Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Mid
    Mid is offline
    Thailand Expat
    Mid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    1,413

    SEC Issues Temporary Ban Against Short Selling

    SEC Issues Temporary Ban Against Short Selling
    SEPTEMBER 19, 2008, 6:16 A.M. ET
    By KARA SCANNELL, DEBORAH SOLOMON, CRAIG KARMIN and GREGORY ZUCKERMAN


    The Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday launched an aggressive assault against short-sellers, saying it would temporarily prevent investors from making bets on stock declines in an attempt to stem some of the worst stock-market slides in years.

    The SEC, which had convened a late-night commission meeting Thursday to consider several items, said in a statement early Friday morning it is halting short selling on 799 financial stocks. The ban, which is effective immediately, is set to last for 10 days, but could be extended for up to 30 days.

    "The Commission is committed to using every weapon in its arsenal to combat market manipulation that threatens investors and capital markets," SEC Chairman Christopher Cox said. "The emergency order temporarily banning short selling of financial stocks will restore equilibrium to markets. This action, which would not be necessary in a well-functioning market, is temporary in nature and part of the comprehensive set of steps being taken by the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, and the Congress."

    The SEC announced other temporary measures, including a requirement for large institutional money managers to report short positions in certain stocks. It also eased restrictions on corporate stock buy backs, saying that will give companies greater flexibility to buy their own shares and help restore liquidity at a time "of unusual and extraordinary market volatility."

    In short selling, traders borrow shares of stock and sell them, hoping the price of the shares declines and they can profit by buying them back at a lower price. Short sellers have become scapegoats for the big declines in the share prices of weakened companies including Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and American International Group Inc., though it is unclear whether they were the cause of the declines.

    The SEC said it was acting in concert with the U.K.'s Financial Services Authority. The FSA said Thursday it would ban short selling in financial stocks until January, and would review the ban in 30 days. The FSA also announced additional disclosure requirements from hedge funds of short sales if a certain threshold is met.

    U.K. Treasury Chief Alistair Darling, who was involved in the FSA's decision, said in a statement he welcomed the FSA's "decisive action." He said in current market conditions it was in the "interests of financial stability."

    At their most draconian, such rules would only allow investors to bet that stocks would rise and would ban the investing strategies used by hundreds of mutual funds, hedge funds, pension funds, endowments and governments. Many use short selling to protect themselves from big unexpected losses, and many financial firms bet against stocks to offset trades made by their clients so they aren't exposed to big market moves.
    The U.S. government efforts came after the companies whose stocks have fallen lobbied Washington to limit short selling.

    Both Morgan Stanley Chief Executive John Mack and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein spoke to numerous government officials in the past few days to discuss how to reduce the perceived abuses of short sellers, people familiar with the matter said. The two CEOs have also spoken five or six times about the issue in recent days, one of these people added.

    Calpers-California Public Employees' Retirement System, the largest U.S. public pension fund, said it is no longer lending out shares of Goldman, Morgan Stanley or Wachovia. Lending of shares is an essential step in the short-selling process, and the move could help limit negative bets on those stocks. "We share a degree of concern about volatility in financials," says Eric Baggesen, Calpers senior investment officer.

    Meanwhile, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said he was opening investigations into short sellers who he believes are trafficking in false rumors to manipulate the market. "No one is saying short selling caused this crisis," Mr. Cuomo said in an interview. "I believe it's possible that it's been aggravated by illegal short selling -- people passing on fraudulent information and conspiring to drive down the value of a stock." (See related article.)

    The multipronged action follows several days of calls among lawmakers, Wall Street executives and regulators as they try to sort out the source of the stocks slide.

    Hedge-fund lobbying groups objected to the moves, saying regulators and executives haven't presented any evidence of abusive or manipulative short selling.

    "While this is all politically pleasing to the regulatory powers that be, the fact of the matter is that there has been no evidence presented of short sellers circulating false market rumors to drive down the price of stocks," said James Chanos, a well-known short-seller and chairman of the Coalition of Private Investment Companies, a hedge-fund lobby group.
    He says regulators are missing the point as the rules don't address the large market of credit-default swaps, which are insurance contracts to debt instruments that trade outside of established exchanges and are unregulated. "The trading in those contracts dwarfs the trading in equities in financial firms. Until the SEC or Commodity Futures Trading Commission or whomever gets their hands around that, the banning of the short selling is meaningless," Mr. Chanos said.

    In a short sale, a trader sells borrowed stock, hoping it will fall in price, a practice that is permissible. In an abusive short sale, known as naked short selling, a trader never borrows any stock and doesn't intend to deliver it to the buyer at a later date. Executives and regulators believe some traders are abusing the strategy to pummel shares of financial stocks.

    The SEC sped up its rule-making and on Wednesday it announced three trading rules that were aimed at curbing abusive short selling. Calls continued that afternoon with New York Sens. Charles Schumer and Hillary Clinton, who urged Mr. Cox to halt all short-selling for financial stock. They reasoned it was necessary to aid their Wall Street constituents. Late Wednesday night the SEC announced intentions to require hedge funds to disclose more information about their short positions.

    The reviews of the SEC emergency moves were mixed with many traders saying they led to confusion in the market and could lead to more volatility. Others continued to urge the SEC to reinstate the so-called uptick rule, which put speed bumps in place to slow the pace of short sales.

    Richard Baker, head of the Managed Funds Association, a hedge fund lobbying group, downplayed the role of short selling in the volatile market, saying that hedge funds short because they identify fundamental problems with a company. "If in fact a company does fail," he said, "it will have nothing to do with the fact that someone on the outside noticed these deficiencies."

    The moves by the U.S. and British regulatory agencies to restrict short selling could encourage investors to take other steps to bet against companies, such as using the options market. They also raised questions about the impact on markets that depend on short selling, such as convertible-bond trading, where investors usually buy a convertible bond and then short the same stock, to protect themselves.

    "It makes sense that this sort of regulation will mean liquidity takes a hit, but on the other hand options will probably see an increase in volume as players use that market to express a negative opinion," says Lou Brien, a strategist at DRW Trading in Chicago.

    Short sellers say that if they have to disclose their short sales it could create more pressure on stock. For example, if a well-known investment firm reported that it was targeting a stock, other investors might panic and sell shares. That doesn't happen very much when they report that they have purchased a stock, however, so it's not clear if there would be more impact on the way down.

    Hedge funds expressed concern that short-sale limits could cause investors to panic about the balance of their portfolios, and have the unintended consequence of causing hedge funds to sell so-called long positions -- or bets that companies' shares will rise -- because they'll feel less able to "hedge" those positions through short sales, according to a person who took part in several afternoon phone calls with SEC staff.

    —Judith Burns, Patrick Yoest, Jenny Strasburg and Amir Efrati contributed to this article.

    online.wsj.com


    and in related news the London boys have two weeks to declare their positions .....................

    effects the markets in Britain , Ireland , United States , Australia and possibly others I've missed .

    .

  2. #2
    ding ding ding
    Spin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,608
    Quote Originally Posted by Mid
    The Commission is committed to using every weapon in its arsenal to combat market manipulation that threatens investors and capital markets
    Quote Originally Posted by Mid
    Others continued to urge the SEC to reinstate the so-called uptick rule, which put speed bumps in place to slow the pace of short sales.
    They should never have removed the uptick rule, that was fcuk up 101 for sure and they know it.

  3. #3
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    30,009
    Should do like the Russians. When things look bad just shut all trading down.

  4. #4
    My kind of town
    chitown's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,520
    Not that I am greedy, but how will this affect the baht?

    40 to the dollar maybe?

  5. #5
    I don't know barbaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on pacific ocean, south america
    Posts
    21,406
    Quote Originally Posted by Spin View Post
    They should never have removed the uptick rule, that was fcuk up 101 for sure and they know it.
    Do you think the "uptick rule" will come back?

    It would be for the better don't you think?

    I mean....it's speculation and it has negative forces.

  6. #6
    I am in Jail
    Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    01-02-2019 @ 03:12 PM
    Posts
    39,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Spin
    They should never have removed the uptick rule,
    when did that happen ?

  7. #7
    ding ding ding
    Spin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,608
    Quote Originally Posted by Milkman
    It would be for the better don't you think?
    Yes i really do, the uptick rule greatly reduces the chances of security manipulation by computer driven trading. What we have seen happen to the majority of the financial institutions has been scandalous use of rumours and computers to kick the crap out of share value. Im 100% convinced of that.
    Yes we know that these companies have some serious problems, but the manner in which they have been picked off, almost in the order that was predicted on blogs around the world has been astonishing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Butterfly
    when did that happen ?
    The rule has stood and worked perfectly well since 1938 but was removed on July 3rd 2007. Now at that time the credit crunch hadn't arrived and although Wall Street knew full well the housing downturn was coming the market was engaging in "irrational exuberance" and racing up towards record highs. August 18th 2007 was the day the shit hit the fan for the first time as the credit crunch became reality.

    linky

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •