount was only about 150,000 baht which we decided could be paid back within 24 months at an affordable rate to us. They turned her down flat saying she was not a resident of Chaing Mai's thus she would not be able to get any credit from them.
Moving on, we have since bought a car and things are going well; however, the next instalment of this argument proceeds: we were talking about buying a condo for her mother, something small and comfortable and inexpensive, and a cost of around 400,000 baht. I asked her if I saved up around 25% of this as a down payment and you used your land in issan as collateral would this be ok?
She said no. Claiming that because she was in CM her land in issan would not be regarded by the bank as valid collateral. She said if she wanted to loan money from the bank - lets just say bangkok bank for example - then she is only permitted to buy a condo within the province her land is situated in.
How true is that?
I may be well off the mark, and I could possibly lose a 1,000 baht bet with her because of this, but it was my understanding that regardless of where your owned land in the kingdom the bank would take this into account as a valid means of collateral if you were ever unable to pay back the payments for a small condo for example?
Please say i'm right because I would love to take 1,000 baht off of her !!!